Olympus E-PL9 vs Olympus SP-610UZ
85 Imaging
55 Features
78 Overall
64
79 Imaging
37 Features
31 Overall
34
Olympus E-PL9 vs Olympus SP-610UZ Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 6400 (Boost to 25600)
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 380g - 117 x 68 x 39mm
- Introduced February 2018
- Earlier Model is Olympus E-PL8
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-616mm (F3.3-5.7) lens
- 405g - 107 x 73 x 73mm
- Released January 2011
- Superseded the Olympus SP-600 UZ
- Replacement is Olympus SP-620 UZ
Olympus E-PL9 vs Olympus SP-610UZ Overview
In this write-up, we are contrasting the Olympus E-PL9 vs Olympus SP-610UZ, former is a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom and both of them are offered by Olympus. The image resolution of the E-PL9 (16MP) and the SP-610UZ (14MP) is very similar but the E-PL9 (Four Thirds) and SP-610UZ (1/2.3") possess totally different sensor measurements.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe E-PL9 was unveiled 7 years after the SP-610UZ which is quite a significant difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-PL9 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus SP-610UZ being a Compact camera.
Before going straight into a in depth comparison, below is a short highlight of how the E-PL9 grades vs the SP-610UZ in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus E-PL9 vs Olympus SP-610UZ Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus PEN E-PL9 & Olympus SP-610UZ. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus E-PL9 Gallery & Olympus SP-610UZ Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL9 over the Olympus SP-610UZ
E-PL9 | SP-610UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | February 2018 | January 2011 | Newer by 87 months | |
Manual focus | More precise focus | |||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Display resolution | 1040k | 230k | Clearer display (+810k dot) | |
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-610UZ over the Olympus E-PL9
SP-610UZ | E-PL9 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-PL9 and Olympus SP-610UZ
E-PL9 | SP-610UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent display measurements | |
Selfie screen | Neither has selfie screen |
Olympus E-PL9 vs Olympus SP-610UZ Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to travel with your camera regularly, you'll have to factor in its weight and size. The Olympus E-PL9 has external dimensions of 117mm x 68mm x 39mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.5") accompanied by a weight of 380 grams (0.84 lbs) whilst the Olympus SP-610UZ has specifications of 107mm x 73mm x 73mm (4.2" x 2.9" x 2.9") and a weight of 405 grams (0.89 lbs).
See the Olympus E-PL9 vs Olympus SP-610UZ in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are using during that time. Below is the front view size comparison of the E-PL9 and the SP-610UZ.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-PL9 and SP-610UZ is 85 and 79 respectively.
Olympus E-PL9 vs Olympus SP-610UZ Sensor Comparison
Normally, it can be tough to envision the gap between sensor dimensions only by going over a spec sheet. The picture below may offer you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-PL9 and SP-610UZ.
As you can see, both of the cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The E-PL9 with its larger sensor will make achieving shallow DOF simpler and the Olympus E-PL9 will offer greater detail having an extra 2MP. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop images a little more aggressively. The more recent E-PL9 will have an edge with regard to sensor technology.
Olympus E-PL9 vs Olympus SP-610UZ Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-PL9 vs Olympus SP-610UZ Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PL9 | Olympus SP-610UZ | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus PEN E-PL9 | Olympus SP-610UZ |
Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2018-02-08 | 2011-01-06 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic VIII | TruePic III |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 3216 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Highest boosted ISO | 25600 | - |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Lowest boosted ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | 121 | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 28-616mm (22.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/3.3-5.7 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 1cm |
Number of lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 1,040 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen technology | - | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 4 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Maximum silent shutter speed | 1/16000 seconds | - |
Continuous shooting rate | 8.6 frames per sec | 1.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 7.60 m (at ISO 200) | 6.30 m |
Flash options | Auto, manual, redeye reduction, slow sync w/redeye reduction, slow sync , slow sync 2nd-curtain, fill-in, off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
Highest video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 380 gr (0.84 lbs) | 405 gr (0.89 lbs) |
Dimensions | 117 x 68 x 39mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.5") | 107 x 73 x 73mm (4.2" x 2.9" x 2.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 pictures | 340 pictures |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | AA |
Battery ID | - | 4 x AA |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I supported) | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Launch price | $599 | $299 |