Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic FX75
85 Imaging
55 Features
78 Overall
64
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/72451/72451490aaef29c2492152393b6befa0666194fc" alt="Olympus PEN E-PL9 front Olympus PEN E-PL9 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a220c/a220c2e13d4b7304cd494deb3786cbaa31bcfeb7" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX75 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX75 front"
94 Imaging
37 Features
32 Overall
35
Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic FX75 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 6400 (Bump to 25600)
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 380g - 117 x 68 x 39mm
- Introduced February 2018
- Succeeded the Olympus E-PL8
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-120mm (F2.2-5.9) lens
- 165g - 103 x 55 x 23mm
- Introduced June 2010
- Other Name is Lumix DMC-FX70
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic FX75 Overview
Lets take a deeper look at the Olympus E-PL9 versus Panasonic FX75, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Olympus and Panasonic. The image resolution of the E-PL9 (16MP) and the FX75 (14MP) is pretty comparable but the E-PL9 (Four Thirds) and FX75 (1/2.3") offer different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
The E-PL9 was launched 7 years later than the FX75 and that is a fairly significant difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-PL9 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic FX75 being a Compact camera.
Before we go straight to a in-depth comparison, here is a simple view of how the E-PL9 scores vs the FX75 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic FX75 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus PEN E-PL9 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX75. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus E-PL9 Gallery & Panasonic FX75 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL9 over the Panasonic FX75
E-PL9 | FX75 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | February 2018 | ![]() | June 2010 | More recent by 94 months |
Focus manually | ![]() | More precise focusing | ||
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper screen (+810k dot) |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FX75 over the Olympus E-PL9
FX75 | E-PL9 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-PL9 and Panasonic FX75
E-PL9 | FX75 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lacking selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic FX75 Physical Comparison
If you're looking to lug around your camera regularly, you need to think about its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-PL9 features external measurements of 117mm x 68mm x 39mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.5") with a weight of 380 grams (0.84 lbs) whilst the Panasonic FX75 has proportions of 103mm x 55mm x 23mm (4.1" x 2.2" x 0.9") along with a weight of 165 grams (0.36 lbs).
Look at the Olympus E-PL9 versus Panasonic FX75 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you have chosen during that time. Following is a front view dimensions comparison of the E-PL9 versus the FX75.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/eecb4/eecb4f9a186930895eee7439a786ea181b353cb6" alt="Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic FX75 size comparison Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic FX75 size comparison"
Using size and weight, the portability grade of the E-PL9 and FX75 is 85 and 94 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ff048/ff0487e3a8d7450328e67e5e3e0fc54b335cd09e" alt="Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic FX75 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic FX75 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic FX75 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is difficult to imagine the gap in sensor measurements just by going through specs. The graphic underneath will help give you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-PL9 and FX75.
All in all, both cameras feature different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The E-PL9 featuring a bigger sensor is going to make getting shallow depth of field easier and the Olympus E-PL9 will produce extra detail utilizing its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also help you crop pictures way more aggressively. The newer E-PL9 should have an advantage with regard to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7dca7/7dca77a1802a77b320a0e26fbc7ebebf167889d8" alt="Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic FX75 sensor size comparison Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic FX75 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic FX75 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/34c88/34c8863a43713791da1a68bb3c5afaa7cb449382" alt="Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic FX75 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic FX75 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic FX75 Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PL9 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX75 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus PEN E-PL9 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX75 |
Other name | - | Lumix DMC-FX70 |
Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2018-02-08 | 2010-06-01 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic VIII | Venus Engine HD II |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 14MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4320 x 3240 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Maximum boosted ISO | 25600 | - |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 80 |
RAW format | ||
Minimum boosted ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 121 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 24-120mm (5.0x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/2.2-5.9 |
Macro focus range | - | 3cm |
Available lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
Resolution of screen | 1,040 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 60 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Highest silent shutter speed | 1/16000 seconds | - |
Continuous shooting rate | 8.6 frames/s | 2.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 7.60 m (at ISO 200) | 7.40 m |
Flash modes | Auto, manual, redeye reduction, slow sync w/redeye reduction, slow sync , slow sync 2nd-curtain, fill-in, off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | AVCHD Lite, Motion JPEG |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 380 grams (0.84 pounds) | 165 grams (0.36 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 117 x 68 x 39mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.5") | 103 x 55 x 23mm (4.1" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 shots | - |
Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I supported) | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Launch price | $599 | $139 |