Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic FZ300
85 Imaging
55 Features
78 Overall
64
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/72451/72451490aaef29c2492152393b6befa0666194fc" alt="Olympus PEN E-PL9 front Olympus PEN E-PL9 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/eb0e7/eb0e7d68430f7af24efc1c439232dbd28d053d73" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ300 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ300 front"
59 Imaging
37 Features
73 Overall
51
Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic FZ300 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 6400 (Bump to 25600)
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 380g - 117 x 68 x 39mm
- Released February 2018
- Replaced the Olympus E-PL8
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1/16000s Max Shutter
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 25-600mm (F2.8) lens
- 691g - 132 x 92 x 117mm
- Released July 2015
- Superseded the Panasonic FZ200
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic FZ300 Overview
Below, we will be matching up the Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic FZ300, one being a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Olympus and Panasonic. There is a big difference between the resolutions of the E-PL9 (16MP) and FZ300 (12MP) and the E-PL9 (Four Thirds) and FZ300 (1/2.3") feature totally different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
The E-PL9 was unveiled 2 years later than the FZ300 and that is quite a big gap as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-PL9 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic FZ300 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before getting straight into a step-by-step comparison, below is a quick summary of how the E-PL9 grades versus the FZ300 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic FZ300 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus PEN E-PL9 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ300. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus E-PL9 Gallery and Panasonic FZ300 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL9 over the Panasonic FZ300
E-PL9 | FZ300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | February 2018 | ![]() | July 2015 | More recent by 32 months |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FZ300 over the Olympus E-PL9
FZ300 | E-PL9 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Tilting | Fully Articulating screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies |
Common features in the Olympus E-PL9 and Panasonic FZ300
E-PL9 | FZ300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Dial accurate focus | ||
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical screen size |
Screen resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 1040k | Same screen resolution |
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic FZ300 Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to lug around your camera, you have to consider its weight and size. The Olympus E-PL9 enjoys outside measurements of 117mm x 68mm x 39mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.5") having a weight of 380 grams (0.84 lbs) and the Panasonic FZ300 has specifications of 132mm x 92mm x 117mm (5.2" x 3.6" x 4.6") with a weight of 691 grams (1.52 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic FZ300 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are working with at the time. Following is the front view sizing comparison of the E-PL9 vs the FZ300.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/818db/818db9e5bce1a94d67ca78445ecbb43914ad456a" alt="Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic FZ300 size comparison Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic FZ300 size comparison"
Using size and weight, the portability grade of the E-PL9 and FZ300 is 85 and 59 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4284e/4284ec15472affd63be883e951e2e0e279697866" alt="Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic FZ300 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic FZ300 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic FZ300 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is very hard to see the contrast between sensor measurements only by reviewing specs. The visual here will provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-PL9 and FZ300.
All in all, both of the cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The E-PL9 having a bigger sensor will make achieving bokeh easier and the Olympus E-PL9 will offer you more detail having an extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also let you crop photographs much more aggressively. The fresher E-PL9 is going to have an edge when it comes to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/497e9/497e9cd59e322e01978cada55e94c64780e2af70" alt="Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic FZ300 sensor size comparison Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic FZ300 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic FZ300 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c5d0f/c5d0fcb2aea2204f8bc239c6ea4426f0fdfcafc6" alt="Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic FZ300 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic FZ300 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic FZ300 Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PL9 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ300 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus PEN E-PL9 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ300 |
Category | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Released | 2018-02-08 | 2015-07-16 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic VIII | Venus Engine |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 12MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Highest boosted ISO | 25600 | - |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Minimum boosted ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 121 | 49 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 25-600mm (24.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/2.8 |
Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
Number of lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Tilting | Fully Articulated |
Display diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Display resolution | 1,040k dots | 1,040k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 1,440k dots |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 60 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/16000 secs |
Maximum quiet shutter speed | 1/16000 secs | - |
Continuous shooting rate | 8.6 frames/s | 12.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 7.60 m (at ISO 200) | 8.80 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash settings | Auto, manual, redeye reduction, slow sync w/redeye reduction, slow sync , slow sync 2nd-curtain, fill-in, off | Auto, auto w/redeye reduction, forced on, forced on w/redeye reduction, slow sync, slow sync w/redeye reduction, forced off |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 3840 x 2160 (30p, 24p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 30p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
Highest video resolution | 3840x2160 | 3840x2160 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 380 gr (0.84 lbs) | 691 gr (1.52 lbs) |
Dimensions | 117 x 68 x 39mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.5") | 132 x 92 x 117mm (5.2" x 3.6" x 4.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 images | 380 images |
Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I supported) | SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail pricing | $599 | $598 |