Olympus E-PL9 vs Sony A390
85 Imaging
55 Features
78 Overall
64
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/72451/72451490aaef29c2492152393b6befa0666194fc" alt="Olympus PEN E-PL9 front Olympus PEN E-PL9 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cc9a0/cc9a0ca2125609e674d299e5b8108d0775ff4eee" alt="Sony Alpha DSLR-A390 front Sony Alpha DSLR-A390 front"
66 Imaging
54 Features
54 Overall
54
Olympus E-PL9 vs Sony A390 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 6400 (Raise to 25600)
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 380g - 117 x 68 x 39mm
- Released February 2018
- Superseded the Olympus E-PL8
(Full Review)
- 14MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 549g - 128 x 97 x 86mm
- Launched July 2010
- Old Model is Sony A380
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus E-PL9 vs Sony A390 Overview
On this page, we will be matching up the Olympus E-PL9 and Sony A390, one is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the latter is a Entry-Level DSLR by competitors Olympus and Sony. The sensor resolution of the E-PL9 (16MP) and the A390 (14MP) is pretty comparable but the E-PL9 (Four Thirds) and A390 (APS-C) boast different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
The E-PL9 was manufactured 7 years after the A390 which is a fairly serious gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-PL9 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Sony A390 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before delving right into a thorough comparison, here is a concise introduction of how the E-PL9 scores versus the A390 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-PL9 vs Sony A390 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus PEN E-PL9 and Sony Alpha DSLR-A390. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus E-PL9 Gallery and Sony A390 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL9 over the Sony A390
E-PL9 | A390 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2018 | ![]() | July 2010 | More modern by 92 months |
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper screen (+810k dot) |
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony A390 over the Olympus E-PL9
A390 | E-PL9 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-PL9 and Sony A390
E-PL9 | A390 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Dial precise focusing | ||
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Tilting | Tilting screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither contains selfie screen |
Olympus E-PL9 vs Sony A390 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to carry around your camera, you should think about its weight and volume. The Olympus E-PL9 has got exterior measurements of 117mm x 68mm x 39mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.5") having a weight of 380 grams (0.84 lbs) and the Sony A390 has sizing of 128mm x 97mm x 86mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 3.4") along with a weight of 549 grams (1.21 lbs).
See the Olympus E-PL9 and Sony A390 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are using during that time. The following is a front view physical size comparison of the E-PL9 versus the A390.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4a8b9/4a8b9e559b64632d6a6c75344024dad7e8a71101" alt="Olympus E-PL9 vs Sony A390 size comparison Olympus E-PL9 vs Sony A390 size comparison"
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the E-PL9 and A390 is 85 and 66 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/56eb9/56eb97a7a691187dc4f23830ed46c84c898fe649" alt="Olympus E-PL9 vs Sony A390 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-PL9 vs Sony A390 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-PL9 vs Sony A390 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it can be hard to picture the gap in sensor sizes purely by seeing technical specs. The pic underneath will help provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-PL9 and A390.
As you can tell, each of these cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The E-PL9 featuring a smaller sensor is going to make achieving shallow DOF more difficult and the Olympus E-PL9 will provide extra detail due to its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop shots a bit more aggressively. The newer E-PL9 provides a benefit with regard to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9a7e2/9a7e2b1756e28753fff1c94ac512a35bbef8effe" alt="Olympus E-PL9 vs Sony A390 sensor size comparison Olympus E-PL9 vs Sony A390 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-PL9 vs Sony A390 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ea790/ea7905d0387e864903cfc810f007bca6d29b1042" alt="Olympus E-PL9 vs Sony A390 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-PL9 vs Sony A390 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus E-PL9 vs Sony A390 Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PL9 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A390 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus PEN E-PL9 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A390 |
Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Entry-Level DSLR |
Released | 2018-02-08 | 2010-07-28 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic VIII | Bionz |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4592 x 3056 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Highest enhanced ISO | 25600 | - |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Minimum enhanced ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Number of focus points | 121 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
Available lenses | 107 | 143 |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Tilting | Tilting |
Display size | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
Display resolution | 1,040k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | Optical (pentamirror) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 95 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.49x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60s | 30s |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/4000s |
Max quiet shutter speed | 1/16000s | - |
Continuous shutter speed | 8.6 frames per second | 3.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 7.60 m (at ISO 200) | 10.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash options | Auto, manual, redeye reduction, slow sync w/redeye reduction, slow sync , slow sync 2nd-curtain, fill-in, off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Wireless |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | - | 1/160s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | - |
Highest video resolution | 3840x2160 | None |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 380 grams (0.84 pounds) | 549 grams (1.21 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 117 x 68 x 39mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.5") | 128 x 97 x 86mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 3.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 66 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 22.5 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 11.5 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 607 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 photographs | 230 photographs |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | NP-FH50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I supported) | SD/ SDHC, Memory Stick Pro Duo |
Storage slots | One | One |
Cost at release | $599 | $500 |