Olympus E-PL7 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
86 Imaging
54 Features
81 Overall
64
85 Imaging
34 Features
44 Overall
38
Olympus E-PL7 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 357g - 115 x 67 x 38mm
- Introduced September 2014
- Replaced the Olympus E-PL6
- New Model is Olympus E-PL8
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-72mm (F2.5-4.4) lens
- 355g - 114 x 70 x 44mm
- Revealed March 2010
Olympus E-PL7 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Overview
Its time to look more in depth at the Olympus E-PL7 versus Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC, former is a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by competitors Olympus and Ricoh. There is a large difference among the sensor resolutions of the E-PL7 (16MP) and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (10MP) and the E-PL7 (Four Thirds) and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (1/1.7") provide different sensor size.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe E-PL7 was launched 4 years after the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC which is a fairly serious difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras feature the same body design (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before we go straight to a complete comparison, here is a quick summary of how the E-PL7 scores vs the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus E-PL7 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus PEN E-PL7 & Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus E-PL7 Gallery & Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL7 over the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
E-PL7 | GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | September 2014 | March 2010 | More modern by 55 months | |
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Screen resolution | 1037k | 920k | Clearer screen (+117k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Take selfies | |||
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC over the Olympus E-PL7
GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | E-PL7 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-PL7 and Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
E-PL7 | GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Dial accurate focusing | |||
Screen size | 3" | 3" | Same screen size |
Olympus E-PL7 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Physical Comparison
When you are going to carry around your camera regularly, you are going to need to factor in its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-PL7 has external measurements of 115mm x 67mm x 38mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.5") with a weight of 357 grams (0.79 lbs) whilst the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC has measurements of 114mm x 70mm x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") with a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs).
Examine the Olympus E-PL7 versus Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you have attached during that time. Below is a front view proportions comparison of the E-PL7 versus the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the E-PL7 and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC is 86 and 85 respectively.
Olympus E-PL7 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is difficult to picture the gap in sensor sizes purely by researching specs. The pic below may provide you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-PL7 and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC.
As you can plainly see, the 2 cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The E-PL7 featuring a bigger sensor is going to make shooting shallow DOF easier and the Olympus E-PL7 will result in more detail utilizing its extra 6MP. Higher resolution will also let you crop pictures a good deal more aggressively. The younger E-PL7 provides an advantage with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus E-PL7 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-PL7 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PL7 | Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Ricoh |
Model type | Olympus PEN E-PL7 | Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC |
Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Advanced Mirrorless |
Introduced | 2014-09-01 | 2010-03-18 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic VII | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/1.7" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 10MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Total focus points | 81 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 24-72mm (3.0x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/2.5-4.4 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 1cm |
Amount of lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 1,037k dots | 920k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 180 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 8.0 frames/s | 2.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 4.50 m |
Flash settings | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video file format | H.264, Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 357 grams (0.79 lbs) | 355 grams (0.78 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 115 x 67 x 38mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.5") | 114 x 70 x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 72 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 22.7 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.4 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 873 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 pictures | 410 pictures |
Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLS-50 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC card | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail pricing | $499 | $349 |