Olympus E-PL8 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
86 Imaging
54 Features
76 Overall
62
85 Imaging
34 Features
44 Overall
38
Olympus E-PL8 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 357g - 115 x 67 x 38mm
- Launched September 2016
- Superseded the Olympus E-PL7
- Replacement is Olympus E-PL9
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-72mm (F2.5-4.4) lens
- 355g - 114 x 70 x 44mm
- Announced March 2010
Olympus E-PL8 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Overview
Lets examine more in depth at the Olympus E-PL8 versus Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC, former is a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by companies Olympus and Ricoh. There exists a sizable gap among the sensor resolutions of the E-PL8 (16MP) and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (10MP) and the E-PL8 (Four Thirds) and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (1/1.7") enjoy different sensor sizes.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe E-PL8 was unveiled 6 years after the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC which is a fairly significant difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras come with the identical body type (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before going through a in-depth comparison, below is a quick summary of how the E-PL8 matches up vs the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus E-PL8 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus PEN E-PL8 & Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC. The full galleries are provided at Olympus E-PL8 Gallery & Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL8 over the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
E-PL8 | GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | September 2016 | March 2010 | Newer by 80 months | |
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Display resolution | 1037k | 920k | Clearer display (+117k dot) | |
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC over the Olympus E-PL8
GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | E-PL8 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-PL8 and Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
E-PL8 | GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | More accurate focus | |||
Display dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical display dimensions | |
Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen |
Olympus E-PL8 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to travel with your camera, you are going to need to think about its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-PL8 has physical dimensions of 115mm x 67mm x 38mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.5") along with a weight of 357 grams (0.79 lbs) whilst the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC has dimensions of 114mm x 70mm x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") having a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs).
See the Olympus E-PL8 versus Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you use at that time. Underneath is the front view measurements comparison of the E-PL8 and the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-PL8 and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC is 86 and 85 respectively.
Olympus E-PL8 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it can be hard to visualize the difference in sensor dimensions just by researching a spec sheet. The picture here will provide you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-PL8 and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC.
Clearly, the 2 cameras have got different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The E-PL8 using its larger sensor is going to make shooting shallow DOF easier and the Olympus E-PL8 will render more detail having an extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also help you crop pics much more aggressively. The fresher E-PL8 should have an edge in sensor innovation.
Olympus E-PL8 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-PL8 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PL8 | Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Ricoh |
Model | Olympus PEN E-PL8 | Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC |
Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Advanced Mirrorless |
Launched | 2016-09-19 | 2010-03-18 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic VII | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/1.7" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Minimum boosted ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | 81 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 24-72mm (3.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/2.5-4.4 |
Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
Number of lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 1,037k dot | 920k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60s | 180s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 8.0 frames/s | 2.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 4.50 m |
Flash settings | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video data format | H.264, Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 357 grams (0.79 pounds) | 355 grams (0.78 pounds) |
Dimensions | 115 x 67 x 38mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.5") | 114 x 70 x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 images | 410 images |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC card | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch pricing | $500 | $349 |