Olympus E-PL9 vs Pentax RS1500
85 Imaging
55 Features
78 Overall
64
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/72451/72451490aaef29c2492152393b6befa0666194fc" alt="Olympus PEN E-PL9 front Olympus PEN E-PL9 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ce1de/ce1defc693d186d489caa9ba163f0305eaf354f0" alt="Pentax Optio RS1500 front Pentax Optio RS1500 front"
93 Imaging
37 Features
30 Overall
34
Olympus E-PL9 vs Pentax RS1500 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 6400 (Raise to 25600)
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 380g - 117 x 68 x 39mm
- Revealed February 2018
- Superseded the Olympus E-PL8
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-110mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 157g - 114 x 58 x 28mm
- Released March 2011
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus E-PL9 vs Pentax RS1500 Overview
Let's look a bit more in depth at the Olympus E-PL9 vs Pentax RS1500, one being a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Olympus and Pentax. The resolution of the E-PL9 (16MP) and the RS1500 (14MP) is relatively close but the E-PL9 (Four Thirds) and RS1500 (1/2.3") provide totally different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
The E-PL9 was unveiled 7 years later than the RS1500 and that is a fairly large gap as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-PL9 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Pentax RS1500 being a Compact camera.
Before diving straight to a step-by-step comparison, here is a short overview of how the E-PL9 scores versus the RS1500 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-PL9 vs Pentax RS1500 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus PEN E-PL9 and Pentax Optio RS1500. The full galleries are available at Olympus E-PL9 Gallery and Pentax RS1500 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL9 over the Pentax RS1500
E-PL9 | RS1500 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | February 2018 | ![]() | March 2011 | More recent by 85 months |
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper screen (+810k dot) |
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Pentax RS1500 over the Olympus E-PL9
RS1500 | E-PL9 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-PL9 and Pentax RS1500
E-PL9 | RS1500 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Very precise focus | ||
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither provides selfie screen |
Olympus E-PL9 vs Pentax RS1500 Physical Comparison
If you are planning to lug around your camera, you will want to factor its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-PL9 provides outer dimensions of 117mm x 68mm x 39mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.5") with a weight of 380 grams (0.84 lbs) and the Pentax RS1500 has dimensions of 114mm x 58mm x 28mm (4.5" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 157 grams (0.35 lbs).
Compare the Olympus E-PL9 vs Pentax RS1500 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you choose at that time. Following is a front view overall size comparison of the E-PL9 compared to the RS1500.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ded2b/ded2b13b4c855e2352d247acd64eba8d097e9e03" alt="Olympus E-PL9 vs Pentax RS1500 size comparison Olympus E-PL9 vs Pentax RS1500 size comparison"
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-PL9 and RS1500 is 85 and 93 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/13a95/13a95ea6a2705a2839a803745f6d975fcb6a2f92" alt="Olympus E-PL9 vs Pentax RS1500 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-PL9 vs Pentax RS1500 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-PL9 vs Pentax RS1500 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, its difficult to see the gap in sensor measurements only by viewing technical specs. The graphic underneath should give you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-PL9 and RS1500.
As you can tell, the 2 cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The E-PL9 using its bigger sensor will make getting shallow depth of field less difficult and the Olympus E-PL9 will result in more detail having an extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also help you crop photographs a good deal more aggressively. The younger E-PL9 will have a benefit when it comes to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e1a6f/e1a6f84856aa159c15e67c2c79a9ad06cc8e119d" alt="Olympus E-PL9 vs Pentax RS1500 sensor size comparison Olympus E-PL9 vs Pentax RS1500 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-PL9 vs Pentax RS1500 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4e01b/4e01b812a636656065c9e0d4979fffeb83b0d37c" alt="Olympus E-PL9 vs Pentax RS1500 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-PL9 vs Pentax RS1500 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus E-PL9 vs Pentax RS1500 Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PL9 | Pentax Optio RS1500 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Pentax |
Model | Olympus PEN E-PL9 | Pentax Optio RS1500 |
Category | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2018-02-08 | 2011-03-16 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic VIII | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 14MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 3216 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Max boosted ISO | 25600 | - |
Min native ISO | 200 | 80 |
RAW files | ||
Min boosted ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Number of focus points | 121 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 28-110mm (3.9x) |
Max aperture | - | f/3.5-5.5 |
Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
Total lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3" | 2.7" |
Display resolution | 1,040k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Display technology | - | TFT color LCD with Anti-reflective coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 4 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/1500 secs |
Maximum quiet shutter speed | 1/16000 secs | - |
Continuous shooting speed | 8.6fps | 1.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 7.60 m (at ISO 200) | 3.90 m |
Flash options | Auto, manual, redeye reduction, slow sync w/redeye reduction, slow sync , slow sync 2nd-curtain, fill-in, off | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Max video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1280x720 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 380 gr (0.84 lb) | 157 gr (0.35 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 117 x 68 x 39mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.5") | 114 x 58 x 28mm (4.5" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 photographs | 260 photographs |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | D-LI92 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I supported) | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail cost | $599 | $150 |