Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic FX75
85 Imaging
55 Features
78 Overall
64
94 Imaging
36 Features
32 Overall
34
Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic FX75 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 6400 (Bump to 25600)
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 380g - 117 x 68 x 39mm
- Introduced February 2018
- Succeeded the Olympus E-PL8
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-120mm (F2.2-5.9) lens
- 165g - 103 x 55 x 23mm
- Introduced June 2010
- Other Name is Lumix DMC-FX70
Photography Glossary Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic FX75 Overview
Lets take a deeper look at the Olympus E-PL9 versus Panasonic FX75, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Olympus and Panasonic. The image resolution of the E-PL9 (16MP) and the FX75 (14MP) is pretty comparable but the E-PL9 (Four Thirds) and FX75 (1/2.3") offer different sensor measurements.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe E-PL9 was launched 7 years later than the FX75 and that is a fairly significant difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-PL9 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic FX75 being a Compact camera.
Before we go straight to a in-depth comparison, here is a simple view of how the E-PL9 scores vs the FX75 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic FX75 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus PEN E-PL9 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX75. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus E-PL9 Gallery & Panasonic FX75 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL9 over the Panasonic FX75
| E-PL9 | FX75 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | February 2018 | June 2010 | More recent by 94 months | |
| Focus manually | More precise focusing | |||
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
| Screen size | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
| Screen resolution | 1040k | 230k | Sharper screen (+810k dot) |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FX75 over the Olympus E-PL9
| FX75 | E-PL9 |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus E-PL9 and Panasonic FX75
| E-PL9 | FX75 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic FX75 Physical Comparison
If you're looking to lug around your camera regularly, you need to think about its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-PL9 features external measurements of 117mm x 68mm x 39mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.5") with a weight of 380 grams (0.84 lbs) whilst the Panasonic FX75 has proportions of 103mm x 55mm x 23mm (4.1" x 2.2" x 0.9") along with a weight of 165 grams (0.36 lbs).
Look at the Olympus E-PL9 versus Panasonic FX75 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you have chosen during that time. Following is a front view dimensions comparison of the E-PL9 versus the FX75.

Using size and weight, the portability grade of the E-PL9 and FX75 is 85 and 94 respectively.
Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic FX75 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is difficult to imagine the gap in sensor measurements just by going through specs. The graphic underneath will help give you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-PL9 and FX75.
All in all, both cameras feature different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The E-PL9 featuring a bigger sensor is going to make getting shallow depth of field easier and the Olympus E-PL9 will produce extra detail utilizing its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also help you crop pictures way more aggressively. The newer E-PL9 should have an advantage with regard to sensor technology.
Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic FX75 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic FX75 Specifications
| Olympus PEN E-PL9 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX75 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Panasonic |
| Model | Olympus PEN E-PL9 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX75 |
| Other name | - | Lumix DMC-FX70 |
| Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2018-02-08 | 2010-06-01 |
| Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | TruePic VIII | Venus Engine HD II |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 14MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
| Maximum boosted ISO | 25600 | - |
| Minimum native ISO | 200 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Minimum boosted ISO | 100 | - |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | 121 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | - | 24-120mm (5.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | - | f/2.2-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | - | 3cm |
| Available lenses | 107 | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 1,040 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 60 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Highest silent shutter speed | 1/16000 seconds | - |
| Continuous shooting rate | 8.6 frames/s | 2.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 7.60 m (at ISO 200) | 7.40 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, manual, redeye reduction, slow sync w/redeye reduction, slow sync , slow sync 2nd-curtain, fill-in, off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | AVCHD Lite, Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 380 grams (0.84 pounds) | 165 grams (0.36 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 117 x 68 x 39mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.5") | 103 x 55 x 23mm (4.1" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 350 shots | - |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I supported) | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Launch price | $599 | $139 |