Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic ZS200
85 Imaging
55 Features
78 Overall
64
86 Imaging
53 Features
66 Overall
58
Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic ZS200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 6400 (Expand to 25600)
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 380g - 117 x 68 x 39mm
- Released February 2018
- Older Model is Olympus E-PL8
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Increase to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-360mm (F3.3-6.4) lens
- 340g - 111 x 66 x 45mm
- Launched February 2018
- Alternative Name is Lumix DC-TZ200
- Older Model is Panasonic ZS100
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic ZS200 Overview
Let's look more closely at the Olympus E-PL9 and Panasonic ZS200, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by rivals Olympus and Panasonic. The resolution of the E-PL9 (16MP) and the ZS200 (20MP) is pretty similar but the E-PL9 (Four Thirds) and ZS200 (1") come with different sensor sizes.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe E-PL9 was revealed very close to the ZS200 so they are both of a similar age. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-PL9 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic ZS200 being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before we go in to a detailed comparison, below is a simple highlight of how the E-PL9 matches up against the ZS200 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic ZS200 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus PEN E-PL9 & Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus E-PL9 Gallery & Panasonic ZS200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL9 over the Panasonic ZS200
| E-PL9 | ZS200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS200 over the Olympus E-PL9
| ZS200 | E-PL9 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen resolution | 1240k |  | 1040k | Sharper screen (+200k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-PL9 and Panasonic ZS200
| E-PL9 | ZS200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | February 2018 |  | February 2018 | Similar age |
| Manual focus |  | More exact focus | ||
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent screen dimensions |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic ZS200 Physical Comparison
If you're planning to carry your camera, you'll have to factor in its weight and volume. The Olympus E-PL9 enjoys physical measurements of 117mm x 68mm x 39mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.5") accompanied by a weight of 380 grams (0.84 lbs) and the Panasonic ZS200 has sizing of 111mm x 66mm x 45mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.8") with a weight of 340 grams (0.75 lbs).
Look at the Olympus E-PL9 and Panasonic ZS200 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you have during that time. Underneath is the front view overall size comparison of the E-PL9 versus the ZS200.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-PL9 and ZS200 is 85 and 86 respectively.
Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic ZS200 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it's tough to visualize the contrast between sensor sizing purely by reading technical specs. The graphic here may give you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-PL9 and ZS200.
As you can tell, both of those cameras offer different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The E-PL9 with its bigger sensor is going to make getting shallow depth of field simpler and the Panasonic ZS200 will deliver greater detail because of its extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop shots a little more aggressively.
Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic ZS200 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic ZS200 Specifications
| Olympus PEN E-PL9 | Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Panasonic |
| Model type | Olympus PEN E-PL9 | Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200 |
| Also called | - | Lumix DC-TZ200 |
| Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Large Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2018-02-08 | 2018-02-13 |
| Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Large Sensor Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | TruePic VIII | Venus Engine |
| Sensor type | CMOS | MOS |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1" |
| Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
| Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 116.2mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 20MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5472 x 3648 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 12800 |
| Maximum enhanced ISO | 25600 | 25600 |
| Min native ISO | 200 | 125 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Min enhanced ISO | 100 | 80 |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Total focus points | 121 | 49 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | - | 24-360mm (15.0x) |
| Max aperture | - | f/3.3-6.4 |
| Macro focusing range | - | 5cm |
| Number of lenses | 107 | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 2.7 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 1,040 thousand dot | 1,240 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,330 thousand dot |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.53x |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 60 seconds | 60 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Fastest silent shutter speed | 1/16000 seconds | 1/16000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 8.6 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 7.60 m (at ISO 200) | 6.80 m (at Auto ISO) |
| Flash settings | Auto, manual, redeye reduction, slow sync w/redeye reduction, slow sync , slow sync 2nd-curtain, fill-in, off | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced On/Red-eye Reduction, Slow Sync., Slow Sync./Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | - |
| Maximum video resolution | 3840x2160 | 3840x2160 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | Yes |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 380 gr (0.84 lb) | 340 gr (0.75 lb) |
| Dimensions | 117 x 68 x 39mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.5") | 111 x 66 x 45mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 350 photographs | 370 photographs |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, 3 shots @ 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I supported) | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I compatible) |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Launch cost | $599 | $800 |