Clicky

Olympus E-330 vs Sony NEX-5N

Portability
65
Imaging
41
Features
40
Overall
40
Olympus E-330 front
 
Sony Alpha NEX-5N front
Portability
89
Imaging
56
Features
69
Overall
61

Olympus E-330 vs Sony NEX-5N Key Specs

Olympus E-330
(Full Review)
  • 7MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.5" Tilting Display
  • ISO 100 - 400 (Push to 1600)
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 616g - 140 x 87 x 72mm
  • Revealed March 2006
  • Alternative Name is EVOLT E-330
  • Old Model is Olympus E-300
  • Renewed by Olympus E-450
Sony NEX-5N
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Display
  • ISO 100 - 25600
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Sony E Mount
  • 269g - 111 x 59 x 38mm
  • Launched October 2011
  • Superseded the Sony NEX-5
  • New Model is Sony NEX-5R
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Olympus E-330 vs Sony NEX-5N Overview

Following is a complete review of the Olympus E-330 and Sony NEX-5N, one is a Advanced DSLR and the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by competitors Olympus and Sony. There exists a significant gap among the image resolutions of the E-330 (7MP) and NEX-5N (16MP) and the E-330 (Four Thirds) and NEX-5N (APS-C) enjoy different sensor dimensions.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The E-330 was unveiled 6 years earlier than the NEX-5N which is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-330 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Sony NEX-5N being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.

Before getting in to a more detailed comparison, below is a quick overview of how the E-330 scores versus the NEX-5N with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-330 over the Sony NEX-5N

 E-330 NEX-5N 

Reasons to pick Sony NEX-5N over the Olympus E-330

 NEX-5N E-330 
LaunchedOctober 2011March 2006More modern by 67 months
Display dimension3"2.5"Larger display (+0.5")
Display resolution920k215kSharper display (+705k dot)
Touch friendly display Easily navigate

Common features in the Olympus E-330 and Sony NEX-5N

 E-330 NEX-5N 
Focus manually Very precise focus
Display typeTiltingTiltingTilting display
Selfie screen Lack of selfie screen

Olympus E-330 vs Sony NEX-5N Physical Comparison

When you are planning to carry around your camera often, you will want to think about its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-330 enjoys physical measurements of 140mm x 87mm x 72mm (5.5" x 3.4" x 2.8") and a weight of 616 grams (1.36 lbs) whilst the Sony NEX-5N has measurements of 111mm x 59mm x 38mm (4.4" x 2.3" x 1.5") along with a weight of 269 grams (0.59 lbs).

Take a look at the Olympus E-330 and Sony NEX-5N in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you select during that time. The following is the front view physical size comparison of the E-330 versus the NEX-5N.

Olympus E-330 vs Sony NEX-5N size comparison

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-330 and NEX-5N is 65 and 89 respectively.

Olympus E-330 vs Sony NEX-5N top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-330 vs Sony NEX-5N Sensor Comparison

Quite often, it's tough to visualize the difference in sensor sizes only by viewing specs. The pic underneath will offer you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-330 and NEX-5N.

All in all, both of the cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The E-330 with its smaller sensor is going to make shooting shallow depth of field trickier and the Sony NEX-5N will result in more detail having an extra 9 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop photos somewhat more aggressively. The more aged E-330 will be behind when it comes to sensor technology.

Olympus E-330 vs Sony NEX-5N sensor size comparison

Olympus E-330 vs Sony NEX-5N Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-330 vs Sony NEX-5N Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photography Glossary

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Olympus E-330
Portrait photography with Sony NEX-5N
54
has manual focus
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
MP count low (7 megapixels)
73
focusing manually
MP count good (16 megapixels)
good sensor size (APS-C)
provides face detect focusing
delivers RAW files
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Street Comparison

Olympus E-330 Street photography info
Sony NEX-5N Street photography info
60
has a tilting screen
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
lighter than average in class (616 grams)
no image stabilization
max ISO too low (400)
80
has a tilting screen
good sensor size (APS-C)
delivers RAW files
comes with touch focus
above average high ISO (25,600)
no image stabilization
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Olympus E-330
Sports photography with Sony NEX-5N
40
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
comes with phase detect autofocus
very slow continuous shooting (3.0 fps)
no image stabilization
MP count low (7MP)
58
MP count good (16MP)
good sensor size (APS-C)
good battery life (460 CIPA)
no image stabilization
does not have phase detect AF
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Olympus E-330
Travel photography with Sony NEX-5N
50
lighter than average in class (616 grams)
built-in flash
doesn't have Time Lapse recording
MP count low (7 megapixels)
does not contain selfie friendly screen
70
good battery life (460 shots)
comes with touch focus
MP count good (16 megapixels)
lack of Timelapse recording
display isn't selfie friendly
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-330 Landscape photography factors
Sony NEX-5N Landscape photography factors
45
has manual focus
swap lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
screen is small (2.5 inch)
no image stabilization
MP count low (7 megapixels)
max ISO too low (400)
doesn't have Time Lapse recording
71
focusing manually
interchangeable lenses (Sony E mount)
good sized screen (3 inches)
MP count good (16 megapixels)
good sensor size (APS-C)
above average high ISO (25,600)
delivers RAW files
good battery life (460 shots)
no image stabilization
lack of Timelapse recording
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-330 Vlogging information
Sony NEX-5N Vlogging information
9
no video shooting
33
screen is touchscreen
provides face detect focusing
high quality video (1920 x 1080 pixels)
display isn't selfie friendly
no image stabilization
lack of microphone socket
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Olympus E-330 vs Sony NEX-5N Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-330 and Sony NEX-5N
 Olympus E-330Sony Alpha NEX-5N
General Information
Company Olympus Sony
Model Olympus E-330 Sony Alpha NEX-5N
Also referred to as EVOLT E-330 -
Category Advanced DSLR Entry-Level Mirrorless
Revealed 2006-03-18 2011-10-03
Physical type Mid-size SLR Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Processor Chip - Bionz
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds APS-C
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 23.4 x 15.6mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 365.0mm²
Sensor resolution 7 megapixel 16 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 3:2 and 16:9
Max resolution 3136 x 2352 4912 x 3264
Max native ISO 400 25600
Max enhanced ISO 1600 -
Minimum native ISO 100 100
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Single autofocus
Tracking autofocus
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Autofocus live view
Face detect autofocus
Contract detect autofocus
Phase detect autofocus
Number of focus points 3 25
Lens
Lens mounting type Micro Four Thirds Sony E
Total lenses 45 121
Focal length multiplier 2.1 1.5
Screen
Type of display Tilting Tilting
Display size 2.5 inch 3 inch
Display resolution 215 thousand dots 920 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Display tech - Tilt Up 80°, Down 45° TFT LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (pentamirror) Electronic (optional)
Viewfinder coverage 95% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.47x -
Features
Minimum shutter speed 60 seconds 30 seconds
Fastest shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/4000 seconds
Continuous shutter rate 3.0 frames per second 10.0 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range - 12.00 m
Flash settings Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Fastest flash synchronize 1/180 seconds 1/160 seconds
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions - 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Max video resolution None 1920x1080
Video data format - AVCHD
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None Eye-Fi Connected
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 616 grams (1.36 lb) 269 grams (0.59 lb)
Dimensions 140 x 87 x 72mm (5.5" x 3.4" x 2.8") 111 x 59 x 38mm (4.4" x 2.3" x 1.5")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested 77
DXO Color Depth score not tested 23.6
DXO Dynamic range score not tested 12.7
DXO Low light score not tested 1079
Other
Battery life - 460 shots
Battery type - Battery Pack
Battery model - NPFW50
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10sec (3 images))
Time lapse recording
Storage type Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo
Card slots Single Single
Retail price $1,100 $550