Olympus PEN-F vs Panasonic S1
84 Imaging
59 Features
79 Overall
67
54 Imaging
75 Features
84 Overall
78
Olympus PEN-F vs Panasonic S1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 427g - 125 x 72 x 37mm
- Revealed January 2016
(Full Review)
- 24MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3.2" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 51200 (Expand to 204800)
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Leica L Mount
- 1021g - 149 x 110 x 97mm
- Launched February 2019
Olympus PEN-F vs Panasonic S1 Overview
Lets look more closely at the Olympus PEN-F versus Panasonic S1, one being a Advanced Mirrorless and the other is a Pro Mirrorless by brands Olympus and Panasonic. The image resolution of the PEN-F (20MP) and the S1 (24MP) is fairly well matched but the PEN-F (Four Thirds) and S1 (Full frame) posses different sensor size.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe PEN-F was launched 4 years before the S1 and that is quite a serious gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus PEN-F being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic S1 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.
Before diving straight to a in-depth comparison, here is a brief highlight of how the PEN-F grades vs the S1 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus PEN-F vs Panasonic S1 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus PEN-F and Panasonic Lumix DC-S1. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus PEN-F Gallery and Panasonic S1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus PEN-F over the Panasonic S1
PEN-F | S1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fully Articulated | Tilting | Fully Articulating display | |
Selfie screen | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Panasonic S1 over the Olympus PEN-F
S1 | PEN-F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2019 | January 2016 | More recent by 36 months | |
Display dimensions | 3.2" | 3" | Larger display (+0.2") | |
Display resolution | 2100k | 1037k | Clearer display (+1063k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus PEN-F and Panasonic S1
PEN-F | S1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Dial accurate focusing | |||
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Olympus PEN-F vs Panasonic S1 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to lug around your camera often, you're going to have to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Olympus PEN-F comes with exterior measurements of 125mm x 72mm x 37mm (4.9" x 2.8" x 1.5") accompanied by a weight of 427 grams (0.94 lbs) while the Panasonic S1 has dimensions of 149mm x 110mm x 97mm (5.9" x 4.3" x 3.8") accompanied by a weight of 1021 grams (2.25 lbs).
Check the Olympus PEN-F versus Panasonic S1 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are working with during that time. Here is a front view physical size comparison of the PEN-F and the S1.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the PEN-F and S1 is 84 and 54 respectively.
Olympus PEN-F vs Panasonic S1 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is tough to visualize the contrast between sensor measurements merely by checking technical specs. The visual underneath should offer you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the PEN-F and S1.
As you have seen, each of these cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The PEN-F because of its tinier sensor is going to make achieving shallow DOF more difficult and the Panasonic S1 will give greater detail utilizing its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop images more aggressively. The older PEN-F is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus PEN-F vs Panasonic S1 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus PEN-F vs Panasonic S1 Specifications
Olympus PEN-F | Panasonic Lumix DC-S1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus PEN-F | Panasonic Lumix DC-S1 |
Type | Advanced Mirrorless | Pro Mirrorless |
Revealed | 2016-01-27 | 2019-02-01 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic VII | Venus Engine |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | Full frame |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 35.6 x 23.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 847.3mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixels | 24 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 6000 x 4000 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 51200 |
Maximum boosted ISO | - | 204800 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Minimum boosted ISO | 80 | 50 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 81 | 225 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | Leica L |
Total lenses | 107 | 30 |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 1 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Tilting |
Screen size | 3 inch | 3.2 inch |
Resolution of screen | 1,037k dots | 2,100k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dots | 5,760k dots |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | 0.78x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60s | 60s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/8000s |
Highest silent shutter speed | 1/16000s | 1/8000s |
Continuous shooting rate | 10.0fps | 9.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
Flash modes | Flash Auto, Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync (1st curtain), Slow sync (1st curtain), Slow sync (2nd curtain) | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced On/Red-eye Reduction, Slow Sync, Slow Sync w/Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | - | 1/320s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p) | 3840 x 2160 @ 60p / 150 Mbps, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264, H.265 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | Yes (can be charged with high-power laptop/tablet chargers or portable power banks) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 427g (0.94 lb) | 1021g (2.25 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 125 x 72 x 37mm (4.9" x 2.8" x 1.5") | 149 x 110 x 97mm (5.9" x 4.3" x 3.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 74 | 95 |
DXO Color Depth rating | 23.1 | 25.2 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.4 | 14.5 |
DXO Low light rating | 894 | 3333 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 330 pictures | 380 pictures |
Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLN-1 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 seconds, custom) | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | - |
Card slots | 1 | 2 |
Launch cost | $1,000 | $2,498 |