Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus SZ-16 iHS
89 Imaging
52 Features
63 Overall
56
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/44feb/44feb07953aefdecd1c932b892c37c909755f51a" alt="Olympus PEN E-PM2 front Olympus PEN E-PM2 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a7e21/a7e2113adb5f22cfd856c9b9ebf2ca5403c26cd4" alt="Olympus SZ-16 iHS front Olympus SZ-16 iHS front"
89 Imaging
39 Features
36 Overall
37
Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus SZ-16 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 269g - 110 x 64 x 34mm
- Introduced May 2013
- Succeeded the Olympus E-PM1
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 226g - 108 x 70 x 40mm
- Introduced January 2013
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus SZ-16 iHS Overview
Below, we are matching up the Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus SZ-16 iHS, former is a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom and both are built by Olympus. The resolution of the E-PM2 (16MP) and the SZ-16 iHS (16MP) is very well matched but the E-PM2 (Four Thirds) and SZ-16 iHS (1/2.3") come with totally different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
The E-PM2 was introduced 5 months after the SZ-16 iHS and they are of a similar age. The two cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-PM2 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus SZ-16 iHS being a Compact camera.
Before delving in to a thorough comparison, below is a short highlight of how the E-PM2 scores against the SZ-16 iHS with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus SZ-16 iHS Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus PEN E-PM2 & Olympus SZ-16 iHS. The whole galleries are available at Olympus E-PM2 Gallery & Olympus SZ-16 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PM2 over the Olympus SZ-16 iHS
E-PM2 | SZ-16 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Very accurate focus | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus SZ-16 iHS over the Olympus E-PM2
SZ-16 iHS | E-PM2 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-PM2 and Olympus SZ-16 iHS
E-PM2 | SZ-16 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | May 2013 | ![]() | January 2013 | Similar age |
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical display measurements |
Display resolution | 460k | ![]() | 460k | The same display resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither has selfie screen |
Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus SZ-16 iHS Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to carry around your camera, you have to take into account its weight and size. The Olympus E-PM2 has outside measurements of 110mm x 64mm x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") along with a weight of 269 grams (0.59 lbs) whilst the Olympus SZ-16 iHS has specifications of 108mm x 70mm x 40mm (4.3" x 2.8" x 1.6") accompanied by a weight of 226 grams (0.50 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus SZ-16 iHS in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are using at that time. Here is the front view measurements comparison of the E-PM2 and the SZ-16 iHS.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a2ac3/a2ac3d01ed5adc1be2caf5dcacd502a1c057e270" alt="Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus SZ-16 iHS size comparison Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus SZ-16 iHS size comparison"
Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-PM2 and SZ-16 iHS is 89 and 89 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/53014/53014726d1f572a1c8945471e47d68027659368b" alt="Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus SZ-16 iHS top view buttons comparison Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus SZ-16 iHS top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus SZ-16 iHS Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is very difficult to see the gap between sensor sizes simply by looking at technical specs. The pic below might provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the E-PM2 and SZ-16 iHS.
As you have seen, the 2 cameras posses the exact same megapixels but not the same sensor sizes. The E-PM2 provides the larger sensor which is going to make achieving shallow depth of field less difficult.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4027e/4027e8ecb8575c8251beb1f0c18aa04bb78c16c9" alt="Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus SZ-16 iHS sensor size comparison Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus SZ-16 iHS sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus SZ-16 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a73b2/a73b28c149e000180623c075ed9fce9c567c5737" alt="Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus SZ-16 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus SZ-16 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus SZ-16 iHS Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PM2 | Olympus SZ-16 iHS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus PEN E-PM2 | Olympus SZ-16 iHS |
Category | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2013-05-21 | 2013-01-08 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | - |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 80 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 35 | - |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 25-600mm (24.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/3.0-6.9 |
Number of lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 460 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Display tech | - | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60s | 4s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 8.0fps | 2.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 7.00 m (bundled FL-LM1) | - |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | 1/250s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 269g (0.59 pounds) | 226g (0.50 pounds) |
Dimensions | 110 x 64 x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 108 x 70 x 40mm (4.3" x 2.8" x 1.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 72 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 22.7 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.2 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 932 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 360 photographs | 220 photographs |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLS-5 | LI-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Retail pricing | $448 | $230 |