Olympus E-PL9 vs Olympus TG-310
85 Imaging
55 Features
78 Overall
64
94 Imaging
37 Features
33 Overall
35
Olympus E-PL9 vs Olympus TG-310 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 6400 (Raise to 25600)
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 380g - 117 x 68 x 39mm
- Launched February 2018
- Old Model is Olympus E-PL8
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
- Launched January 2011
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus E-PL9 vs Olympus TG-310 Overview
Below, we are looking at the Olympus E-PL9 versus Olympus TG-310, former is a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the other is a Waterproof and both are manufactured by Olympus. The sensor resolution of the E-PL9 (16MP) and the TG-310 (14MP) is very close but the E-PL9 (Four Thirds) and TG-310 (1/2.3") use different sensor dimensions.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe E-PL9 was announced 7 years after the TG-310 which is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-PL9 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus TG-310 being a Compact camera.
Before diving in to a in-depth comparison, below is a quick view of how the E-PL9 matches up vs the TG-310 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus E-PL9 vs Olympus TG-310 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus PEN E-PL9 & Olympus TG-310. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus E-PL9 Gallery & Olympus TG-310 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL9 over the Olympus TG-310
| E-PL9 | TG-310 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | February 2018 |  | January 2011 | Newer by 87 months |
| Manually focus |  | More exact focus | ||
| Display type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting display |
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 1040k |  | 230k | Crisper display (+810k dot) |
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-310 over the Olympus E-PL9
| TG-310 | E-PL9 |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus E-PL9 and Olympus TG-310
| E-PL9 | TG-310 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen |
Olympus E-PL9 vs Olympus TG-310 Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to travel with your camera, you are going to need to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-PL9 enjoys outer measurements of 117mm x 68mm x 39mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.5") along with a weight of 380 grams (0.84 lbs) and the Olympus TG-310 has dimensions of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") with a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus E-PL9 versus Olympus TG-310 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are employing at the time. Following is the front view dimensions comparison of the E-PL9 vs the TG-310.
Using size and weight, the portability rating of the E-PL9 and TG-310 is 85 and 94 respectively.
Olympus E-PL9 vs Olympus TG-310 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is very tough to imagine the difference in sensor dimensions just by researching specifications. The pic below might offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-PL9 and TG-310.
To sum up, both of those cameras posses different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The E-PL9 using its larger sensor is going to make shooting shallower depth of field simpler and the Olympus E-PL9 will result in extra detail with its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop images somewhat more aggressively. The more modern E-PL9 provides an edge in sensor innovation.
Olympus E-PL9 vs Olympus TG-310 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Olympus E-PL9 vs Olympus TG-310 Specifications
| Olympus PEN E-PL9 | Olympus TG-310 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model | Olympus PEN E-PL9 | Olympus TG-310 |
| Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Waterproof |
| Launched | 2018-02-08 | 2011-01-06 |
| Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | TruePic VIII | TruePic III+ |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 14MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
| Max boosted ISO | 25600 | - |
| Lowest native ISO | 200 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Lowest boosted ISO | 100 | - |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | 121 | - |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | - | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
| Maximal aperture | - | f/3.9-5.9 |
| Macro focus distance | - | 3cm |
| Total lenses | 107 | - |
| Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3" | 2.7" |
| Resolution of display | 1,040 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Display technology | - | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 4 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Maximum quiet shutter speed | 1/16000 secs | - |
| Continuous shooting rate | 8.6 frames per sec | 1.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 7.60 m (at ISO 200) | 4.20 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, manual, redeye reduction, slow sync w/redeye reduction, slow sync , slow sync 2nd-curtain, fill-in, off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
| Max video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 380 grams (0.84 pounds) | 155 grams (0.34 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 117 x 68 x 39mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.5") | 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 350 pictures | 150 pictures |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | - | LI-42B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I supported) | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Price at launch | $599 | $0 |