Clicky

Olympus E-PL9 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5

Portability
85
Imaging
55
Features
78
Overall
64
Olympus PEN E-PL9 front
 
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 front
Portability
69
Imaging
56
Features
45
Overall
51

Olympus E-PL9 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Key Specs

Olympus E-PL9
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Display
  • ISO 200 - 6400 (Bump to 25600)
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 380g - 117 x 68 x 39mm
  • Released February 2018
  • Old Model is Olympus E-PL8
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 200 - 3200
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-85mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
  • 550g - 114 x 75 x 93mm
  • Released February 2012
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Olympus E-PL9 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Overview

Its time to take a more detailed look at the Olympus E-PL9 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5, one being a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by competitors Olympus and Ricoh. The sensor resolution of the E-PL9 (16MP) and the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 (16MP) is fairly well matched but the E-PL9 (Four Thirds) and GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 (APS-C) offer different sensor sizing.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

The E-PL9 was launched 6 years later than the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 and that is quite a sizable gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras have the same body design (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).

Before we go straight to a detailed comparison, here is a short highlight of how the E-PL9 grades against the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

        

Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL9 over the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5

 E-PL9 GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 
ReleasedFebruary 2018February 2012More recent by 74 months
Display typeTiltingFixed Tilting display
Display resolution1040k920kSharper display (+120k dot)
Touch display Easily navigate

Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 over the Olympus E-PL9

 GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 E-PL9 

Common features in the Olympus E-PL9 and Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5

 E-PL9 GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 
Manually focus More accurate focusing
Display dimensions3"3"Equal display measurement
Selfie screen Lacking selfie screen

Olympus E-PL9 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Physical Comparison

For those who are intending to lug around your camera frequently, you'll have to think about its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-PL9 features outer dimensions of 117mm x 68mm x 39mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.5") along with a weight of 380 grams (0.84 lbs) while the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 has dimensions of 114mm x 75mm x 93mm (4.5" x 3.0" x 3.7") and a weight of 550 grams (1.21 lbs).

Check out the Olympus E-PL9 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are employing during that time. Following is a front view physical size comparison of the E-PL9 and the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5.

Olympus E-PL9 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 size comparison

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-PL9 and GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 is 85 and 69 respectively.

Olympus E-PL9 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-PL9 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Sensor Comparison

Quite often, its difficult to visualize the contrast between sensor measurements simply by reading through specifications. The graphic here might give you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-PL9 and GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5.

Plainly, both the cameras have the same megapixels but different sensor measurements. The E-PL9 includes the tinier sensor which will make obtaining shallower DOF tougher. The more recent E-PL9 should have an advantage with regard to sensor tech.

Olympus E-PL9 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-PL9 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-PL9 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photography Glossary

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Olympus E-PL9
Portrait photography with Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5
73
focusing manually
MP count decent (16MP)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
offers face detection autofocus
saves RAW formats
73
you can focus manually
good megapixels (16 megapixels)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
provides face detection autofocus
delivers RAW files
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Street Comparison

Olympus E-PL9 Street photography highlights
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Street photography highlights
84
has a tilting screen
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
provides touch focus
55
nice sensor size (APS-C)
delivers RAW files
fixed screen
no image stabilization
more heavy than competitors in class (550g)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-PL9 Sports photography features
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Sports photography features
69
silent mode (1/16,000 seconds)
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
MP count decent (16MP)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
offers tracking autofocus
lacks phase detect autofocus
48
good megapixels (16 megapixels)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
max fps low (3.0 frames per second)
no image stabilization
has no phase detect autofocus
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-PL9 Travel photography details
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Travel photography details
77
connects via bluetooth
provides touch focus
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
built-in flash
screen is not selfie friendly
58
good megapixels (16MP)
flash built-in
relatively wide (24mm)
more heavy than competitors in class (550 grams)
does not offer selfie friendly display
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-PL9 Landscape photography highlights
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Landscape photography highlights
80
focusing manually
swap lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen is a decent size (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
62
you can focus manually
relatively wide (24mm)
pretty good screen size (3 inches)
good megapixels (16MP)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
delivers RAW files
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
no image stabilization
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-PL9 Vlogging information
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Vlogging information
35
screen is touchscreen
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
offers face detection autofocus
good video quality (3840 x 2160 pxls)
screen is not selfie friendly
does not have external mic jack
24
relatively wide (24mm)
provides face detection autofocus
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
does not offer selfie friendly display
no image stabilization
video res low (1280 x 720 pxls)
missing external microphone socket
more heavy than competitors in class (550 grams)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Olympus E-PL9 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-PL9 and Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5
 Olympus PEN E-PL9Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5
General Information
Brand Name Olympus Ricoh
Model Olympus PEN E-PL9 Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5
Class Entry-Level Mirrorless Advanced Mirrorless
Released 2018-02-08 2012-02-02
Physical type Rangefinder-style mirrorless Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Chip TruePic VIII Smooth Imaging Engine IV
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds APS-C
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 23.6 x 15.7mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 370.5mm²
Sensor resolution 16MP 16MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Peak resolution 4608 x 3456 4928 x 3264
Highest native ISO 6400 3200
Highest enhanced ISO 25600 -
Min native ISO 200 200
RAW images
Min enhanced ISO 100 -
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
AF continuous
AF single
Tracking AF
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Number of focus points 121 -
Lens
Lens mounting type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 24-85mm (3.5x)
Largest aperture - f/3.5-5.5
Amount of lenses 107 -
Crop factor 2.1 1.5
Screen
Display type Tilting Fixed Type
Display size 3 inch 3 inch
Display resolution 1,040k dots 920k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Display tech - TFT color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic (optional) Electronic (optional)
Features
Minimum shutter speed 60 secs 180 secs
Fastest shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/3200 secs
Fastest quiet shutter speed 1/16000 secs -
Continuous shutter rate 8.6 frames per second 3.0 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 7.60 m (at ISO 200) -
Flash modes Auto, manual, redeye reduction, slow sync w/redeye reduction, slow sync , slow sync 2nd-curtain, fill-in, off Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Highest video resolution 3840x2160 1280x720
Video file format MPEG-4, H.264 MPEG-4
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 380 grams (0.84 lbs) 550 grams (1.21 lbs)
Physical dimensions 117 x 68 x 39mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.5") 114 x 75 x 93mm (4.5" x 3.0" x 3.7")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 350 images 400 images
Battery type Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model - DB-90
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) )
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I supported) SD/SDHC, Internal
Card slots One One
Cost at release $599 $871