Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS
86 Imaging
54 Features
76 Overall
62
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9a426/9a4260754748d1d18e1d86724961ebe1d9136dca" alt="Olympus PEN E-PL8 front Olympus PEN E-PL8 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d2439/d243927345de5a095aa4910f1a6bf1f8c46d0250" alt="Olympus XZ-2 iHS front Olympus XZ-2 iHS front"
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49
Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 357g - 115 x 67 x 38mm
- Released September 2016
- Earlier Model is Olympus E-PL7
- Renewed by Olympus E-PL9
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Announced December 2012
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Overview
Lets look a little more closely at the Olympus E-PL8 versus Olympus XZ-2 iHS, one is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the other is a Small Sensor Compact and both are created by Olympus. There exists a sizeable gap between the resolutions of the E-PL8 (16MP) and XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and the E-PL8 (Four Thirds) and XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") use different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
The E-PL8 was launched 3 years after the XZ-2 iHS which is quite a large gap as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-PL8 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus XZ-2 iHS being a Compact camera.
Before we go in to a more detailed comparison, below is a concise summary of how the E-PL8 scores versus the XZ-2 iHS when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus PEN E-PL8 and Olympus XZ-2 iHS. The complete galleries are available at Olympus E-PL8 Gallery and Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL8 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
E-PL8 | XZ-2 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | September 2016 | ![]() | December 2012 | More modern by 46 months |
Display resolution | 1037k | ![]() | 920k | Crisper display (+117k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Olympus E-PL8
XZ-2 iHS | E-PL8 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-PL8 and Olympus XZ-2 iHS
E-PL8 | XZ-2 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial precise focusing | ||
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Tilting | Tilting display |
Display sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent display measurements |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Physical Comparison
When you are looking to carry around your camera regularly, you will want to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-PL8 comes with exterior dimensions of 115mm x 67mm x 38mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.5") along with a weight of 357 grams (0.79 lbs) while the Olympus XZ-2 iHS has dimensions of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") with a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus E-PL8 versus Olympus XZ-2 iHS in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are employing at that moment. Below is the front view physical size comparison of the E-PL8 compared to the XZ-2 iHS.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dac6d/dac6d78e1cf766eaf3f54cc67721cc2828946a71" alt="Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS size comparison Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS size comparison"
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-PL8 and XZ-2 iHS is 86 and 85 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f1084/f1084a77de08d6160c3e129c62bcdf0ea92a64da" alt="Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS top view buttons comparison Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Sensor Comparison
Typically, it's difficult to picture the difference between sensor sizes purely by checking technical specs. The pic underneath will offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the E-PL8 and XZ-2 iHS.
As you can tell, both of these cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The E-PL8 due to its larger sensor is going to make shooting shallower depth of field less difficult and the Olympus E-PL8 will resolve greater detail utilizing its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will let you crop photos a little more aggressively. The fresher E-PL8 provides an edge when it comes to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/90f24/90f24ff78473e1e9839b58c7dfa547b28625bd81" alt="Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS sensor size comparison Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/da9c8/da9c81028f9337b24c2ff9635fad138e27221f89" alt="Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PL8 | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus PEN E-PL8 | Olympus XZ-2 iHS |
Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
Released | 2016-09-19 | 2012-12-18 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic VII | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/1.7" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 12MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3968 x 2976 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 12800 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Min enhanced ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | 81 | 35 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 28-112mm (4.0x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/1.8-2.5 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 1cm |
Amount of lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Tilting | Tilting |
Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 1,037 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 seconds | 60 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 8.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 8.60 m (ISO 800) |
Flash modes | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | H.264, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 357 grams (0.79 pounds) | 346 grams (0.76 pounds) |
Dimensions | 115 x 67 x 38mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.5") | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | 49 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 20.4 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 11.3 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 216 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 pictures | 340 pictures |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | Li-90B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC card | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch pricing | $500 | $450 |