Olympus E-PL9 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS
85 Imaging
55 Features
78 Overall
64
91 Imaging
36 Features
40 Overall
37
Olympus E-PL9 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 6400 (Push to 25600)
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 380g - 117 x 68 x 39mm
- Revealed February 2018
- Old Model is Olympus E-PL8
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 112 x 67 x 30mm
- Announced May 2012
Olympus E-PL9 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Overview
The following is a detailed comparison of the Olympus E-PL9 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS, former is a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the other is a Waterproof and both of them are offered by Olympus. There exists a considerable gap among the sensor resolutions of the E-PL9 (16MP) and TG-1 iHS (12MP) and the E-PL9 (Four Thirds) and TG-1 iHS (1/2.3") come with different sensor sizes.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe E-PL9 was manufactured 5 years after the TG-1 iHS which is a fairly large difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-PL9 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus TG-1 iHS being a Compact camera.
Before diving straight into a comprehensive comparison, below is a brief introduction of how the E-PL9 grades vs the TG-1 iHS when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus E-PL9 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus PEN E-PL9 & Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus E-PL9 Gallery & Olympus TG-1 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL9 over the Olympus TG-1 iHS
E-PL9 | TG-1 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | February 2018 | May 2012 | Newer by 71 months | |
Manual focus | Very precise focusing | |||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Display resolution | 1040k | 610k | Sharper display (+430k dot) | |
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-1 iHS over the Olympus E-PL9
TG-1 iHS | E-PL9 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-PL9 and Olympus TG-1 iHS
E-PL9 | TG-1 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent display dimensions | |
Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen |
Olympus E-PL9 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to travel with your camera often, you will need to factor its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-PL9 offers outer measurements of 117mm x 68mm x 39mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.5") along with a weight of 380 grams (0.84 lbs) while the Olympus TG-1 iHS has proportions of 112mm x 67mm x 30mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") and a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus E-PL9 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are working with at the time. Here is the front view measurement comparison of the E-PL9 against the TG-1 iHS.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-PL9 and TG-1 iHS is 85 and 91 respectively.
Olympus E-PL9 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is very difficult to visualize the difference in sensor dimensions purely by viewing specifications. The picture underneath might provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the E-PL9 and TG-1 iHS.
To sum up, both the cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The E-PL9 because of its larger sensor is going to make shooting shallower DOF less difficult and the Olympus E-PL9 will result in extra detail due to its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will help you crop photos far more aggressively. The fresher E-PL9 provides a benefit with regard to sensor innovation.
Olympus E-PL9 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-PL9 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PL9 | Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus PEN E-PL9 | Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS |
Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Waterproof |
Revealed | 2018-02-08 | 2012-05-08 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic VIII | TruePic VI |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3968 x 2976 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Highest boosted ISO | 25600 | - |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Minimum boosted ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Number of focus points | 121 | - |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/2.0-4.9 |
Available lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 1,040 thousand dot | 610 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 4 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Highest quiet shutter speed | 1/16000 seconds | - |
Continuous shooting speed | 8.6 frames/s | 3.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 7.60 m (at ISO 200) | - |
Flash options | Auto, manual, redeye reduction, slow sync w/redeye reduction, slow sync , slow sync 2nd-curtain, fill-in, off | - |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 |
Highest video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 380 grams (0.84 lbs) | 230 grams (0.51 lbs) |
Dimensions | 117 x 68 x 39mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.5") | 112 x 67 x 30mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 pictures | 350 pictures |
Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | LI90B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 and 12 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I supported) | - |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Price at launch | $599 | $399 |