Olympus PEN-F vs Panasonic FX78
84 Imaging
59 Features
79 Overall
67
95 Imaging
35 Features
31 Overall
33
Olympus PEN-F vs Panasonic FX78 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 427g - 125 x 72 x 37mm
- Announced January 2016
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-120mm (F2.5-5.9) lens
- 142g - 100 x 55 x 21mm
- Launched January 2011
- Additionally Known as Lumix DMC-FX77
Olympus PEN-F vs Panasonic FX78 Overview
In this write-up, we will be analyzing the Olympus PEN-F versus Panasonic FX78, former being a Advanced Mirrorless while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Olympus and Panasonic. There is a considerable difference between the sensor resolutions of the PEN-F (20MP) and FX78 (12MP) and the PEN-F (Four Thirds) and FX78 (1/2.3") possess different sensor sizing.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe PEN-F was released 5 years later than the FX78 and that is quite a large difference as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras offer different body type with the Olympus PEN-F being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic FX78 being a Compact camera.
Before we go straight into a full comparison, below is a brief summary of how the PEN-F matches up against the FX78 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus PEN-F vs Panasonic FX78 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus PEN-F & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX78. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus PEN-F Gallery & Panasonic FX78 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus PEN-F over the Panasonic FX78
PEN-F | FX78 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | January 2016 | January 2011 | Fresher by 61 months | |
Focus manually | Very accurate focusing | |||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
Screen resolution | 1037k | 230k | Crisper screen (+807k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FX78 over the Olympus PEN-F
FX78 | PEN-F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen sizing | 3.5" | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
Common features in the Olympus PEN-F and Panasonic FX78
PEN-F | FX78 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Olympus PEN-F vs Panasonic FX78 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to carry your camera regularly, you have to consider its weight and volume. The Olympus PEN-F offers outside dimensions of 125mm x 72mm x 37mm (4.9" x 2.8" x 1.5") accompanied by a weight of 427 grams (0.94 lbs) whilst the Panasonic FX78 has sizing of 100mm x 55mm x 21mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") having a weight of 142 grams (0.31 lbs).
See the Olympus PEN-F versus Panasonic FX78 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are utilising during that time. The following is the front view measurements comparison of the PEN-F and the FX78.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the PEN-F and FX78 is 84 and 95 respectively.
Olympus PEN-F vs Panasonic FX78 Sensor Comparison
Generally, its hard to imagine the gap between sensor sizing purely by looking at specs. The visual underneath should give you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the PEN-F and FX78.
As you can plainly see, both the cameras enjoy different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The PEN-F because of its bigger sensor is going to make getting bokeh easier and the Olympus PEN-F will resolve greater detail as a result of its extra 8MP. Higher resolution will allow you to crop photographs far more aggressively. The fresher PEN-F provides an advantage when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus PEN-F vs Panasonic FX78 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus PEN-F vs Panasonic FX78 Specifications
Olympus PEN-F | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX78 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus PEN-F | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX78 |
Otherwise known as | - | Lumix DMC-FX77 |
Category | Advanced Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
Announced | 2016-01-27 | 2011-01-25 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic VII | Venus Engine FHD |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20MP | 12MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4000 x 3000 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Minimum boosted ISO | 80 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | 81 | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 24-120mm (5.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/2.5-5.9 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 5cm |
Available lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3" | 3.5" |
Screen resolution | 1,037 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen technology | - | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 60 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/8000 secs | 1/1400 secs |
Highest silent shutter speed | 1/16000 secs | - |
Continuous shooting rate | 10.0 frames/s | 4.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 5.60 m |
Flash settings | Flash Auto, Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync (1st curtain), Slow sync (1st curtain), Slow sync (2nd curtain) | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 427 grams (0.94 lb) | 142 grams (0.31 lb) |
Dimensions | 125 x 72 x 37mm (4.9" x 2.8" x 1.5") | 100 x 55 x 21mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 74 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 23.1 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.4 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 894 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 330 shots | 200 shots |
Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLN-1 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 seconds, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Launch pricing | $1,000 | $210 |