Clicky

Olympus E-PM1 vs Sigma Quattro

Portability
89
Imaging
48
Features
52
Overall
49
Olympus PEN E-PM1 front
 
Sigma sd Quattro front
Portability
63
Imaging
69
Features
56
Overall
63

Olympus E-PM1 vs Sigma Quattro Key Specs

Olympus E-PM1
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 12800
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 265g - 110 x 64 x 34mm
  • Launched November 2011
  • Successor is Olympus E-PM2
Sigma Quattro
(Full Review)
  • 29MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sigma SA Mount
  • 625g - 147 x 95 x 91mm
  • Revealed February 2016
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Olympus E-PM1 vs Sigma Quattro Overview

The following is a comprehensive analysis of the Olympus E-PM1 and Sigma Quattro, one is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by companies Olympus and Sigma. There exists a big gap between the sensor resolutions of the E-PM1 (12MP) and Quattro (29MP) and the E-PM1 (Four Thirds) and Quattro (APS-C) have different sensor sizing.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

The E-PM1 was released 5 years earlier than the Quattro which is quite a big gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras have the same body design (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).

Before diving right into a full comparison, here is a simple view of how the E-PM1 scores vs the Quattro for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-PM1 over the Sigma Quattro

 E-PM1 Quattro 

Reasons to pick Sigma Quattro over the Olympus E-PM1

 Quattro E-PM1 
RevealedFebruary 2016November 2011Newer by 51 months
Screen resolution1620k460kClearer screen (+1160k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-PM1 and Sigma Quattro

 E-PM1 Quattro 
Manual focus Very precise focusing
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen dimensions3"3"Equal screen measurement
Selfie screen Neither offers selfie screen
Touch friendly screen No Touch friendly screen

Olympus E-PM1 vs Sigma Quattro Physical Comparison

If you are looking to travel with your camera frequently, you are going to need to factor in its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-PM1 offers exterior dimensions of 110mm x 64mm x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 265 grams (0.58 lbs) while the Sigma Quattro has measurements of 147mm x 95mm x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") accompanied by a weight of 625 grams (1.38 lbs).

Compare the Olympus E-PM1 and Sigma Quattro in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you select at that moment. Underneath is a front view sizing comparison of the E-PM1 versus the Quattro.

Olympus E-PM1 vs Sigma Quattro size comparison

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-PM1 and Quattro is 89 and 63 respectively.

Olympus E-PM1 vs Sigma Quattro top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-PM1 vs Sigma Quattro Sensor Comparison

More often than not, its tough to picture the difference between sensor dimensions simply by reading through specs. The picture below will give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the E-PM1 and Quattro.

As you can plainly see, both the cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The E-PM1 because of its tinier sensor is going to make achieving shallower depth of field more challenging and the Sigma Quattro will resolve more detail as a result of its extra 17MP. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop shots a bit more aggressively. The more aged E-PM1 is going to be behind in sensor technology.

Olympus E-PM1 vs Sigma Quattro sensor size comparison

Olympus E-PM1 vs Sigma Quattro Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-PM1 vs Sigma Quattro Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-PM1 Portrait photography details
Sigma Quattro Portrait photography details
60
has manual focus
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
includes face detect autofocus
supports RAW formats
MP count low (12 megapixels)
81
you can focus manually
megapixel count high (29 megapixels)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
features face detect autofocus
saves RAW formats
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Street Comparison

Olympus E-PM1 Street photography factors
Sigma Quattro Street photography factors
75
image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
supports RAW formats
fixed screen
59
decent sensor size (APS-C)
saves RAW formats
environment sealing
no articulating screen
no image stabilization
more heavy than competition (625 grams)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-PM1 Sports photography details
Sigma Quattro Sports photography details
49
image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
includes tracking focus
very slow continuous shooting (6.0 frames per second)
MP count low (12 megapixels)
lack of phase detect autofocus
70
megapixel count high (29MP)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
features tracking focus
environment sealing
supports phase detect autofocus
max frames per second very slow (3.8 frames per second)
no image stabilization
Photography Glossary

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Olympus E-PM1
Travel photography with Sigma Quattro
45
doesn't have Timelapse mode
MP count low (12 megapixels)
screen is not selfie friendly
55
environment sealing
megapixel count high (29 megapixels)
doesn't have Timelapse function
more heavy than competition (625 grams)
doesn't feature selfie friendly display
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-PM1 Landscape photography info
Sigma Quattro Landscape photography info
65
has manual focus
change lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen size is decent (3 inch)
image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
supports RAW formats
MP count low (12MP)
doesn't have Timelapse mode
72
you can focus manually
interchangeable lenses (Sigma SA mount)
screen is a good size (3")
megapixel count high (29MP)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
saves RAW formats
environment sealing
no image stabilization
doesn't have Timelapse function
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-PM1 as a Vlogging camera
Sigma Quattro as a Vlogging camera
34
image stabilization (Sensor based)
includes face detect autofocus
good video quality (1920 x 1080 pixels)
screen is not selfie friendly
doesn't have microphone support
22
features face detect autofocus
doesn't feature selfie friendly display
no image stabilization
low quality video ( resolution)
doesn't have microphone port
more heavy than competition (625 grams)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Olympus E-PM1 vs Sigma Quattro Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-PM1 and Sigma Quattro
 Olympus PEN E-PM1Sigma sd Quattro
General Information
Brand Name Olympus Sigma
Model type Olympus PEN E-PM1 Sigma sd Quattro
Class Entry-Level Mirrorless Advanced Mirrorless
Launched 2011-11-23 2016-02-23
Body design Rangefinder-style mirrorless Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Processor Chip TruePic VI Dual TRUE III
Sensor type CMOS CMOS (Foveon X3)
Sensor size Four Thirds APS-C
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 23.5 x 15.6mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 366.6mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixels 29 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Full resolution 4032 x 3024 5424 x 3616
Max native ISO 12800 6400
Minimum native ISO 100 100
RAW images
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Single autofocus
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detect focus
Contract detect focus
Phase detect focus
Total focus points 35 9
Lens
Lens mount type Micro Four Thirds Sigma SA
Total lenses 107 76
Focal length multiplier 2.1 1.5
Screen
Range of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display diagonal 3 inches 3 inches
Display resolution 460 thousand dot 1,620 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Display tech HyperCrystal LCD AR(Anti-Reflective) coating -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic (optional) Electronic
Viewfinder resolution - 2,360 thousand dot
Viewfinder coverage - 100%
Viewfinder magnification - 0.73x
Features
Slowest shutter speed 60 secs 30 secs
Maximum shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/4000 secs
Continuous shooting speed 6.0 frames/s 3.8 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance no built-in flash no built-in flash
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) no built-in flash
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Maximum flash sync 1/160 secs -
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) -
Max video resolution 1920x1080 -
Video format AVCHD, Motion JPEG -
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 265g (0.58 pounds) 625g (1.38 pounds)
Physical dimensions 110 x 64 x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") 147 x 95 x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating 52 not tested
DXO Color Depth rating 21.0 not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating 10.3 not tested
DXO Low light rating 499 not tested
Other
Battery life 330 pictures -
Type of battery Battery Pack -
Battery ID BLS-5 BP-61
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC/SDXC
Storage slots One One
Price at launch $499 $738