Olympus E-PM1 vs Olympus TG-870
89 Imaging
48 Features
52 Overall
49
91 Imaging
41 Features
46 Overall
43
Olympus E-PM1 vs Olympus TG-870 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 265g - 110 x 64 x 34mm
- Revealed November 2011
- Replacement is Olympus E-PM2
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400 (Boost to 12800)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21-105mm (F3.5-5.7) lens
- 221g - 113 x 64 x 28mm
- Announced January 2016
- Superseded the Olympus TG-860
Olympus E-PM1 vs Olympus TG-870 Overview
Below is a detailed overview of the Olympus E-PM1 versus Olympus TG-870, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Ultracompact and they are both sold by Olympus. There exists a sizable gap among the sensor resolutions of the E-PM1 (12MP) and TG-870 (16MP) and the E-PM1 (Four Thirds) and TG-870 (1/2.3") come with different sensor sizes.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe E-PM1 was introduced 5 years earlier than the TG-870 and that is a fairly significant difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-PM1 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus TG-870 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before we go in to a detailed comparison, below is a simple summation of how the E-PM1 grades against the TG-870 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus E-PM1 vs Olympus TG-870 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus PEN E-PM1 & Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus E-PM1 Gallery & Olympus TG-870 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PM1 over the Olympus TG-870
E-PM1 | TG-870 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Dial precise focus |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-870 over the Olympus E-PM1
TG-870 | E-PM1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | January 2016 | November 2011 | More recent by 50 months | |
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Screen resolution | 921k | 460k | Clearer screen (+461k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-PM1 and Olympus TG-870
E-PM1 | TG-870 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent screen dimensions | |
Selfie screen | Neither has selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | No Touch friendly screen |
Olympus E-PM1 vs Olympus TG-870 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to lug around your camera often, you have to consider its weight and volume. The Olympus E-PM1 has physical measurements of 110mm x 64mm x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 265 grams (0.58 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-870 has sizing of 113mm x 64mm x 28mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.1") along with a weight of 221 grams (0.49 lbs).
Examine the Olympus E-PM1 versus Olympus TG-870 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are utilising during that time. The following is the front view size comparison of the E-PM1 versus the TG-870.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-PM1 and TG-870 is 89 and 91 respectively.
Olympus E-PM1 vs Olympus TG-870 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is hard to visualize the difference in sensor measurements simply by viewing a spec sheet. The graphic below should offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-PM1 and TG-870.
Clearly, both the cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The E-PM1 using its bigger sensor is going to make shooting shallower depth of field easier and the Olympus TG-870 will provide you with more detail using its extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop photographs a little more aggressively. The older E-PM1 will be behind with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus E-PM1 vs Olympus TG-870 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-PM1 vs Olympus TG-870 Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PM1 | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus PEN E-PM1 | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 |
Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Ultracompact |
Revealed | 2011-11-23 | 2016-01-06 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic VI | TruePic VII |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 12800 | 6400 |
Max boosted ISO | - | 12800 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Number of focus points | 35 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 21-105mm (5.0x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/3.5-5.7 |
Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
Amount of lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 460 thousand dots | 921 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Display tech | HyperCrystal LCD AR(Anti-Reflective) coating | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60s | 4s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting rate | 6.0fps | 7.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 4.00 m (at ISO 1600) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, off, LED illuminator |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | 1/160s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (60p) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | AVCHD, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 265 grams (0.58 pounds) | 221 grams (0.49 pounds) |
Dimensions | 110 x 64 x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 113 x 64 x 28mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 52 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 21.0 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.3 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 499 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 330 photographs | 300 photographs |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLS-5 | Li-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Retail pricing | $499 | $280 |