Olympus E-PL7 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ
86 Imaging
53 Features
81 Overall
64
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/889c2/889c2b7c2818307cae4014173a151fbd44cdaeb0" alt="Olympus PEN E-PL7 front Olympus PEN E-PL7 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/86e58/86e58dbdc1df53889f3e4aef4918a9ae36fe6ab0" alt="Olympus SP-800 UZ front Olympus SP-800 UZ front"
69 Imaging
36 Features
35 Overall
35
Olympus E-PL7 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 357g - 115 x 67 x 38mm
- Revealed September 2014
- Succeeded the Olympus E-PL6
- Renewed by Olympus E-PL8
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200 (Expand to 1000)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-840mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
- 455g - 110 x 90 x 91mm
- Introduced February 2010
- Replacement is Olympus SP-810 UZ
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus E-PL7 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Overview
Below is a in-depth review of the Olympus E-PL7 versus Olympus SP-800 UZ, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom and they are both manufactured by Olympus. The image resolution of the E-PL7 (16MP) and the SP-800 UZ (14MP) is pretty similar but the E-PL7 (Four Thirds) and SP-800 UZ (1/2.3") have totally different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
The E-PL7 was announced 4 years later than the SP-800 UZ and that is quite a sizable difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-PL7 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus SP-800 UZ being a Compact camera.
Before diving right into a in-depth comparison, here is a quick synopsis of how the E-PL7 scores versus the SP-800 UZ when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus E-PL7 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus PEN E-PL7 & Olympus SP-800 UZ. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus E-PL7 Gallery & Olympus SP-800 UZ Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL7 over the Olympus SP-800 UZ
E-PL7 | SP-800 UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | September 2014 | ![]() | February 2010 | More recent by 56 months |
Manual focus | ![]() | Very accurate focus | ||
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen resolution | 1037k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper screen (+807k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-800 UZ over the Olympus E-PL7
SP-800 UZ | E-PL7 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-PL7 and Olympus SP-800 UZ
E-PL7 | SP-800 UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal screen measurement |
Olympus E-PL7 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Physical Comparison
For those who are going to lug around your camera regularly, you are going to need to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-PL7 has physical dimensions of 115mm x 67mm x 38mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.5") having a weight of 357 grams (0.79 lbs) and the Olympus SP-800 UZ has dimensions of 110mm x 90mm x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6") along with a weight of 455 grams (1.00 lbs).
See the Olympus E-PL7 versus Olympus SP-800 UZ in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you have attached at the time. The following is a front view measurement comparison of the E-PL7 vs the SP-800 UZ.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5028c/5028cbdbff20213b5bf9ce2e41898f2e46708887" alt="Olympus E-PL7 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ size comparison Olympus E-PL7 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ size comparison"
Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the E-PL7 and SP-800 UZ is 86 and 69 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/335ec/335ece86da159485efd43213a7e32bdf95eceea1" alt="Olympus E-PL7 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ top view buttons comparison Olympus E-PL7 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-PL7 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is tough to visualise the gap between sensor measurements simply by reviewing a spec sheet. The visual below will help provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the E-PL7 and SP-800 UZ.
Clearly, both of the cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The E-PL7 having a bigger sensor will make achieving shallow DOF simpler and the Olympus E-PL7 will offer you more detail with its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop photographs more aggressively. The younger E-PL7 is going to have a benefit when it comes to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3865/c38650812547321d92592869ad1686f51491cb60" alt="Olympus E-PL7 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ sensor size comparison Olympus E-PL7 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-PL7 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f1318/f13180c4057b3027c25344e5d6fd175fe782e629" alt="Olympus E-PL7 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-PL7 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-PL7 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PL7 | Olympus SP-800 UZ | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus PEN E-PL7 | Olympus SP-800 UZ |
Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2014-09-01 | 2010-02-02 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic VII | TruePic III |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 14MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 3216 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
Maximum boosted ISO | - | 1000 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 64 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | 81 | 143 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 28-840mm (30.0x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/2.8-5.6 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 1cm |
Available lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 1,037 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 12 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 8.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 3.10 m |
Flash modes | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | H.264, Motion JPEG | H.264 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 357 gr (0.79 lb) | 455 gr (1.00 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 115 x 67 x 38mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.5") | 110 x 90 x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 72 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 22.7 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.4 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 873 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 photos | - |
Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | BLS-50 | Li-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes (12 or 2 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC card | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Cost at launch | $499 | $270 |