Clicky

Olympus PEN-F vs Ricoh WG-M1

Portability
84
Imaging
59
Features
79
Overall
67
Olympus PEN-F front
 
Ricoh WG-M1 front
Portability
91
Imaging
39
Features
22
Overall
32

Olympus PEN-F vs Ricoh WG-M1 Key Specs

Olympus PEN-F
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Screen
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • 1/8000s Max Shutter
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 427g - 125 x 72 x 37mm
  • Revealed January 2016
Ricoh WG-M1
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 1.5" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 800
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
  • 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
  • Revealed September 2014
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus PEN-F vs Ricoh WG-M1 Overview

Below is a in depth comparison of the Olympus PEN-F vs Ricoh WG-M1, former being a Advanced Mirrorless while the other is a Waterproof by rivals Olympus and Ricoh. There is a considerable difference among the image resolutions of the PEN-F (20MP) and WG-M1 (14MP) and the PEN-F (Four Thirds) and WG-M1 (1/2.3") enjoy totally different sensor dimensions.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

The PEN-F was introduced 17 months later than the WG-M1 making the cameras a generation apart from each other. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus PEN-F being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Ricoh WG-M1 being a Compact camera.

Before getting through a full comparison, below is a simple synopsis of how the PEN-F matches up vs the WG-M1 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Photography Glossary
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus PEN-F over the Ricoh WG-M1

 PEN-F WG-M1 
RevealedJanuary 2016September 2014More recent by 17 months
Manual focus More precise focus
Display typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating display
Display sizing3"1.5"Larger display (+1.5")
Display resolution1037k115kCrisper display (+922k dot)
Selfie screen Easy selfies
Touch display Easily navigate

Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-M1 over the Olympus PEN-F

 WG-M1 PEN-F 

Common features in the Olympus PEN-F and Ricoh WG-M1

 PEN-F WG-M1 

Olympus PEN-F vs Ricoh WG-M1 Physical Comparison

If you're aiming to lug around your camera regularly, you will have to consider its weight and proportions. The Olympus PEN-F comes with physical dimensions of 125mm x 72mm x 37mm (4.9" x 2.8" x 1.5") having a weight of 427 grams (0.94 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-M1 has measurements of 66mm x 43mm x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") having a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).

Take a look at the Olympus PEN-F vs Ricoh WG-M1 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you have attached at the time. The following is the front view overall size comparison of the PEN-F vs the WG-M1.

Olympus PEN-F vs Ricoh WG-M1 size comparison

Considering size and weight, the portability score of the PEN-F and WG-M1 is 84 and 91 respectively.

Olympus PEN-F vs Ricoh WG-M1 top view buttons comparison

Olympus PEN-F vs Ricoh WG-M1 Sensor Comparison

Generally, it's tough to visualise the gap in sensor measurements just by researching specifications. The graphic here will give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the PEN-F and WG-M1.

To sum up, the two cameras enjoy different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The PEN-F using its larger sensor will make getting shallow depth of field less difficult and the Olympus PEN-F will provide you with greater detail using its extra 6MP. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop photos far more aggressively. The fresher PEN-F will have an advantage when it comes to sensor innovation.

Olympus PEN-F vs Ricoh WG-M1 sensor size comparison

Olympus PEN-F vs Ricoh WG-M1 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus PEN-F vs Ricoh WG-M1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus PEN-F Portrait photography info
Ricoh WG-M1 Portrait photography info
75
you can focus manually
decent megapixels (20 megapixels)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
has face detection focusing
saves RAW files
30
sensor resolution is decent (14 megapixels)
focusing manually not possible
no manual control
external flash not possible
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Street Comparison

Street photography with Olympus PEN-F
Street photography with Ricoh WG-M1
84
fully articulated screen
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
saves RAW files
has touch focus
very good ISO range (25,600)
53
environment proof
no moving screen
no image stabilization
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
max ISO too low (800)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Sports Comparison

Olympus PEN-F Sports photography features
Ricoh WG-M1 Sports photography features
67
max shutter speed is good (1/8,000 seconds)
silent mode (1/16,000 seconds)
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
decent megapixels (20MP)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
has tracking autofocus
low battery (330 shots)
no phase detect AF
38
sensor resolution is decent (14MP)
environment proof
good battery life (350 per charge)
focal length is fixed ((1×)mm)
no shutter priority mode
no image stabilization
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
has no phase detect autofocus
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Olympus PEN-F
Travel photography with Ricoh WG-M1
75
has touch focus
decent megapixels (20MP)
display is selfie friendly
low battery (330 per charge)
64
good battery life (350 per charge)
environment proof
sensor resolution is decent (14 megapixels)
missing Timelapse recording
screen isn't selfie friendly
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Landscape Comparison

Olympus PEN-F Landscape photography information
Ricoh WG-M1 Landscape photography information
76
you can focus manually
change lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
decent sized screen (3 inches)
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
decent megapixels (20MP)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
very good ISO range (25,600)
saves RAW files
low battery (330 CIPA)
35
sensor resolution is decent (14 megapixels)
environment proof
good battery life (350 shots)
focusing manually not possible
cannot change lenses (fixed lens mount)
focal length is fixed ((1×)mm)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
screen is somewhat small (1.5 inches)
no manual control
no image stabilization
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
max ISO too low (800)
has no RAW files
missing Timelapse recording
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Olympus PEN-F
Vlogging with Ricoh WG-M1
78
display is selfie friendly
touch screen
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
has face detection focusing
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 pixels)
does not have external microphone port
26
high res video (1920 x 1080 pxls)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
screen isn't selfie friendly
no image stabilization
missing external microphone support
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Olympus PEN-F vs Ricoh WG-M1 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus PEN-F and Ricoh WG-M1
 Olympus PEN-FRicoh WG-M1
General Information
Brand Name Olympus Ricoh
Model Olympus PEN-F Ricoh WG-M1
Type Advanced Mirrorless Waterproof
Revealed 2016-01-27 2014-09-12
Physical type Rangefinder-style mirrorless Compact
Sensor Information
Powered by TruePic VII -
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 20 megapixels 14 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3 and 16:9
Peak resolution 5184 x 3888 4320 x 3240
Highest native ISO 25600 800
Minimum native ISO 200 100
RAW format
Minimum enhanced ISO 80 -
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch to focus
Continuous AF
AF single
AF tracking
Selective AF
AF center weighted
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Number of focus points 81 -
Lens
Lens mount Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - (1×)
Highest aperture - f/2.8
Number of lenses 107 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fully Articulated Fixed Type
Screen sizing 3 inch 1.5 inch
Screen resolution 1,037k dots 115k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic None
Viewfinder resolution 2,360k dots -
Viewfinder coverage 100 percent -
Viewfinder magnification 0.62x -
Features
Minimum shutter speed 60 secs -
Fastest shutter speed 1/8000 secs -
Fastest silent shutter speed 1/16000 secs -
Continuous shutter rate 10.0 frames per sec 10.0 frames per sec
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes -
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range no built-in flash no built-in flash
Flash options Flash Auto, Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync (1st curtain), Slow sync (1st curtain), Slow sync (2nd curtain) no built-in flash
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p) 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p)
Highest video resolution 1920x1080 1920x1080
Video format MPEG-4, H.264, Motion JPEG H.264
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 427 grams (0.94 pounds) 190 grams (0.42 pounds)
Dimensions 125 x 72 x 37mm (4.9" x 2.8" x 1.5") 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score 74 not tested
DXO Color Depth score 23.1 not tested
DXO Dynamic range score 12.4 not tested
DXO Low light score 894 not tested
Other
Battery life 330 shots 350 shots
Type of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model BLN-1 DB-65
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 seconds, custom) -
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC microSD/microSDHC, internal
Card slots Single Single
Launch pricing $1,000 $2,000