Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus TG-3
89 Imaging
52 Features
63 Overall
56
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/44feb/44feb07953aefdecd1c932b892c37c909755f51a" alt="Olympus PEN E-PM2 front Olympus PEN E-PM2 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c62ad/c62adda3df33c555b7142020fb576a7ad037cf6b" alt="Olympus Tough TG-3 front Olympus Tough TG-3 front"
90 Imaging
40 Features
46 Overall
42
Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus TG-3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 269g - 110 x 64 x 34mm
- Launched May 2013
- Old Model is Olympus E-PM1
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 247g - 112 x 66 x 31mm
- Revealed March 2014
- Successor is Olympus TG-4
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus TG-3 Overview
Let's look a bit more closely at the Olympus E-PM2 versus Olympus TG-3, former is a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Waterproof and both are created by Olympus. The resolution of the E-PM2 (16MP) and the TG-3 (16MP) is pretty well matched but the E-PM2 (Four Thirds) and TG-3 (1/2.3") use different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
The E-PM2 was brought out 10 months earlier than the TG-3 and they are of a similar age. The two cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-PM2 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus TG-3 being a Compact camera.
Before delving through a complete comparison, below is a quick view of how the E-PM2 scores versus the TG-3 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus TG-3 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus PEN E-PM2 & Olympus Tough TG-3. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus E-PM2 Gallery & Olympus TG-3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PM2 over the Olympus TG-3
E-PM2 | TG-3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | More exact focusing | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-3 over the Olympus E-PM2
TG-3 | E-PM2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | March 2014 | ![]() | May 2013 | More modern by 10 months |
Common features in the Olympus E-PM2 and Olympus TG-3
E-PM2 | TG-3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent screen sizing |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 460k | The same screen resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither contains selfie screen |
Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus TG-3 Physical Comparison
If you are intending to carry around your camera frequently, you will have to consider its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-PM2 has got outside dimensions of 110mm x 64mm x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") along with a weight of 269 grams (0.59 lbs) while the Olympus TG-3 has proportions of 112mm x 66mm x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") and a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus E-PM2 versus Olympus TG-3 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are utilizing at the time. Below is the front view dimensions comparison of the E-PM2 and the TG-3.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/677c2/677c25204ae82f90d5067cfed21bc456592c71e6" alt="Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus TG-3 size comparison Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus TG-3 size comparison"
Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the E-PM2 and TG-3 is 89 and 90 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/56618/566188239a32179db5db78e66eca65ec835636d1" alt="Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus TG-3 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus TG-3 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus TG-3 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is very hard to imagine the gap between sensor sizes only by reading through technical specs. The pic below will help provide you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-PM2 and TG-3.
As you have seen, both cameras offer the same exact resolution albeit different sensor sizes. The E-PM2 provides the bigger sensor which will make obtaining shallower DOF less difficult. The more aged E-PM2 is going to be behind in sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2cd41/2cd41ed864279a54c40987f4cc584849d3120a46" alt="Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus TG-3 sensor size comparison Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus TG-3 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus TG-3 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8db65/8db65fd4a638ccc1d6cf54bd303f45306779b829" alt="Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus TG-3 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus TG-3 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus TG-3 Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PM2 | Olympus Tough TG-3 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus PEN E-PM2 | Olympus Tough TG-3 |
Category | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Waterproof |
Launched | 2013-05-21 | 2014-03-31 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | TruePic VII |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 3:2 |
Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 35 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/2.0-4.9 |
Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
Available lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 460 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen technology | - | TFT-LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60s | 4s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter rate | 8.0 frames per second | 5.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 7.00 m (bundled FL-LM1) | - |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off, LED |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | 1/250s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264, Motion JPEG | H.264, Motion JPEG |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 269 gr (0.59 lb) | 247 gr (0.54 lb) |
Dimensions | 110 x 64 x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 112 x 66 x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 72 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 22.7 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.2 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 932 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 360 pictures | 330 pictures |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLS-5 | LI-92B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at release | $448 | $350 |