Clicky

Olympus E-PM1 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro

Portability
89
Imaging
48
Features
52
Overall
49
Olympus PEN E-PM1 front
 
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro front
Portability
77
Imaging
52
Features
31
Overall
43

Olympus E-PM1 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Key Specs

Olympus E-PM1
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 12800
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 265g - 110 x 64 x 34mm
  • Released November 2011
  • Successor is Olympus E-PM2
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 200 - 3200
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 50mm (F2.5) lens
  • 453g - 114 x 70 x 77mm
  • Revealed November 2009
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Olympus E-PM1 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Overview

Here, we will be analyzing the Olympus E-PM1 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro, one being a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by competitors Olympus and Ricoh. The image resolution of the E-PM1 (12MP) and the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (12MP) is pretty similar but the E-PM1 (Four Thirds) and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (APS-C) posses totally different sensor dimensions.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

The E-PM1 was launched 2 years later than the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro and that is quite a sizable gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras feature the same body design (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).

Before going straight to a full comparison, here is a brief summary of how the E-PM1 grades against the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-PM1 over the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro

 E-PM1 GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro 
RevealedNovember 2011November 2009More recent by 25 months

Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro over the Olympus E-PM1

 GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro E-PM1 
Screen resolution920k460kCrisper screen (+460k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-PM1 and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro

 E-PM1 GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro 
Manual focus More exact focusing
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen size3"3"Same screen sizing
Selfie screen Neither features selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Lack of Touch friendly screen

Olympus E-PM1 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Physical Comparison

When you are going to lug around your camera frequently, you will have to factor its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-PM1 enjoys external measurements of 110mm x 64mm x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") having a weight of 265 grams (0.58 lbs) whilst the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro has dimensions of 114mm x 70mm x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") accompanied by a weight of 453 grams (1.00 lbs).

Contrast the Olympus E-PM1 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you have during that time. Underneath is a front view measurements comparison of the E-PM1 vs the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro.

Olympus E-PM1 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro size comparison

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-PM1 and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro is 89 and 77 respectively.

Olympus E-PM1 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-PM1 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Sensor Comparison

Typically, it's tough to visualise the difference between sensor measurements only by reading specs. The visual underneath may provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the E-PM1 and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro.

As you can plainly see, both the cameras feature the identical megapixels albeit not the same sensor measurements. The E-PM1 includes the tinier sensor which is going to make obtaining shallower DOF tougher. The newer E-PM1 is going to have an advantage in sensor tech.

Olympus E-PM1 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro sensor size comparison

Olympus E-PM1 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-PM1 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-PM1 Portrait photography highlights
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Portrait photography highlights
60
has manual focus
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
has face detection focus
delivers RAW formats
MP count low (12MP)
55
manual focus
decent sensor size (APS-C)
exports RAW files
no liveview
low resolution (12MP)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Street Comparison

Olympus E-PM1 as a Street photography camera
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro as a Street photography camera
75
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
no moving screen
62
decent sensor size (APS-C)
exports RAW files
no moving screen
lack of image stabilization
Photography Glossary

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Olympus E-PM1
Sports photography with Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
49
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
has tracking autofocus
very slow continuous shooting (6.0 fps)
MP count low (12MP)
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
32
decent sensor size (APS-C)
can't change focal length (50mm)
no liveview
continuous shooting slow (3.0 frames/s)
lack of image stabilization
low resolution (12MP)
bad battery power (320 CIPA)
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-PM1 Travel photography info
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Travel photography info
45
does not have Time Lapse recording
MP count low (12MP)
does not contain selfie friendly display
49
has built in flash
bad battery power (320 CIPA)
low resolution (12MP)
display isn't selfie friendly
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.5)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-PM1 Landscape photography highlights
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Landscape photography highlights
65
has manual focus
interchangeable lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen size is good (3")
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
MP count low (12 megapixels)
does not have Time Lapse recording
46
manual focus
good sized screen (3 inches)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
exports RAW files
cannot switch lens (fixed lens mount)
can't change focal length (50mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.5)
no liveview
lack of image stabilization
low resolution (12 megapixels)
bad battery power (320 CIPA)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-PM1 Vlogging highlights
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Vlogging highlights
34
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
has face detection focus
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 pixels)
does not contain selfie friendly display
does not have external mic jack
20
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.5)
display isn't selfie friendly
lack of image stabilization
video quality not great (1280 x 720 pixels)
missing mic jack
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Olympus E-PM1 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-PM1 and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
 Olympus PEN E-PM1Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
General Information
Company Olympus Ricoh
Model Olympus PEN E-PM1 Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
Category Entry-Level Mirrorless Advanced Mirrorless
Released 2011-11-23 2009-11-10
Body design Rangefinder-style mirrorless Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Processor Chip TruePic VI GR engine III
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds APS-C
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 23.6 x 15.7mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 370.5mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixels 12 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 4032 x 3024 4288 x 2848
Maximum native ISO 12800 3200
Lowest native ISO 100 200
RAW data
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch focus
Continuous AF
Single AF
Tracking AF
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Number of focus points 35 -
Lens
Lens mounting type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 50mm (1x)
Highest aperture - f/2.5
Macro focus distance - 1cm
Total lenses 107 -
Crop factor 2.1 1.5
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display sizing 3 inches 3 inches
Display resolution 460k dot 920k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Display technology HyperCrystal LCD AR(Anti-Reflective) coating -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic (optional) Electronic (optional)
Features
Lowest shutter speed 60 seconds 180 seconds
Highest shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/3200 seconds
Continuous shooting speed 6.0 frames per second 3.0 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range no built-in flash 3.00 m
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Highest flash sync 1/160 seconds -
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (24 fps), 320 x 240 (24 fps)
Maximum video resolution 1920x1080 1280x720
Video format AVCHD, Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 265g (0.58 lbs) 453g (1.00 lbs)
Physical dimensions 110 x 64 x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") 114 x 70 x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0")
DXO scores
DXO All around score 52 not tested
DXO Color Depth score 21.0 not tested
DXO Dynamic range score 10.3 not tested
DXO Low light score 499 not tested
Other
Battery life 330 shots 320 shots
Battery format Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model BLS-5 -
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) )
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC, Internal
Storage slots Single Single
Retail price $499 $566