Olympus E-PL9 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS
85 Imaging
55 Features
78 Overall
64
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/72451/72451490aaef29c2492152393b6befa0666194fc" alt="Olympus PEN E-PL9 front Olympus PEN E-PL9 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/41c7c/41c7c096f5b120d51cec7dfdff2b001e8780d88f" alt="Olympus TG-630 iHS front Olympus TG-630 iHS front"
94 Imaging
36 Features
34 Overall
35
Olympus E-PL9 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 6400 (Boost to 25600)
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 380g - 117 x 68 x 39mm
- Launched February 2018
- Succeeded the Olympus E-PL8
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 167g - 98 x 66 x 22mm
- Launched January 2013
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-PL9 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Overview
Below, we are analyzing the Olympus E-PL9 and Olympus TG-630 iHS, one being a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the other is a Waterproof and they are both produced by Olympus. There exists a crucial gap among the sensor resolutions of the E-PL9 (16MP) and TG-630 iHS (12MP) and the E-PL9 (Four Thirds) and TG-630 iHS (1/2.3") possess totally different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
The E-PL9 was manufactured 5 years later than the TG-630 iHS and that is a fairly serious gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-PL9 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus TG-630 iHS being a Compact camera.
Before delving in to a thorough comparison, below is a simple summary of how the E-PL9 matches up versus the TG-630 iHS in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus E-PL9 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus PEN E-PL9 and Olympus TG-630 iHS. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus E-PL9 Gallery and Olympus TG-630 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL9 over the Olympus TG-630 iHS
E-PL9 | TG-630 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2018 | ![]() | January 2013 | Fresher by 62 months |
Focus manually | ![]() | More exact focusing | ||
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Display resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 460k | Crisper display (+580k dot) |
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-630 iHS over the Olympus E-PL9
TG-630 iHS | E-PL9 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-PL9 and Olympus TG-630 iHS
E-PL9 | TG-630 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical display sizing |
Selfie screen | ![]() | No selfie screen |
Olympus E-PL9 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to carry your camera often, you'll need to factor in its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-PL9 provides outer measurements of 117mm x 68mm x 39mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.5") along with a weight of 380 grams (0.84 lbs) while the Olympus TG-630 iHS has proportions of 98mm x 66mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.6" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 167 grams (0.37 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus E-PL9 and Olympus TG-630 iHS in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you choose during that time. Underneath is the front view measurements comparison of the E-PL9 versus the TG-630 iHS.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/18f0d/18f0d41f0d5cd7a1cbd48cb5c5bb869503ba2a4e" alt="Olympus E-PL9 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS size comparison Olympus E-PL9 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS size comparison"
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-PL9 and TG-630 iHS is 85 and 94 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8d310/8d310f6c540e163f837bffc3c1c9c607a069c3ab" alt="Olympus E-PL9 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS top view buttons comparison Olympus E-PL9 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-PL9 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Sensor Comparison
Quite often, its difficult to envision the gap in sensor sizing purely by checking out a spec sheet. The visual here should give you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the E-PL9 and TG-630 iHS.
As you can see, both of those cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The E-PL9 because of its larger sensor will make shooting bokeh simpler and the Olympus E-PL9 will produce greater detail due to its extra 4MP. Greater resolution can also help you crop pics somewhat more aggressively. The more recent E-PL9 will have an advantage with regard to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/01333/013335eb4f4c3f70dbfacf22981a2aec7a5b4c96" alt="Olympus E-PL9 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS sensor size comparison Olympus E-PL9 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-PL9 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fa323/fa323ac6c9041a9c93136e5175ea895160b038c3" alt="Olympus E-PL9 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-PL9 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus E-PL9 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PL9 | Olympus TG-630 iHS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus PEN E-PL9 | Olympus TG-630 iHS |
Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Waterproof |
Launched | 2018-02-08 | 2013-01-08 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic VIII | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3968 x 2976 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Maximum enhanced ISO | 25600 | - |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Minimum enhanced ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | 121 | - |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/3.9-5.9 |
Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
Available lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 1,040 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60s | 4s |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Max silent shutter speed | 1/16000s | - |
Continuous shutter rate | 8.6fps | 5.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 7.60 m (at ISO 200) | - |
Flash modes | Auto, manual, redeye reduction, slow sync w/redeye reduction, slow sync , slow sync 2nd-curtain, fill-in, off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 380g (0.84 lbs) | 167g (0.37 lbs) |
Dimensions | 117 x 68 x 39mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.5") | 98 x 66 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.6" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 photographs | 220 photographs |
Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | LI-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I supported) | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch price | $599 | $200 |