Olympus E-PM1 vs Panasonic FX75
89 Imaging
48 Features
52 Overall
49
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6dc20/6dc204eefb71a9ef5bae01d9c451d4e7b9454420" alt="Olympus PEN E-PM1 front Olympus PEN E-PM1 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a220c/a220c2e13d4b7304cd494deb3786cbaa31bcfeb7" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX75 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX75 front"
94 Imaging
37 Features
32 Overall
35
Olympus E-PM1 vs Panasonic FX75 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 265g - 110 x 64 x 34mm
- Revealed November 2011
- Newer Model is Olympus E-PM2
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-120mm (F2.2-5.9) lens
- 165g - 103 x 55 x 23mm
- Announced June 2010
- Also Known as Lumix DMC-FX70
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-PM1 vs Panasonic FX75 Overview
Let's look much closer at the Olympus E-PM1 and Panasonic FX75, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Olympus and Panasonic. The resolution of the E-PM1 (12MP) and the FX75 (14MP) is very close but the E-PM1 (Four Thirds) and FX75 (1/2.3") offer different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
The E-PM1 was unveiled 18 months later than the FX75 making them a generation apart from each other. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-PM1 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic FX75 being a Compact camera.
Before getting into a thorough comparison, here is a brief synopsis of how the E-PM1 scores versus the FX75 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus E-PM1 vs Panasonic FX75 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus PEN E-PM1 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX75. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus E-PM1 Gallery & Panasonic FX75 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PM1 over the Panasonic FX75
E-PM1 | FX75 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | November 2011 | ![]() | June 2010 | More recent by 18 months |
Manual focus | ![]() | Very precise focus | ||
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer display (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FX75 over the Olympus E-PM1
FX75 | E-PM1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus E-PM1 and Panasonic FX75
E-PM1 | FX75 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither has selfie screen |
Olympus E-PM1 vs Panasonic FX75 Physical Comparison
When you are planning to lug around your camera regularly, you will have to think about its weight and size. The Olympus E-PM1 has outer measurements of 110mm x 64mm x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") and a weight of 265 grams (0.58 lbs) whilst the Panasonic FX75 has specifications of 103mm x 55mm x 23mm (4.1" x 2.2" x 0.9") with a weight of 165 grams (0.36 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus E-PM1 and Panasonic FX75 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you have attached at the time. Underneath is a front view scale comparison of the E-PM1 compared to the FX75.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f8fa2/f8fa21c5c42e66679c40228476a946ead508c94d" alt="Olympus E-PM1 vs Panasonic FX75 size comparison Olympus E-PM1 vs Panasonic FX75 size comparison"
Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the E-PM1 and FX75 is 89 and 94 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6a497/6a497ff7543f2aaa57b92398b3350fc559149482" alt="Olympus E-PM1 vs Panasonic FX75 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-PM1 vs Panasonic FX75 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-PM1 vs Panasonic FX75 Sensor Comparison
Often, it's difficult to picture the difference in sensor measurements just by looking through specifications. The photograph here should give you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-PM1 and FX75.
Plainly, the two cameras have different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The E-PM1 having a larger sensor is going to make achieving shallow depth of field easier and the Panasonic FX75 will render greater detail having an extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop images a bit more aggressively. The fresher E-PM1 provides an advantage with regard to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a3ad6/a3ad6b1a6c608d1a04bdb432e56a3158d5b8a9e2" alt="Olympus E-PM1 vs Panasonic FX75 sensor size comparison Olympus E-PM1 vs Panasonic FX75 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-PM1 vs Panasonic FX75 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/26fb8/26fb821b263c3ccf562a9424d02e843614ea5fcc" alt="Olympus E-PM1 vs Panasonic FX75 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-PM1 vs Panasonic FX75 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus E-PM1 vs Panasonic FX75 Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PM1 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX75 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus PEN E-PM1 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX75 |
Also referred to as | - | Lumix DMC-FX70 |
Category | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2011-11-23 | 2010-06-01 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic VI | Venus Engine HD II |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 4320 x 3240 |
Highest native ISO | 12800 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 35 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 24-120mm (5.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/2.2-5.9 |
Macro focus distance | - | 3cm |
Available lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
Resolution of screen | 460 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Screen tech | HyperCrystal LCD AR(Anti-Reflective) coating | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60s | 60s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter rate | 6.0fps | 2.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 7.40 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | 1/160s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video format | AVCHD, Motion JPEG | AVCHD Lite, Motion JPEG |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 265 gr (0.58 lbs) | 165 gr (0.36 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 110 x 64 x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 103 x 55 x 23mm (4.1" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 52 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 21.0 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.3 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 499 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 330 shots | - |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | BLS-5 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch price | $499 | $139 |