Olympus E-PL8 vs Samsung MV800
86 Imaging
55 Features
76 Overall
63
97 Imaging
39 Features
43 Overall
40
Olympus E-PL8 vs Samsung MV800 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 357g - 115 x 67 x 38mm
- Announced September 2016
- Old Model is Olympus E-PL7
- New Model is Olympus E-PL9
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 121g - 92 x 56 x 10mm
- Revealed September 2011
Olympus E-PL8 vs Samsung MV800 Overview
Following is a complete review of the Olympus E-PL8 and Samsung MV800, one is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Olympus and Samsung. The resolution of the E-PL8 (16MP) and the MV800 (16MP) is fairly well matched but the E-PL8 (Four Thirds) and MV800 (1/2.3") come with different sensor dimensions.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe E-PL8 was unveiled 5 years after the MV800 which is quite a sizable gap as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-PL8 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Samsung MV800 being a Compact camera.
Before we go straight into a in depth comparison, below is a brief overview of how the E-PL8 scores vs the MV800 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus E-PL8 vs Samsung MV800 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus PEN E-PL8 and Samsung MV800. The full galleries are provided at Olympus E-PL8 Gallery and Samsung MV800 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL8 over the Samsung MV800
E-PL8 | MV800 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | September 2016 | September 2011 | More modern by 62 months | |
Focus manually | Very exact focus | |||
Display resolution | 1037k | 460k | Crisper display (+577k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung MV800 over the Olympus E-PL8
MV800 | E-PL8 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-PL8 and Samsung MV800
E-PL8 | MV800 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Tilting | Tilting | Tilting display | |
Display sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent display sizing | |
Selfie screen | Neither has selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Olympus E-PL8 vs Samsung MV800 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to carry around your camera often, you will want to think about its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-PL8 has outer measurements of 115mm x 67mm x 38mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.5") along with a weight of 357 grams (0.79 lbs) while the Samsung MV800 has proportions of 92mm x 56mm x 10mm (3.6" x 2.2" x 0.4") with a weight of 121 grams (0.27 lbs).
See the Olympus E-PL8 and Samsung MV800 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are utilising at that time. Underneath is the front view over all size comparison of the E-PL8 compared to the MV800.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-PL8 and MV800 is 86 and 97 respectively.
Olympus E-PL8 vs Samsung MV800 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is very difficult to visualize the difference between sensor sizes merely by checking specifications. The pic below may offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-PL8 and MV800.
To sum up, each of the cameras offer the same exact megapixels but different sensor sizes. The E-PL8 has got the larger sensor which is going to make achieving shallower DOF simpler. The younger E-PL8 should have an advantage in sensor tech.
Olympus E-PL8 vs Samsung MV800 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-PL8 vs Samsung MV800 Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PL8 | Samsung MV800 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Samsung |
Model | Olympus PEN E-PL8 | Samsung MV800 |
Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
Announced | 2016-09-19 | 2011-09-01 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic VII | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 80 |
RAW format | ||
Lowest boosted ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Number of focus points | 81 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/3.3-5.9 |
Total lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Tilting | Tilting |
Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 1,037k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 8 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 8.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 3.20 m |
Flash settings | no built-in flash | - |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30/15 fps), 640 x 480 (30/15 fps), 320 x 240 (30/15 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | H.264, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 357g (0.79 lb) | 121g (0.27 lb) |
Dimensions | 115 x 67 x 38mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.5") | 92 x 56 x 10mm (3.6" x 2.2" x 0.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 images | - |
Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | - | BP70 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC card | Micro SD |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Cost at launch | $500 | $499 |