Clicky

Olympus PEN-F vs Olympus TG-310

Portability
84
Imaging
59
Features
79
Overall
67
Olympus PEN-F front
 
Olympus TG-310 front
Portability
94
Imaging
37
Features
33
Overall
35

Olympus PEN-F vs Olympus TG-310 Key Specs

Olympus PEN-F
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Screen
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • 1/8000s Max Shutter
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 427g - 125 x 72 x 37mm
  • Introduced January 2016
Olympus TG-310
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-102mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
  • 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
  • Announced January 2011
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Olympus PEN-F vs Olympus TG-310 Overview

Here is a comprehensive assessment of the Olympus PEN-F and Olympus TG-310, former being a Advanced Mirrorless while the other is a Waterproof and they are both produced by Olympus. There exists a considerable gap between the sensor resolutions of the PEN-F (20MP) and TG-310 (14MP) and the PEN-F (Four Thirds) and TG-310 (1/2.3") enjoy different sensor measurements.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

The PEN-F was launched 5 years later than the TG-310 and that is quite a large difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus PEN-F being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus TG-310 being a Compact camera.

Before diving straight into a step-by-step comparison, below is a simple summary of how the PEN-F scores versus the TG-310 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus PEN-F over the Olympus TG-310

 PEN-F TG-310 
AnnouncedJanuary 2016January 2011Fresher by 62 months
Manual focus Very accurate focusing
Display typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating display
Display sizing3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")
Display resolution1037k230kCrisper display (+807k dot)
Selfie screen Easy selfies
Touch friendly display Easily navigate

Reasons to pick Olympus TG-310 over the Olympus PEN-F

 TG-310 PEN-F 

Common features in the Olympus PEN-F and Olympus TG-310

 PEN-F TG-310 

Olympus PEN-F vs Olympus TG-310 Physical Comparison

For anybody who is going to carry your camera regularly, you will need to consider its weight and volume. The Olympus PEN-F offers outer dimensions of 125mm x 72mm x 37mm (4.9" x 2.8" x 1.5") along with a weight of 427 grams (0.94 lbs) and the Olympus TG-310 has sizing of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") with a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs).

Take a look at the Olympus PEN-F and Olympus TG-310 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are working with at the time. The following is the front view overall size comparison of the PEN-F versus the TG-310.

Olympus PEN-F vs Olympus TG-310 size comparison

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the PEN-F and TG-310 is 84 and 94 respectively.

Olympus PEN-F vs Olympus TG-310 top view buttons comparison

Olympus PEN-F vs Olympus TG-310 Sensor Comparison

Typically, it is difficult to imagine the difference between sensor sizing only by looking at a spec sheet. The graphic underneath may offer you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the PEN-F and TG-310.

As you can see, both of those cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The PEN-F because of its larger sensor is going to make shooting bokeh less difficult and the Olympus PEN-F will give more detail utilizing its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop pics far more aggressively. The more modern PEN-F provides a benefit with regard to sensor innovation.

Olympus PEN-F vs Olympus TG-310 sensor size comparison

Olympus PEN-F vs Olympus TG-310 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus PEN-F vs Olympus TG-310 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus PEN-F Portrait photography highlights
Olympus TG-310 Portrait photography highlights
75
manual focus
megapixel count good (20MP)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
provides face detect autofocus
saves RAW formats
33
decent sensor resolution (14 megapixels)
offers face detect autofocus
focusing manually not possible
no manual control
can't use external flash
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Street Comparison

Olympus PEN-F Street photography highlights
Olympus TG-310 Street photography highlights
84
screen articulates fully
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
offers focus via touch
very good ISO range (25,600)
66
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment proof
lighter than average in class (155g)
screen is fixed
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
Photography Glossary

Sports Comparison

Olympus PEN-F Sports photography features
Olympus TG-310 Sports photography features
67
maximum shutter speed is high (1/8,000 seconds)
quiet shooting (1/16,000 seconds)
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
megapixel count good (20 megapixels)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
provides tracking focus
bad battery (330 CIPA)
no phase detect autofocus
40
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent sensor resolution (14 megapixels)
offers tracking focus
environment proof
max frames per second very slow (1.0 fps)
no shutter priority mode
small sensor size (1/2.3")
not so great battery pack (150 CIPA)
lacks phase detect autofocus
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Travel Comparison

Olympus PEN-F as a Travel photography camera
Olympus TG-310 as a Travel photography camera
75
offers focus via touch
megapixel count good (20MP)
display is selfie friendly
bad battery (330 per charge)
67
lighter than average in class (155 grams)
environment proof
decent sensor resolution (14MP)
flash built-in
reasonably wide (28mm)
does not have Timelapse mode
not so great battery pack (150 per charge)
does not feature selfie friendly screen
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.9)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Landscape Comparison

Olympus PEN-F Landscape photography details
Olympus TG-310 Landscape photography details
76
manual focus
switch lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen size is good (3")
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
megapixel count good (20MP)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
very good ISO range (25,600)
saves RAW formats
bad battery (330 per charge)
39
reasonably wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent sensor resolution (14MP)
environment proof
focusing manually not possible
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.9)
small screen (2.7 inches)
no manual control
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
not so great battery pack (150 per charge)
does not have Timelapse mode
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Olympus PEN-F
Vlogging with Olympus TG-310
78
display is selfie friendly
touchscreen capability
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
provides face detect autofocus
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 resolution)
missing microphone port
32
reasonably wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
offers face detect autofocus
lighter than average in class (155g)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.9)
does not feature selfie friendly screen
video resolution low (1280 x 720 resolution)
does not have microphone jack
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Olympus PEN-F vs Olympus TG-310 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus PEN-F and Olympus TG-310
 Olympus PEN-FOlympus TG-310
General Information
Company Olympus Olympus
Model Olympus PEN-F Olympus TG-310
Type Advanced Mirrorless Waterproof
Introduced 2016-01-27 2011-01-06
Body design Rangefinder-style mirrorless Compact
Sensor Information
Processor TruePic VII TruePic III+
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 20 megapixels 14 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 -
Peak resolution 5184 x 3888 4288 x 3216
Highest native ISO 25600 1600
Lowest native ISO 200 80
RAW format
Lowest enhanced ISO 80 -
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Autofocus tracking
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Autofocus live view
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Number of focus points 81 -
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mounting type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 28-102mm (3.6x)
Maximal aperture - f/3.9-5.9
Macro focus range - 3cm
Available lenses 107 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fully Articulated Fixed Type
Screen size 3" 2.7"
Resolution of screen 1,037 thousand dot 230 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Screen tech - TFT Color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic None
Viewfinder resolution 2,360 thousand dot -
Viewfinder coverage 100% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.62x -
Features
Min shutter speed 60 seconds 4 seconds
Max shutter speed 1/8000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Max silent shutter speed 1/16000 seconds -
Continuous shutter speed 10.0fps 1.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes -
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range no built-in flash 4.20 m
Flash settings Flash Auto, Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync (1st curtain), Slow sync (1st curtain), Slow sync (2nd curtain) Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in
External flash
AEB
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps)
Highest video resolution 1920x1080 1280x720
Video data format MPEG-4, H.264, Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In Eye-Fi Connected
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 427g (0.94 lb) 155g (0.34 lb)
Dimensions 125 x 72 x 37mm (4.9" x 2.8" x 1.5") 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score 74 not tested
DXO Color Depth score 23.1 not tested
DXO Dynamic range score 12.4 not tested
DXO Low light score 894 not tested
Other
Battery life 330 shots 150 shots
Type of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model BLN-1 LI-42B
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 seconds, custom) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC/SDXC
Storage slots 1 1
Cost at release $1,000 $0