Olympus PEN-F vs Olympus TG-610
84 Imaging
59 Features
79 Overall
67
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/39f4a/39f4a2ac2cd0fd15df5e1339b544117913bf8f2e" alt="Olympus PEN-F front Olympus PEN-F front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/01ae1/01ae1246b008c2c1438d02f27195e5dcd053dfef" alt="Olympus TG-610 front Olympus TG-610 front"
93 Imaging
37 Features
37 Overall
37
Olympus PEN-F vs Olympus TG-610 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 427g - 125 x 72 x 37mm
- Revealed January 2016
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 190g - 96 x 65 x 26mm
- Revealed January 2011
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus PEN-F vs Olympus TG-610 Overview
Lets take a more detailed look at the Olympus PEN-F vs Olympus TG-610, one being a Advanced Mirrorless and the latter is a Waterproof and both of them are offered by Olympus. There exists a crucial gap between the image resolutions of the PEN-F (20MP) and TG-610 (14MP) and the PEN-F (Four Thirds) and TG-610 (1/2.3") have different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
The PEN-F was announced 5 years later than the TG-610 and that is quite a serious gap as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras feature different body design with the Olympus PEN-F being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus TG-610 being a Compact camera.
Before diving straight to a comprehensive comparison, here is a simple introduction of how the PEN-F grades against the TG-610 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus PEN-F vs Olympus TG-610 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus PEN-F and Olympus TG-610. The whole galleries are available at Olympus PEN-F Gallery and Olympus TG-610 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus PEN-F over the Olympus TG-610
PEN-F | TG-610 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | January 2016 | ![]() | January 2011 | Fresher by 62 months |
Focus manually | ![]() | Very exact focus | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
Screen resolution | 1037k | ![]() | 920k | Sharper screen (+117k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-610 over the Olympus PEN-F
TG-610 | PEN-F |
---|
Common features in the Olympus PEN-F and Olympus TG-610
PEN-F | TG-610 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same screen sizing |
Olympus PEN-F vs Olympus TG-610 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to carry your camera often, you are going to need to take into account its weight and proportions. The Olympus PEN-F offers outer dimensions of 125mm x 72mm x 37mm (4.9" x 2.8" x 1.5") with a weight of 427 grams (0.94 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-610 has measurements of 96mm x 65mm x 26mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 1.0") and a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus PEN-F vs Olympus TG-610 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you use at that moment. The following is a front view dimension comparison of the PEN-F compared to the TG-610.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ae361/ae3617cc73d2d61184fe25147f3c90e0de4e427b" alt="Olympus PEN-F vs Olympus TG-610 size comparison Olympus PEN-F vs Olympus TG-610 size comparison"
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the PEN-F and TG-610 is 84 and 93 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5907d/5907dbb7c0dc87de2c24ed6e0c847b5670625017" alt="Olympus PEN-F vs Olympus TG-610 top view buttons comparison Olympus PEN-F vs Olympus TG-610 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus PEN-F vs Olympus TG-610 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is very hard to picture the contrast between sensor sizing just by reading through a spec sheet. The photograph below will help give you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the PEN-F and TG-610.
Clearly, the 2 cameras feature different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The PEN-F using its bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallow DOF less difficult and the Olympus PEN-F will give greater detail with its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also help you crop pictures way more aggressively. The fresher PEN-F should have a benefit with regard to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/34758/3475828d2747e95b0ef304408811972e03d57101" alt="Olympus PEN-F vs Olympus TG-610 sensor size comparison Olympus PEN-F vs Olympus TG-610 sensor size comparison"
Olympus PEN-F vs Olympus TG-610 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ce844/ce84425e65c487aca31d4b3cab3c03f3355ccc30" alt="Olympus PEN-F vs Olympus TG-610 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus PEN-F vs Olympus TG-610 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus PEN-F vs Olympus TG-610 Specifications
Olympus PEN-F | Olympus TG-610 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus PEN-F | Olympus TG-610 |
Class | Advanced Mirrorless | Waterproof |
Revealed | 2016-01-27 | 2011-01-06 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic VII | TruePic III+ |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4288 x 3216 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 1600 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 80 |
RAW format | ||
Minimum enhanced ISO | 80 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 81 | - |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/3.9-5.9 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 3cm |
Total lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 1,037 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Screen technology | - | TFT Hypercrystal III Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 seconds | 4 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/8000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Max silent shutter speed | 1/16000 seconds | - |
Continuous shutter rate | 10.0fps | 1.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 4.20 m |
Flash settings | Flash Auto, Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync (1st curtain), Slow sync (1st curtain), Slow sync (2nd curtain) | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264, Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 427 grams (0.94 lb) | 190 grams (0.42 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 125 x 72 x 37mm (4.9" x 2.8" x 1.5") | 96 x 65 x 26mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 1.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 74 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 23.1 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.4 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 894 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 330 photos | 210 photos |
Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLN-1 | LI-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 seconds, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Price at release | $1,000 | $223 |