Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus 6000
86 Imaging
54 Features
76 Overall
62
94 Imaging
33 Features
21 Overall
28
Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus 6000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 357g - 115 x 67 x 38mm
- Revealed September 2016
- Previous Model is Olympus E-PL7
- Successor is Olympus E-PL9
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 50 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 179g - 95 x 63 x 22mm
- Introduced July 2009
- Additionally referred to as mju Tough 6000
Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus 6000 Overview
In this article, we are reviewing the Olympus E-PL8 versus Olympus 6000, former is a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the other is a Small Sensor Compact and both of them are created by Olympus. There exists a large gap among the sensor resolutions of the E-PL8 (16MP) and 6000 (10MP) and the E-PL8 (Four Thirds) and 6000 (1/2.3") use different sensor dimensions.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe E-PL8 was introduced 7 years after the 6000 which is a fairly serious difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-PL8 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus 6000 being a Compact camera.
Before getting in to a detailed comparison, below is a quick highlight of how the E-PL8 grades versus the 6000 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus 6000 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus PEN E-PL8 & Olympus Stylus Tough 6000. The whole galleries are available at Olympus E-PL8 Gallery & Olympus 6000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL8 over the Olympus 6000
E-PL8 | 6000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | September 2016 | July 2009 | More modern by 88 months | |
Focus manually | More accurate focus | |||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Display sizing | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 1037k | 230k | Sharper display (+807k dot) | |
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus 6000 over the Olympus E-PL8
6000 | E-PL8 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-PL8 and Olympus 6000
E-PL8 | 6000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen |
Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus 6000 Physical Comparison
When you are intending to carry around your camera regularly, you will want to think about its weight and size. The Olympus E-PL8 has got outside dimensions of 115mm x 67mm x 38mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.5") accompanied by a weight of 357 grams (0.79 lbs) and the Olympus 6000 has specifications of 95mm x 63mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.5" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 179 grams (0.39 lbs).
Look at the Olympus E-PL8 versus Olympus 6000 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you choose at that time. Underneath is the front view sizing comparison of the E-PL8 compared to the 6000.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-PL8 and 6000 is 86 and 94 respectively.
Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus 6000 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is difficult to imagine the contrast in sensor sizes simply by checking out technical specs. The pic underneath will provide you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-PL8 and 6000.
As you can tell, both of these cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The E-PL8 having a larger sensor is going to make achieving shallower DOF less difficult and the Olympus E-PL8 will provide greater detail using its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop images a little more aggressively. The newer E-PL8 should have an edge in sensor innovation.
Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus 6000 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus 6000 Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PL8 | Olympus Stylus Tough 6000 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus PEN E-PL8 | Olympus Stylus Tough 6000 |
Also referred to as | - | mju Tough 6000 |
Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2016-09-19 | 2009-07-01 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic VII | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 10MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 1600 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 50 |
RAW support | ||
Lowest enhanced ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 81 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/3.5-5.1 |
Macro focus range | - | 2cm |
Total lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3" | 2.7" |
Resolution of screen | 1,037 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60s | 1/4s |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter rate | 8.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 4.00 m |
Flash modes | no built-in flash | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video data format | H.264, Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 357 gr (0.79 lbs) | 179 gr (0.39 lbs) |
Dimensions | 115 x 67 x 38mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.5") | 95 x 63 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.5" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 photographs | - |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes (12 seconds) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC card | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at release | $500 | $259 |