Olympus E-PM2 vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5
89 Imaging
53 Features
63 Overall
57
88 Imaging
53 Features
37 Overall
46
Olympus E-PM2 vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 269g - 110 x 64 x 34mm
- Announced May 2013
- Previous Model is Olympus E-PM1
(Full Review)
- 12MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 200 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28mm (F2.5) lens
- 140g - 113 x 70 x 56mm
- Revealed September 2010
Olympus E-PM2 vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Overview
The following is a complete comparison of the Olympus E-PM2 versus Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5, former is a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by companies Olympus and Ricoh. There exists a large gap among the image resolutions of the E-PM2 (16MP) and GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 (12MP) and the E-PM2 (Four Thirds) and GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 (APS-C) enjoy different sensor dimensions.
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingThe E-PM2 was launched 2 years after the GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 which is a fairly serious difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras offer the identical body type (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before getting through a full comparison, below is a quick summary of how the E-PM2 matches up versus the GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus E-PM2 vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus PEN E-PM2 & Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus E-PM2 Gallery & Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PM2 over the Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5
E-PM2 | GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | May 2013 | September 2010 | Newer by 33 months | |
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 over the Olympus E-PM2
GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 | E-PM2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display resolution | 920k | 460k | Crisper display (+460k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-PM2 and Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5
E-PM2 | GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Dial accurate focusing | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent display sizing | |
Selfie screen | Neither offers selfie screen |
Olympus E-PM2 vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to travel with your camera regularly, you'll have to take into account its weight and volume. The Olympus E-PM2 offers outer dimensions of 110mm x 64mm x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") along with a weight of 269 grams (0.59 lbs) while the Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 has sizing of 113mm x 70mm x 56mm (4.4" x 2.8" x 2.2") and a weight of 140 grams (0.31 lbs).
Check the Olympus E-PM2 versus Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are working with at that time. Underneath is the front view dimensions comparison of the E-PM2 compared to the GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-PM2 and GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 is 89 and 88 respectively.
Olympus E-PM2 vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it's hard to imagine the difference in sensor dimensions merely by going through a spec sheet. The image underneath might give you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-PM2 and GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5.
Clearly, both of the cameras offer different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The E-PM2 featuring a smaller sensor is going to make shooting shallower depth of field more challenging and the Olympus E-PM2 will provide greater detail utilizing its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop images a little more aggressively. The more recent E-PM2 should have a benefit with regard to sensor technology.
Olympus E-PM2 vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-PM2 vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PM2 | Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Ricoh |
Model | Olympus PEN E-PM2 | Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 |
Category | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Advanced Mirrorless |
Announced | 2013-05-21 | 2010-09-21 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | GR Engine III |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 23.6 x 15.7mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 370.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 12MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 2848 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 200 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | 35 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 28mm (1x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/2.5 |
Available lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 460 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Screen technology | - | TFT color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60s | 180s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/3200s |
Continuous shooting speed | 8.0fps | 5.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 7.00 m (bundled FL-LM1) | - |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | 1/250s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (24 fps), 320 x 240 (24 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 269 gr (0.59 lbs) | 140 gr (0.31 lbs) |
Dimensions | 110 x 64 x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 113 x 70 x 56mm (4.4" x 2.8" x 2.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 72 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 22.7 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.2 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 932 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 360 photographs | 320 photographs |
Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLS-5 | DB-90 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch pricing | $448 | $566 |