Olympus E-PL9 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5
85 Imaging
55 Features
78 Overall
64
69 Imaging
56 Features
45 Overall
51
Olympus E-PL9 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 6400 (Bump to 25600)
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 380g - 117 x 68 x 39mm
- Released February 2018
- Old Model is Olympus E-PL8
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 200 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-85mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 550g - 114 x 75 x 93mm
- Released February 2012
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus E-PL9 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Overview
Its time to take a more detailed look at the Olympus E-PL9 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5, one being a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by competitors Olympus and Ricoh. The sensor resolution of the E-PL9 (16MP) and the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 (16MP) is fairly well matched but the E-PL9 (Four Thirds) and GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 (APS-C) offer different sensor sizing.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe E-PL9 was launched 6 years later than the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 and that is quite a sizable gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras have the same body design (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before we go straight to a detailed comparison, here is a short highlight of how the E-PL9 grades against the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus E-PL9 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus PEN E-PL9 and Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus E-PL9 Gallery and Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL9 over the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5
| E-PL9 | GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | February 2018 | February 2012 | More recent by 74 months | |
| Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
| Display resolution | 1040k | 920k | Sharper display (+120k dot) | |
| Touch display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 over the Olympus E-PL9
| GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 | E-PL9 |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus E-PL9 and Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5
| E-PL9 | GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | More accurate focusing | |||
| Display dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal display measurement | |
| Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen |
Olympus E-PL9 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to lug around your camera frequently, you'll have to think about its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-PL9 features outer dimensions of 117mm x 68mm x 39mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.5") along with a weight of 380 grams (0.84 lbs) while the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 has dimensions of 114mm x 75mm x 93mm (4.5" x 3.0" x 3.7") and a weight of 550 grams (1.21 lbs).
Check out the Olympus E-PL9 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are employing during that time. Following is a front view physical size comparison of the E-PL9 and the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5.

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-PL9 and GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 is 85 and 69 respectively.
Olympus E-PL9 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, its difficult to visualize the contrast between sensor measurements simply by reading through specifications. The graphic here might give you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-PL9 and GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5.
Plainly, both the cameras have the same megapixels but different sensor measurements. The E-PL9 includes the tinier sensor which will make obtaining shallower DOF tougher. The more recent E-PL9 should have an advantage with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus E-PL9 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Olympus E-PL9 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Specifications
| Olympus PEN E-PL9 | Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model | Olympus PEN E-PL9 | Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 |
| Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Advanced Mirrorless |
| Released | 2018-02-08 | 2012-02-02 |
| Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TruePic VIII | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 23.6 x 15.7mm |
| Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 370.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 16MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4928 x 3264 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Highest enhanced ISO | 25600 | - |
| Min native ISO | 200 | 200 |
| RAW images | ||
| Min enhanced ISO | 100 | - |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Number of focus points | 121 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | - | 24-85mm (3.5x) |
| Largest aperture | - | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Amount of lenses | 107 | - |
| Crop factor | 2.1 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Display resolution | 1,040k dots | 920k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Display tech | - | TFT color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | Electronic (optional) |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 60 secs | 180 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/3200 secs |
| Fastest quiet shutter speed | 1/16000 secs | - |
| Continuous shutter rate | 8.6 frames per second | 3.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 7.60 m (at ISO 200) | - |
| Flash modes | Auto, manual, redeye reduction, slow sync w/redeye reduction, slow sync , slow sync 2nd-curtain, fill-in, off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4 |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 380 grams (0.84 lbs) | 550 grams (1.21 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 117 x 68 x 39mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.5") | 114 x 75 x 93mm (4.5" x 3.0" x 3.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 350 images | 400 images |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | - | DB-90 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I supported) | SD/SDHC, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Cost at release | $599 | $871 |