Olympus E-PM2 vs Sony W350
89 Imaging
51 Features
63 Overall
55
97 Imaging
36 Features
25 Overall
31
Olympus E-PM2 vs Sony W350 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 269g - 110 x 64 x 34mm
- Announced May 2013
- Succeeded the Olympus E-PM1
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-105mm (F2.7-5.7) lens
- 117g - 91 x 52 x 17mm
- Introduced January 2010
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus E-PM2 vs Sony W350 Overview
Here is a in-depth review of the Olympus E-PM2 versus Sony W350, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Ultracompact by brands Olympus and Sony. The sensor resolution of the E-PM2 (16MP) and the W350 (14MP) is relatively similar but the E-PM2 (Four Thirds) and W350 (1/2.3") possess totally different sensor size.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe E-PM2 was released 3 years later than the W350 and that is quite a large difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-PM2 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Sony W350 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before we go in to a thorough comparison, below is a quick summation of how the E-PM2 grades vs the W350 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus E-PM2 vs Sony W350 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus PEN E-PM2 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W350. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus E-PM2 Gallery & Sony W350 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PM2 over the Sony W350
| E-PM2 | W350 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | May 2013 | January 2010 | Fresher by 41 months | |
| Manual focus | Very precise focusing | |||
| Screen dimension | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
| Screen resolution | 460k | 230k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) | |
| Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony W350 over the Olympus E-PM2
| W350 | E-PM2 |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus E-PM2 and Sony W350
| E-PM2 | W350 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen |
Olympus E-PM2 vs Sony W350 Physical Comparison
If you are planning to carry your camera often, you'll have to take into account its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-PM2 has got outer dimensions of 110mm x 64mm x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") and a weight of 269 grams (0.59 lbs) and the Sony W350 has measurements of 91mm x 52mm x 17mm (3.6" x 2.0" x 0.7") along with a weight of 117 grams (0.26 lbs).
Check the Olympus E-PM2 versus Sony W350 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are employing at that time. Here is the front view overall size comparison of the E-PM2 against the W350.

Using size and weight, the portability rating of the E-PM2 and W350 is 89 and 97 respectively.
Olympus E-PM2 vs Sony W350 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is tough to see the contrast between sensor sizing purely by going over technical specs. The photograph below might offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-PM2 and W350.
As you can tell, each of these cameras posses different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The E-PM2 featuring a bigger sensor will make shooting shallower depth of field easier and the Olympus E-PM2 will offer extra detail as a result of its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also let you crop photographs somewhat more aggressively. The newer E-PM2 is going to have a benefit when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus E-PM2 vs Sony W350 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Olympus E-PM2 vs Sony W350 Specifications
| Olympus PEN E-PM2 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W350 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Sony |
| Model type | Olympus PEN E-PM2 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W350 |
| Category | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Ultracompact |
| Announced | 2013-05-21 | 2010-01-07 |
| Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | - | Bionz |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 14MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Max native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 200 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Total focus points | 35 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | - | 26-105mm (4.0x) |
| Largest aperture | - | f/2.7-5.7 |
| Macro focusing range | - | 10cm |
| Available lenses | 107 | - |
| Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3" | 2.7" |
| Resolution of display | 460 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 2 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/1600 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 8.0 frames per second | 1.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 7.00 m (bundled FL-LM1) | 3.80 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | Auto, On, Off, Slow syncro |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Maximum flash sync | 1/250 secs | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264, Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 269 gr (0.59 pounds) | 117 gr (0.26 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 110 x 64 x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 91 x 52 x 17mm (3.6" x 2.0" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | 72 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 22.7 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.2 | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | 932 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 360 shots | - |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | BLS-5 | NP-BN1 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 sec or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro HG-Duo, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at launch | $448 | $200 |