Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus VG-120
89 Imaging
52 Features
63 Overall
56
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/44feb/44feb07953aefdecd1c932b892c37c909755f51a" alt="Olympus PEN E-PM2 front Olympus PEN E-PM2 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2d8a9/2d8a95487a0964a4254d1d693e044bf6a741f7bd" alt="Olympus VG-120 front Olympus VG-120 front"
96 Imaging
37 Features
24 Overall
31
Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus VG-120 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 269g - 110 x 64 x 34mm
- Launched May 2013
- Superseded the Olympus E-PM1
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 120g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
- Announced January 2011
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus VG-120 Overview
Here, we will be contrasting the Olympus E-PM2 and Olympus VG-120, former is a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Ultracompact and they are both designed by Olympus. The sensor resolution of the E-PM2 (16MP) and the VG-120 (14MP) is pretty well matched but the E-PM2 (Four Thirds) and VG-120 (1/2.3") have totally different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
The E-PM2 was manufactured 2 years after the VG-120 which is quite a significant difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-PM2 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus VG-120 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before delving straight to a thorough comparison, here is a quick introduction of how the E-PM2 grades versus the VG-120 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus VG-120 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus PEN E-PM2 & Olympus VG-120. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus E-PM2 Gallery & Olympus VG-120 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PM2 over the Olympus VG-120
E-PM2 | VG-120 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | May 2013 | ![]() | January 2011 | Newer by 29 months |
Manual focus | ![]() | More precise focusing | ||
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) |
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus VG-120 over the Olympus E-PM2
VG-120 | E-PM2 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-PM2 and Olympus VG-120
E-PM2 | VG-120 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same screen sizing |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Absent selfie screen |
Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus VG-120 Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to travel with your camera regularly, you should factor in its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-PM2 offers external dimensions of 110mm x 64mm x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") along with a weight of 269 grams (0.59 lbs) while the Olympus VG-120 has proportions of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 120 grams (0.26 lbs).
Look at the Olympus E-PM2 and Olympus VG-120 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are working with at the time. The following is a front view dimension comparison of the E-PM2 vs the VG-120.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e2bac/e2baca7491afd4665f4439f6aa4134655c283bea" alt="Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus VG-120 size comparison Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus VG-120 size comparison"
Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the E-PM2 and VG-120 is 89 and 96 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4401f/4401f38c37a0500c066f8b7292d127fce37e66af" alt="Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus VG-120 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus VG-120 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus VG-120 Sensor Comparison
Often, its tough to see the difference between sensor dimensions purely by looking at technical specs. The pic below might provide you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-PM2 and VG-120.
As you have seen, each of these cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The E-PM2 featuring a bigger sensor will make getting shallow DOF easier and the Olympus E-PM2 will give you more detail due to its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will allow you to crop pictures a good deal more aggressively. The newer E-PM2 is going to have an advantage in sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/22dd7/22dd7fabf4cdfca3d45d4afee9f454c5e0dec4a4" alt="Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus VG-120 sensor size comparison Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus VG-120 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus VG-120 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d853b/d853b8a190f51408dedd93579b1f0b9cba6512e0" alt="Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus VG-120 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus VG-120 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus VG-120 Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PM2 | Olympus VG-120 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus PEN E-PM2 | Olympus VG-120 |
Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Ultracompact |
Launched | 2013-05-21 | 2011-01-06 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | TruePic III |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 14MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 |
Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 3216 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 1600 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 80 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 35 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/2.8-6.5 |
Macro focus range | - | 7cm |
Available lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 460k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen tech | - | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60s | 4s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter rate | 8.0 frames per sec | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 7.00 m (bundled FL-LM1) | 4.40 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | 1/250s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264, Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 269 gr (0.59 pounds) | 120 gr (0.26 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 110 x 64 x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 72 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 22.7 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.2 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 932 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 360 pictures | 160 pictures |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLS-5 | LI-70B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Price at release | $448 | $190 |