Olympus VR-330 vs Sony A350
94 Imaging
37 Features
38 Overall
37
62 Imaging
52 Features
47 Overall
50
Olympus VR-330 vs Sony A350 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Announced February 2011
- Old Model is Olympus VR-320
(Full Review)
- 14MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 674g - 131 x 99 x 75mm
- Revealed June 2008
- Replacement is Sony A380
Photography Glossary Olympus VR-330 vs Sony A350 Overview
Its time to look a little more closely at the Olympus VR-330 vs Sony A350, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Entry-Level DSLR by companies Olympus and Sony. The sensor resolution of the VR-330 (14MP) and the A350 (14MP) is very similar but the VR-330 (1/2.3") and A350 (APS-C) provide totally different sensor measurements.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe VR-330 was launched 2 years after the A350 which is quite a significant difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus VR-330 being a Compact camera and the Sony A350 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before diving straight to a in depth comparison, here is a short highlight of how the VR-330 grades against the A350 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus VR-330 vs Sony A350 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus VR-330 & Sony Alpha DSLR-A350. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus VR-330 Gallery & Sony A350 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-330 over the Sony A350
| VR-330 | A350 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | February 2011 | June 2008 | Newer by 33 months | |
| Display size | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
| Display resolution | 460k | 230k | Crisper display (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony A350 over the Olympus VR-330
| A350 | VR-330 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | More exact focusing | |||
| Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display |
Common features in the Olympus VR-330 and Sony A350
| VR-330 | A350 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen | |||
| Touch display | Absent Touch display |
Olympus VR-330 vs Sony A350 Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to travel with your camera regularly, you'll need to take into account its weight and size. The Olympus VR-330 features exterior measurements of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs) whilst the Sony A350 has specifications of 131mm x 99mm x 75mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 3.0") and a weight of 674 grams (1.49 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus VR-330 vs Sony A350 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you have at that moment. Following is a front view sizing comparison of the VR-330 compared to the A350.

Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the VR-330 and A350 is 94 and 62 respectively.
Olympus VR-330 vs Sony A350 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it can be hard to see the difference between sensor dimensions merely by reviewing technical specs. The image below will help give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the VR-330 and A350.
As you can tell, each of these cameras feature the identical MP but not the same sensor dimensions. The VR-330 includes the tinier sensor which is going to make obtaining shallower depth of field trickier. The younger VR-330 will have a benefit with regard to sensor technology.
Olympus VR-330 vs Sony A350 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Olympus VR-330 vs Sony A350 Specifications
| Olympus VR-330 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A350 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Sony |
| Model | Olympus VR-330 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A350 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Entry-Level DSLR |
| Announced | 2011-02-08 | 2008-06-06 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TruePic III | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.6 x 15.8mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 372.9mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4592 x 3056 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
| Lens focal range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | - |
| Highest aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | - |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
| Amount of lenses | - | 143 |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Display size | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Resolution of display | 460 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Display tech | TFT Color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Optical (pentamirror) |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 95% |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.49x |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | - | 3.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.70 m | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, Red-Eye, Slow, Red-Eye Slow, Rear curtain, wireless |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | - |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | None |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | - |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 158 grams (0.35 pounds) | 674 grams (1.49 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 131 x 99 x 75mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 3.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | 65 |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 22.6 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 11.5 |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | 595 |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | LI-42B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC | Compact Flash (Type I or II), Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, UDMA Mode 5, Supports FAT12 / FAT16 / FAT32 |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail pricing | $220 | $600 |