Olympus E-PL7 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS
86 Imaging
53 Features
81 Overall
64
91 Imaging
36 Features
42 Overall
38
Olympus E-PL7 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 357g - 115 x 67 x 38mm
- Launched September 2014
- Old Model is Olympus E-PL6
- Replacement is Olympus E-PL8
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 111 x 67 x 29mm
- Announced June 2013
Olympus E-PL7 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Overview
Its time to examine more in depth at the Olympus E-PL7 versus Olympus TG-2 iHS, one being a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the other is a Waterproof and both of them are produced by Olympus. There is a crucial difference among the image resolutions of the E-PL7 (16MP) and TG-2 iHS (12MP) and the E-PL7 (Four Thirds) and TG-2 iHS (1/2.3") enjoy different sensor size.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe E-PL7 was announced 15 months later than the TG-2 iHS making the cameras a generation apart from each other. Each of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-PL7 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus TG-2 iHS being a Compact camera.
Before getting straight into a more detailed comparison, below is a quick summation of how the E-PL7 grades versus the TG-2 iHS in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus E-PL7 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus PEN E-PL7 and Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus E-PL7 Gallery and Olympus TG-2 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL7 over the Olympus TG-2 iHS
E-PL7 | TG-2 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | September 2014 | June 2013 | Fresher by 15 months | |
Manual focus | More exact focus | |||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Display resolution | 1037k | 610k | Crisper display (+427k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies | |||
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-2 iHS over the Olympus E-PL7
TG-2 iHS | E-PL7 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-PL7 and Olympus TG-2 iHS
E-PL7 | TG-2 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical display size |
Olympus E-PL7 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to carry your camera regularly, you will want to take into account its weight and volume. The Olympus E-PL7 features exterior measurements of 115mm x 67mm x 38mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.5") with a weight of 357 grams (0.79 lbs) and the Olympus TG-2 iHS has sizing of 111mm x 67mm x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") and a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus E-PL7 versus Olympus TG-2 iHS in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you have chosen during that time. Below is the front view scale comparison of the E-PL7 compared to the TG-2 iHS.
Using size and weight, the portability score of the E-PL7 and TG-2 iHS is 86 and 91 respectively.
Olympus E-PL7 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is very tough to picture the difference in sensor sizing simply by looking through specifications. The visual here will help give you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-PL7 and TG-2 iHS.
To sum up, both cameras have got different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The E-PL7 using its larger sensor is going to make achieving shallow depth of field easier and the Olympus E-PL7 will provide you with greater detail with its extra 4MP. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop images much more aggressively. The more modern E-PL7 should have a benefit with regard to sensor innovation.
Olympus E-PL7 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-PL7 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PL7 | Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus PEN E-PL7 | Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS |
Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Waterproof |
Launched | 2014-09-01 | 2013-06-28 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic VII | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 12MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3968 x 2976 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 81 | - |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/2.0-4.9 |
Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
Number of lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 1,037 thousand dot | 610 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen tech | - | OLED |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 4 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 8.0fps | 5.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | - |
Flash modes | no built-in flash | - |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | H.264, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 357g (0.79 lb) | 230g (0.51 lb) |
Dimensions | 115 x 67 x 38mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.5") | 111 x 67 x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 72 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 22.7 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.4 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 873 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 photographs | 350 photographs |
Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLS-50 | Li-90B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes (2 and 12 sec, Pet Auto Shutter) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC card | - |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Price at launch | $499 | $380 |