Clicky

Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus TG-310

Portability
89
Imaging
52
Features
63
Overall
56
Olympus PEN E-PM2 front
 
Olympus TG-310 front
Portability
94
Imaging
37
Features
33
Overall
35

Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus TG-310 Key Specs

Olympus E-PM2
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 269g - 110 x 64 x 34mm
  • Revealed May 2013
  • Succeeded the Olympus E-PM1
Olympus TG-310
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-102mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
  • 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
  • Released January 2011
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus TG-310 Overview

Following is a extended analysis of the Olympus E-PM2 and Olympus TG-310, one is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the latter is a Waterproof and both are designed by Olympus. The image resolution of the E-PM2 (16MP) and the TG-310 (14MP) is relatively comparable but the E-PM2 (Four Thirds) and TG-310 (1/2.3") boast totally different sensor measurements.

Photography Glossary

The E-PM2 was released 2 years after the TG-310 which is a fairly significant gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-PM2 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus TG-310 being a Compact camera.

Before getting into a in-depth comparison, here is a concise summary of how the E-PM2 matches up vs the TG-310 for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-PM2 over the Olympus TG-310

 E-PM2 TG-310 
ReleasedMay 2013January 2011More modern by 29 months
Focus manually Very accurate focusing
Screen dimensions3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution460k230kSharper screen (+230k dot)
Touch screen Quickly navigate

Reasons to pick Olympus TG-310 over the Olympus E-PM2

 TG-310 E-PM2 

Common features in the Olympus E-PM2 and Olympus TG-310

 E-PM2 TG-310 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Lack of selfie screen

Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus TG-310 Physical Comparison

If you're looking to carry around your camera, you need to think about its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-PM2 has outer dimensions of 110mm x 64mm x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") having a weight of 269 grams (0.59 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-310 has dimensions of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") along with a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs).

Take a look at the Olympus E-PM2 and Olympus TG-310 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are working with at the time. Below is a front view scale comparison of the E-PM2 versus the TG-310.

Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus TG-310 size comparison

Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the E-PM2 and TG-310 is 89 and 94 respectively.

Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus TG-310 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus TG-310 Sensor Comparison

Often, it's tough to envision the difference in sensor sizes merely by seeing technical specs. The image here should give you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-PM2 and TG-310.

As you have seen, each of the cameras have different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The E-PM2 because of its bigger sensor will make getting bokeh less difficult and the Olympus E-PM2 will show extra detail as a result of its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop shots a bit more aggressively. The more recent E-PM2 will have a benefit with regard to sensor tech.

Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus TG-310 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus TG-310 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus TG-310 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Olympus E-PM2
Portrait photography with Olympus TG-310
71
you can focus manually
MP count good (16 megapixels)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
offers face detection focusing
supports RAW formats
33
megapixel count good (14MP)
comes with face detection focusing
no manual focus
no manual mode
external flash not possible
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Street Comparison

Olympus E-PM2 Street photography info
Olympus TG-310 Street photography info
79
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports RAW formats
comes with touch to focus
above average high ISO (25,600)
screen is fixed
66
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
weather proof
lighter than competitors (155g)
no articulating screen
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-PM2 as a Sports photography camera
Olympus TG-310 as a Sports photography camera
66
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
MP count good (16MP)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
offers tracking autofocus
lacks phase detect AF
40
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count good (14MP)
comes with tracking autofocus
weather proof
painfully slow continuous shooting (1.0 fps)
no shutter priority mode
sensor is small (1/2.3")
terrible battery power (150 per charge)
lack of phase detect AF
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Olympus E-PM2
Travel photography with Olympus TG-310
66
comes with touch to focus
MP count good (16MP)
lack of Timelapse function
does not offer selfie friendly display
67
lighter than competitors (155g)
weather proof
megapixel count good (14MP)
has built in flash
fairly wide (28mm)
does not have Timelapse mode
terrible battery power (150 per charge)
display is not selfie friendly
slow max aperture (f3.9)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Olympus E-PM2
Landscape photography with Olympus TG-310
74
you can focus manually
interchangeable lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen size is good (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
MP count good (16 megapixels)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
above average high ISO (25,600)
supports RAW formats
lack of Timelapse function
39
fairly wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count good (14MP)
weather proof
no manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f3.9)
tiny screen (2.7 inch)
no manual mode
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
terrible battery power (150 CIPA)
does not have Timelapse mode
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-PM2 Vlogging features
Olympus TG-310 Vlogging features
36
has touchscreen
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
offers face detection focusing
high res video (1920 x 1080 pxls)
does not offer selfie friendly display
lack of external microphone socket
32
fairly wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
comes with face detection focusing
lighter than competitors (155g)
slow max aperture (f3.9)
display is not selfie friendly
low res video (1280 x 720 pxls)
does not have external microphone socket
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus TG-310 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-PM2 and Olympus TG-310
 Olympus PEN E-PM2Olympus TG-310
General Information
Brand Name Olympus Olympus
Model type Olympus PEN E-PM2 Olympus TG-310
Class Entry-Level Mirrorless Waterproof
Revealed 2013-05-21 2011-01-06
Physical type Rangefinder-style mirrorless Compact
Sensor Information
Powered by - TruePic III+
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixel 14 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 -
Maximum resolution 4608 x 3456 4288 x 3216
Maximum native ISO 25600 1600
Lowest native ISO 200 80
RAW support
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Touch focus
Continuous AF
AF single
Tracking AF
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Total focus points 35 -
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens support Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 28-102mm (3.6x)
Max aperture - f/3.9-5.9
Macro focusing range - 3cm
Number of lenses 107 -
Crop factor 2.1 5.8
Screen
Type of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display diagonal 3 inch 2.7 inch
Display resolution 460 thousand dots 230 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Display tech - TFT Color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic (optional) None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 60s 4s
Highest shutter speed 1/4000s 1/2000s
Continuous shooting rate 8.0fps 1.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes -
Set WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 7.00 m (bundled FL-LM1) 4.20 m
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in
External flash
AEB
White balance bracketing
Highest flash synchronize 1/250s -
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps)
Maximum video resolution 1920x1080 1280x720
Video format MPEG-4, H.264, Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless Eye-Fi Connected Eye-Fi Connected
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 269 gr (0.59 lb) 155 gr (0.34 lb)
Physical dimensions 110 x 64 x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating 72 not tested
DXO Color Depth rating 22.7 not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating 12.2 not tested
DXO Low light rating 932 not tested
Other
Battery life 360 photos 150 photos
Form of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery ID BLS-5 LI-42B
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse recording
Storage type SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC/SDXC
Card slots Single Single
Price at launch $448 $0