Olympus E-PM1 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
89 Imaging
48 Features
52 Overall
49
85 Imaging
34 Features
44 Overall
38
Olympus E-PM1 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 265g - 110 x 64 x 34mm
- Released November 2011
- Renewed by Olympus E-PM2
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-72mm (F2.5-4.4) lens
- 355g - 114 x 70 x 44mm
- Revealed March 2010
Olympus E-PM1 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Overview
Here is a detailed review of the Olympus E-PM1 and Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by companies Olympus and Ricoh. The resolution of the E-PM1 (12MP) and the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (10MP) is very close but the E-PM1 (Four Thirds) and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (1/1.7") offer different sensor size.
Photography GlossaryThe E-PM1 was revealed 21 months later than the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC making them a generation apart from one another. Both cameras have the same body design (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before we go straight to a full comparison, here is a brief synopsis of how the E-PM1 scores vs the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus E-PM1 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus PEN E-PM1 & Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC. The full galleries are available at Olympus E-PM1 Gallery & Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PM1 over the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
E-PM1 | GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | November 2011 | March 2010 | Fresher by 21 months |
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC over the Olympus E-PM1
GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | E-PM1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display resolution | 920k | 460k | Clearer display (+460k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-PM1 and Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
E-PM1 | GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | More accurate focus | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal display size | |
Selfie screen | Neither has selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | No Touch friendly display |
Olympus E-PM1 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Physical Comparison
When you are planning to carry your camera frequently, you have to factor its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-PM1 has exterior measurements of 110mm x 64mm x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") having a weight of 265 grams (0.58 lbs) while the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC has proportions of 114mm x 70mm x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") along with a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus E-PM1 and Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you choose at the time. Here is a front view proportions comparison of the E-PM1 vs the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-PM1 and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC is 89 and 85 respectively.
Olympus E-PM1 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it's difficult to visualize the gap in sensor sizing merely by researching specs. The visual below will help give you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the E-PM1 and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC.
All in all, each of these cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The E-PM1 having a larger sensor is going to make achieving shallow depth of field simpler and the Olympus E-PM1 will render more detail because of its extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop images a bit more aggressively. The more recent E-PM1 provides an advantage when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus E-PM1 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-PM1 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PM1 | Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Ricoh |
Model | Olympus PEN E-PM1 | Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC |
Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Advanced Mirrorless |
Released | 2011-11-23 | 2010-03-18 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic VI | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/1.7" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 10MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 3648 x 2736 |
Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Number of focus points | 35 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 24-72mm (3.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/2.5-4.4 |
Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
Amount of lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 460k dot | 920k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Display technology | HyperCrystal LCD AR(Anti-Reflective) coating | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60s | 180s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 6.0 frames/s | 2.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 4.50 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | 1/160s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video file format | AVCHD, Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 265 grams (0.58 lb) | 355 grams (0.78 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 110 x 64 x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 114 x 70 x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 52 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 21.0 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.3 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 499 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 330 shots | 410 shots |
Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLS-5 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail price | $499 | $349 |