Olympus E-PM1 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
89 Imaging
48 Features
52 Overall
49
77 Imaging
52 Features
31 Overall
43
Olympus E-PM1 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 265g - 110 x 64 x 34mm
- Released November 2011
- Successor is Olympus E-PM2
(Full Review)
- 12MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 50mm (F2.5) lens
- 453g - 114 x 70 x 77mm
- Revealed November 2009
Olympus E-PM1 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Overview
Here, we will be analyzing the Olympus E-PM1 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro, one being a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by competitors Olympus and Ricoh. The image resolution of the E-PM1 (12MP) and the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (12MP) is pretty similar but the E-PM1 (Four Thirds) and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (APS-C) posses totally different sensor dimensions.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe E-PM1 was launched 2 years later than the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro and that is quite a sizable gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras feature the same body design (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before going straight to a full comparison, here is a brief summary of how the E-PM1 grades against the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus E-PM1 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus PEN E-PM1 and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro. The complete galleries are available at Olympus E-PM1 Gallery and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PM1 over the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
E-PM1 | GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | November 2011 | November 2009 | More recent by 25 months |
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro over the Olympus E-PM1
GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | E-PM1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen resolution | 920k | 460k | Crisper screen (+460k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-PM1 and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
E-PM1 | GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | More exact focusing | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen size | 3" | 3" | Same screen sizing | |
Selfie screen | Neither features selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Lack of Touch friendly screen |
Olympus E-PM1 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Physical Comparison
When you are going to lug around your camera frequently, you will have to factor its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-PM1 enjoys external measurements of 110mm x 64mm x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") having a weight of 265 grams (0.58 lbs) whilst the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro has dimensions of 114mm x 70mm x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") accompanied by a weight of 453 grams (1.00 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus E-PM1 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you have during that time. Underneath is a front view measurements comparison of the E-PM1 vs the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-PM1 and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro is 89 and 77 respectively.
Olympus E-PM1 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Sensor Comparison
Typically, it's tough to visualise the difference between sensor measurements only by reading specs. The visual underneath may provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the E-PM1 and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro.
As you can plainly see, both the cameras feature the identical megapixels albeit not the same sensor measurements. The E-PM1 includes the tinier sensor which is going to make obtaining shallower DOF tougher. The newer E-PM1 is going to have an advantage in sensor tech.
Olympus E-PM1 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-PM1 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PM1 | Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Ricoh |
Model | Olympus PEN E-PM1 | Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro |
Category | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Advanced Mirrorless |
Released | 2011-11-23 | 2009-11-10 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic VI | GR engine III |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 23.6 x 15.7mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 370.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 4288 x 2848 |
Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 200 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 35 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 50mm (1x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/2.5 |
Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
Total lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Display resolution | 460k dot | 920k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Display technology | HyperCrystal LCD AR(Anti-Reflective) coating | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 180 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/3200 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 6.0 frames per second | 3.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 3.00 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | 1/160 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (24 fps), 320 x 240 (24 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video format | AVCHD, Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 265g (0.58 lbs) | 453g (1.00 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 110 x 64 x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 114 x 70 x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 52 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 21.0 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.3 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 499 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 330 shots | 320 shots |
Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLS-5 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Retail price | $499 | $566 |