Olympus E-PL9 vs Olympus VH-515
85 Imaging
55 Features
78 Overall
64
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/72451/72451490aaef29c2492152393b6befa0666194fc" alt="Olympus PEN E-PL9 front Olympus PEN E-PL9 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/77ce5/77ce56bcec511e7aab885ff155154eb3bca39025" alt="Olympus VH-515 front Olympus VH-515 front"
95 Imaging
36 Features
34 Overall
35
Olympus E-PL9 vs Olympus VH-515 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 6400 (Increase to 25600)
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 380g - 117 x 68 x 39mm
- Launched February 2018
- Succeeded the Olympus E-PL8
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 152g - 102 x 60 x 21mm
- Released August 2012
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-PL9 vs Olympus VH-515 Overview
Following is a comprehensive review of the Olympus E-PL9 versus Olympus VH-515, former is a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact and they are both offered by Olympus. There is a sizable difference between the image resolutions of the E-PL9 (16MP) and VH-515 (12MP) and the E-PL9 (Four Thirds) and VH-515 (1/2.3") have different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
The E-PL9 was unveiled 5 years after the VH-515 which is quite a significant difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-PL9 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus VH-515 being a Compact camera.
Before getting right into a comprehensive comparison, here is a quick highlight of how the E-PL9 scores against the VH-515 for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus E-PL9 vs Olympus VH-515 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus PEN E-PL9 & Olympus VH-515. The full galleries are provided at Olympus E-PL9 Gallery & Olympus VH-515 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL9 over the Olympus VH-515
E-PL9 | VH-515 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | February 2018 | ![]() | August 2012 | More modern by 67 months |
Manual focus | ![]() | More accurate focus | ||
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 460k | Crisper screen (+580k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus VH-515 over the Olympus E-PL9
VH-515 | E-PL9 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-PL9 and Olympus VH-515
E-PL9 | VH-515 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same screen dimensions |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither features selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Olympus E-PL9 vs Olympus VH-515 Physical Comparison
For those who are going to carry around your camera regularly, you should factor its weight and size. The Olympus E-PL9 enjoys exterior measurements of 117mm x 68mm x 39mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.5") along with a weight of 380 grams (0.84 lbs) and the Olympus VH-515 has specifications of 102mm x 60mm x 21mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.8") along with a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs).
Check out the Olympus E-PL9 versus Olympus VH-515 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are using at that moment. Below is a front view measurements comparison of the E-PL9 compared to the VH-515.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/723a0/723a058280c31a3ea3fdabb787d113fb9f3406f9" alt="Olympus E-PL9 vs Olympus VH-515 size comparison Olympus E-PL9 vs Olympus VH-515 size comparison"
Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the E-PL9 and VH-515 is 85 and 95 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5a5c6/5a5c6fe84b2e9a67ef1d873dc42bf465c2144cc5" alt="Olympus E-PL9 vs Olympus VH-515 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-PL9 vs Olympus VH-515 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-PL9 vs Olympus VH-515 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is hard to visualize the contrast between sensor sizes purely by checking technical specs. The image underneath will provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-PL9 and VH-515.
As you can tell, each of these cameras feature different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The E-PL9 using its bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallow DOF easier and the Olympus E-PL9 will resolve greater detail having an extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop pictures way more aggressively. The more recent E-PL9 provides an edge with regard to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a3c95/a3c95858b398f4d34c1f79395fac5c36f1c6ab16" alt="Olympus E-PL9 vs Olympus VH-515 sensor size comparison Olympus E-PL9 vs Olympus VH-515 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-PL9 vs Olympus VH-515 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d850e/d850ee110f83558ecba711cee6632733c5d64382" alt="Olympus E-PL9 vs Olympus VH-515 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-PL9 vs Olympus VH-515 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-PL9 vs Olympus VH-515 Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PL9 | Olympus VH-515 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus PEN E-PL9 | Olympus VH-515 |
Category | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2018-02-08 | 2012-08-21 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic VIII | TruePic III+ |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
Maximum enhanced ISO | 25600 | - |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Lowest enhanced ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | 121 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/2.8-6.5 |
Macro focusing range | - | 5cm |
Number of lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 1,040 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Display tech | - | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60s | 4s |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Max quiet shutter speed | 1/16000s | - |
Continuous shutter speed | 8.6 frames per second | 2.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 7.60 m (at ISO 200) | 4.70 m |
Flash settings | Auto, manual, redeye reduction, slow sync w/redeye reduction, slow sync , slow sync 2nd-curtain, fill-in, off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 380 gr (0.84 lb) | 152 gr (0.34 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 117 x 68 x 39mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.5") | 102 x 60 x 21mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 photos | - |
Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | - | LI-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I supported) | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Retail price | $599 | $648 |