Olympus E-PM2 vs Pentax K20D
89 Imaging
52 Features
63 Overall
56
59 Imaging
53 Features
52 Overall
52
Olympus E-PM2 vs Pentax K20D Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 269g - 110 x 64 x 34mm
- Released May 2013
- Older Model is Olympus E-PM1
(Full Review)
- 15MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Push to 6400)
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Pentax KAF2 Mount
- 800g - 142 x 101 x 70mm
- Released June 2008
- Previous Model is Pentax K10D
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus E-PM2 vs Pentax K20D Overview
Let's take a more detailed look at the Olympus E-PM2 and Pentax K20D, former is a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Advanced DSLR by brands Olympus and Pentax. The resolution of the E-PM2 (16MP) and the K20D (15MP) is pretty well matched but the E-PM2 (Four Thirds) and K20D (APS-C) offer totally different sensor sizes.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe E-PM2 was unveiled 4 years after the K20D which is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-PM2 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Pentax K20D being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before diving straight to a in-depth comparison, here is a quick summary of how the E-PM2 matches up against the K20D for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus E-PM2 vs Pentax K20D Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus PEN E-PM2 & Pentax K20D. The full galleries are provided at Olympus E-PM2 Gallery & Pentax K20D Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PM2 over the Pentax K20D
| E-PM2 | K20D | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | May 2013 | June 2008 | Newer by 60 months | |
| Screen dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
| Screen resolution | 460k | 230k | Crisper screen (+230k dot) | |
| Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Pentax K20D over the Olympus E-PM2
| K20D | E-PM2 |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus E-PM2 and Pentax K20D
| E-PM2 | K20D | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | Dial precise focus | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen |
Olympus E-PM2 vs Pentax K20D Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to travel with your camera often, you have to factor in its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-PM2 has got outer dimensions of 110mm x 64mm x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") having a weight of 269 grams (0.59 lbs) while the Pentax K20D has measurements of 142mm x 101mm x 70mm (5.6" x 4.0" x 2.8") along with a weight of 800 grams (1.76 lbs).
See the Olympus E-PM2 and Pentax K20D in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you have at the time. Underneath is a front view measurement comparison of the E-PM2 and the K20D.

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-PM2 and K20D is 89 and 59 respectively.
Olympus E-PM2 vs Pentax K20D Sensor Comparison
Normally, it can be difficult to visualise the difference between sensor dimensions simply by reading through a spec sheet. The picture here will offer you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-PM2 and K20D.
As you can see, both of those cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The E-PM2 having a tinier sensor will make getting bokeh harder and the Olympus E-PM2 will give you extra detail having an extra 1 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop photographs a bit more aggressively. The fresher E-PM2 is going to have an edge in sensor technology.
Olympus E-PM2 vs Pentax K20D Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Olympus E-PM2 vs Pentax K20D Specifications
| Olympus PEN E-PM2 | Pentax K20D | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Pentax |
| Model type | Olympus PEN E-PM2 | Pentax K20D |
| Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Advanced DSLR |
| Released | 2013-05-21 | 2008-06-25 |
| Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Mid-size SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 23.4 x 15.6mm |
| Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 365.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 15 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 3:2 |
| Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4672 x 3104 |
| Max native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
| Max enhanced ISO | - | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 200 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Total focus points | 35 | 11 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | Pentax KAF2 |
| Available lenses | 107 | 151 |
| Crop factor | 2.1 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Resolution of display | 460 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | Optical (pentaprism) |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 95% |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.64x |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 60 secs | 30 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 8.0 frames per sec | 3.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 7.00 m (bundled FL-LM1) | 13.00 m (at ISO 100) |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | Auto, Red-Eye, Slow, Red-Eye Slow, Rear curtain, wireless |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Fastest flash sync | 1/250 secs | 1/180 secs |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | - |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264, Motion JPEG | - |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 269g (0.59 pounds) | 800g (1.76 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 110 x 64 x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 142 x 101 x 70mm (5.6" x 4.0" x 2.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | 72 | 65 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 22.7 | 22.9 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.2 | 11.1 |
| DXO Low light rating | 932 | 639 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 360 photos | - |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | BLS-5 | D-LI50 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/MMC/SDHC card |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Retail pricing | $448 | $700 |