Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS
86 Imaging
54 Features
76 Overall
62
92 Imaging
36 Features
37 Overall
36
Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 357g - 115 x 67 x 38mm
- Released September 2016
- Replaced the Olympus E-PL7
- Refreshed by Olympus E-PL9
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 206g - 101 x 65 x 26mm
- Launched February 2012
Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Overview
Its time to take a more detailed look at the Olympus E-PL8 versus Olympus TG-820 iHS, one is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the latter is a Waterproof and both are offered by Olympus. There exists a sizeable gap between the resolutions of the E-PL8 (16MP) and TG-820 iHS (12MP) and the E-PL8 (Four Thirds) and TG-820 iHS (1/2.3") use different sensor dimensions.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe E-PL8 was released 4 years after the TG-820 iHS which is quite a large gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-PL8 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus TG-820 iHS being a Compact camera.
Before we go in to a detailed comparison, below is a quick summation of how the E-PL8 grades vs the TG-820 iHS when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus PEN E-PL8 and Olympus TG-820 iHS. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus E-PL8 Gallery and Olympus TG-820 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL8 over the Olympus TG-820 iHS
E-PL8 | TG-820 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | September 2016 | February 2012 | Newer by 57 months | |
Manually focus | Dial accurate focusing | |||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Screen resolution | 1037k | 1030k | Crisper screen (+7k dot) | |
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-820 iHS over the Olympus E-PL8
TG-820 iHS | E-PL8 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-PL8 and Olympus TG-820 iHS
E-PL8 | TG-820 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent screen sizing | |
Selfie screen | No selfie screen |
Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Physical Comparison
If you are planning to travel with your camera, you will have to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-PL8 has physical measurements of 115mm x 67mm x 38mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.5") along with a weight of 357 grams (0.79 lbs) and the Olympus TG-820 iHS has dimensions of 101mm x 65mm x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") with a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs).
Examine the Olympus E-PL8 versus Olympus TG-820 iHS in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you use at that moment. The following is the front view physical size comparison of the E-PL8 vs the TG-820 iHS.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-PL8 and TG-820 iHS is 86 and 92 respectively.
Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it can be hard to imagine the contrast between sensor dimensions just by checking specifications. The image here will provide you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-PL8 and TG-820 iHS.
Plainly, each of the cameras enjoy different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The E-PL8 because of its bigger sensor is going to make getting shallower depth of field less difficult and the Olympus E-PL8 will resolve more detail as a result of its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will allow you to crop pictures far more aggressively. The more modern E-PL8 should have a benefit in sensor technology.
Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PL8 | Olympus TG-820 iHS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus PEN E-PL8 | Olympus TG-820 iHS |
Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Waterproof |
Released | 2016-09-19 | 2012-02-08 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic VII | TruePic VI |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3968 x 2976 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Minimum boosted ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 81 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/3.9-5.9 |
Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
Amount of lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 1,037 thousand dots | 1,030 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen technology | - | HyperCrystal III TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 4 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 8.0 frames per sec | 5.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 3.50 m |
Flash settings | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps)1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | H.264, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 357g (0.79 lbs) | 206g (0.45 lbs) |
Dimensions | 115 x 67 x 38mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.5") | 101 x 65 x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 photos | 220 photos |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | LI-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC card | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at launch | $500 | $500 |