Olympus E-PL9 vs Samsung DV300F
85 Imaging
56 Features
78 Overall
64
96 Imaging
39 Features
33 Overall
36
Olympus E-PL9 vs Samsung DV300F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 6400 (Bump to 25600)
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 380g - 117 x 68 x 39mm
- Revealed February 2018
- Succeeded the Olympus E-PL8
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-125mm (F2.5-6.3) lens
- 133g - 95 x 57 x 18mm
- Revealed January 2012
Olympus E-PL9 vs Samsung DV300F Overview
Here is a detailed overview of the Olympus E-PL9 vs Samsung DV300F, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Olympus and Samsung. The resolution of the E-PL9 (16MP) and the DV300F (16MP) is very well matched but the E-PL9 (Four Thirds) and DV300F (1/2.3") offer different sensor measurements.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe E-PL9 was announced 6 years later than the DV300F and that is quite a large difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-PL9 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Samsung DV300F being a Compact camera.
Before getting into a step-by-step comparison, here is a brief summary of how the E-PL9 matches up against the DV300F for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus E-PL9 vs Samsung DV300F Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus PEN E-PL9 & Samsung DV300F. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus E-PL9 Gallery & Samsung DV300F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL9 over the Samsung DV300F
E-PL9 | DV300F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | February 2018 | January 2012 | Fresher by 75 months | |
Focus manually | Very exact focus | |||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Display resolution | 1040k | 460k | Clearer display (+580k dot) | |
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Samsung DV300F over the Olympus E-PL9
DV300F | E-PL9 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-PL9 and Samsung DV300F
E-PL9 | DV300F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal display measurements | |
Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen |
Olympus E-PL9 vs Samsung DV300F Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to carry your camera often, you'll need to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-PL9 has got physical measurements of 117mm x 68mm x 39mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.5") accompanied by a weight of 380 grams (0.84 lbs) while the Samsung DV300F has dimensions of 95mm x 57mm x 18mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") along with a weight of 133 grams (0.29 lbs).
See the Olympus E-PL9 vs Samsung DV300F in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you have chosen at that moment. Underneath is a front view sizing comparison of the E-PL9 compared to the DV300F.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-PL9 and DV300F is 85 and 96 respectively.
Olympus E-PL9 vs Samsung DV300F Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it's hard to imagine the contrast between sensor sizing simply by checking specifications. The graphic underneath may provide you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the E-PL9 and DV300F.
To sum up, the 2 cameras provide the same megapixels but different sensor sizing. The E-PL9 features the larger sensor which will make achieving bokeh easier. The fresher E-PL9 provides an advantage when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus E-PL9 vs Samsung DV300F Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-PL9 vs Samsung DV300F Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PL9 | Samsung DV300F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Samsung |
Model | Olympus PEN E-PL9 | Samsung DV300F |
Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2018-02-08 | 2012-01-02 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic VIII | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 16MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Maximum boosted ISO | 25600 | - |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 80 |
RAW format | ||
Lowest boosted ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | 121 | - |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 25-125mm (5.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/2.5-6.3 |
Macro focus distance | - | 5cm |
Amount of lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 1,040 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen technology | - | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 16 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Maximum silent shutter speed | 1/16000 secs | - |
Continuous shooting rate | 8.6 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 7.60 m (at ISO 200) | 4.10 m |
Flash modes | Auto, manual, redeye reduction, slow sync w/redeye reduction, slow sync , slow sync 2nd-curtain, fill-in, off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1280x720 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | Optional |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 380g (0.84 pounds) | 133g (0.29 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 117 x 68 x 39mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.5") | 95 x 57 x 18mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 pictures | - |
Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | - | BP88 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I supported) | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Launch price | $599 | $200 |