Olympus E-PM2 vs Sony W530
89 Imaging
51 Features
63 Overall
55
96 Imaging
36 Features
21 Overall
30
Olympus E-PM2 vs Sony W530 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 269g - 110 x 64 x 34mm
- Launched May 2013
- Superseded the Olympus E-PM1
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-104mm (F2.7-5.7) lens
- 113g - 93 x 53 x 19mm
- Launched January 2011
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus E-PM2 vs Sony W530 Overview
Here, we will be evaluating the Olympus E-PM2 versus Sony W530, one is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the latter is a Ultracompact by brands Olympus and Sony. The resolution of the E-PM2 (16MP) and the W530 (14MP) is pretty comparable but the E-PM2 (Four Thirds) and W530 (1/2.3") provide totally different sensor measurements.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe E-PM2 was revealed 2 years after the W530 which is a fairly large gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-PM2 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Sony W530 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before going straight to a in depth comparison, here is a concise highlight of how the E-PM2 scores vs the W530 for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus E-PM2 vs Sony W530 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus PEN E-PM2 and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W530. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus E-PM2 Gallery and Sony W530 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PM2 over the Sony W530
| E-PM2 | W530 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | May 2013 | January 2011 | More modern by 29 months | |
| Focus manually | More exact focus | |||
| Screen size | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
| Screen resolution | 460k | 230k | Crisper screen (+230k dot) | |
| Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony W530 over the Olympus E-PM2
| W530 | E-PM2 |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus E-PM2 and Sony W530
| E-PM2 | W530 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Neither includes selfie screen |
Olympus E-PM2 vs Sony W530 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to carry around your camera, you'll need to take into account its weight and volume. The Olympus E-PM2 features outside dimensions of 110mm x 64mm x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") having a weight of 269 grams (0.59 lbs) and the Sony W530 has sizing of 93mm x 53mm x 19mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.7") having a weight of 113 grams (0.25 lbs).
Compare the Olympus E-PM2 versus Sony W530 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are using at that moment. The following is a front view overall size comparison of the E-PM2 against the W530.

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-PM2 and W530 is 89 and 96 respectively.
Olympus E-PM2 vs Sony W530 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it can be tough to envision the difference in sensor sizes just by checking out a spec sheet. The image underneath may offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the E-PM2 and W530.
As you can see, both the cameras feature different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The E-PM2 with its bigger sensor will make shooting shallow DOF simpler and the Olympus E-PM2 will show more detail because of its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop pictures way more aggressively. The fresher E-PM2 will have an advantage in sensor technology.
Olympus E-PM2 vs Sony W530 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Olympus E-PM2 vs Sony W530 Specifications
| Olympus PEN E-PM2 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W530 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Sony |
| Model type | Olympus PEN E-PM2 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W530 |
| Category | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Ultracompact |
| Launched | 2013-05-21 | 2011-01-06 |
| Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | - | BIONZ |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 14MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 200 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Total focus points | 35 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | - | 26-104mm (4.0x) |
| Highest aperture | - | f/2.7-5.7 |
| Macro focusing distance | - | 5cm |
| Total lenses | 107 | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3" | 2.7" |
| Display resolution | 460 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Display tech | - | Clear Photo LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 60s | 2s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/1600s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 8.0fps | 1.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 7.00 m (bundled FL-LM1) | 3.50 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Maximum flash synchronize | 1/250s | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264, Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 269 grams (0.59 lb) | 113 grams (0.25 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 110 x 64 x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 93 x 53 x 19mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | 72 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 22.7 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.2 | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | 932 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 360 pictures | - |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | BLS-5 | NP-BN1 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Duo/Memory Stick Pro Duo, Memory Stick Pro-HG Duo |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Retail cost | $448 | $269 |