Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic FX48
85 Imaging
55 Features
78 Overall
64
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/72451/72451490aaef29c2492152393b6befa0666194fc" alt="Olympus PEN E-PL9 front Olympus PEN E-PL9 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8a7a1/8a7a180937ea0d2aac292604a641c6ce9f80a13b" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX48 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX48 front"
95 Imaging
34 Features
21 Overall
28
Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic FX48 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 6400 (Increase to 25600)
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 380g - 117 x 68 x 39mm
- Introduced February 2018
- Older Model is Olympus E-PL8
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200 (Bump to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 25-125mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 150g - 95 x 53 x 22mm
- Announced January 2009
- Other Name is Lumix DMC-FX40
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic FX48 Overview
In this article, we are reviewing the Olympus E-PL9 versus Panasonic FX48, former is a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Olympus and Panasonic. There is a large difference among the resolutions of the E-PL9 (16MP) and FX48 (12MP) and the E-PL9 (Four Thirds) and FX48 (1/2.3") use totally different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
The E-PL9 was brought out 9 years after the FX48 which is a fairly serious difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-PL9 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic FX48 being a Compact camera.
Before we go in to a thorough comparison, below is a concise synopsis of how the E-PL9 grades versus the FX48 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic FX48 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus PEN E-PL9 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX48. The entire galleries are available at Olympus E-PL9 Gallery & Panasonic FX48 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL9 over the Panasonic FX48
E-PL9 | FX48 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | February 2018 | ![]() | January 2009 | Newer by 110 months |
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial precise focusing | ||
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Display sizing | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
Display resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper display (+810k dot) |
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FX48 over the Olympus E-PL9
FX48 | E-PL9 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-PL9 and Panasonic FX48
E-PL9 | FX48 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | ![]() | Absent selfie screen |
Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic FX48 Physical Comparison
If you're looking to travel with your camera often, you will want to consider its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-PL9 features external dimensions of 117mm x 68mm x 39mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.5") and a weight of 380 grams (0.84 lbs) whilst the Panasonic FX48 has measurements of 95mm x 53mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.9") along with a weight of 150 grams (0.33 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus E-PL9 versus Panasonic FX48 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you have attached at that time. Below is the front view measurements comparison of the E-PL9 and the FX48.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/53e18/53e180b18ec20d4a3242969cedc139d3cfcc2574" alt="Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic FX48 size comparison Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic FX48 size comparison"
Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the E-PL9 and FX48 is 85 and 95 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f4e11/f4e111fa4136e3b0c6b42b27767023740aec2409" alt="Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic FX48 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic FX48 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic FX48 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it can be difficult to envision the gap in sensor dimensions simply by researching specifications. The picture underneath will provide you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-PL9 and FX48.
Plainly, both cameras offer different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The E-PL9 because of its larger sensor will make achieving shallow DOF easier and the Olympus E-PL9 will render extra detail having its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also let you crop pics a little more aggressively. The more modern E-PL9 will have an edge with regard to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b6ed1/b6ed14deda4119529590519ca9601c71055f8b96" alt="Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic FX48 sensor size comparison Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic FX48 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic FX48 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d6fad/d6fadf923cf656d2b8f85ea06a3ebe8b6785f7ca" alt="Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic FX48 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic FX48 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic FX48 Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PL9 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX48 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus PEN E-PL9 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX48 |
Also referred to as | - | Lumix DMC-FX40 |
Category | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2018-02-08 | 2009-01-27 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic VIII | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 12MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Maximum boosted ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 80 |
RAW files | ||
Lowest boosted ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | 121 | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 25-125mm (5.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/2.8-5.9 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 5cm |
Available lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 2.5 inch |
Resolution of screen | 1,040 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 60 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/3000 seconds |
Maximum silent shutter speed | 1/16000 seconds | - |
Continuous shooting rate | 8.6 frames/s | 2.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 7.60 m (at ISO 200) | 6.00 m |
Flash options | Auto, manual, redeye reduction, slow sync w/redeye reduction, slow sync , slow sync 2nd-curtain, fill-in, off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 3840x2160 | 640x480 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 380 grams (0.84 pounds) | 150 grams (0.33 pounds) |
Dimensions | 117 x 68 x 39mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.5") | 95 x 53 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 photographs | - |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I supported) | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Pricing at launch | $599 | $325 |