Olympus PEN-F vs Ricoh WG-M1
84 Imaging
59 Features
79 Overall
67
91 Imaging
39 Features
22 Overall
32
Olympus PEN-F vs Ricoh WG-M1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 427g - 125 x 72 x 37mm
- Revealed January 2016
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 1.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
- 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
- Revealed September 2014
Olympus PEN-F vs Ricoh WG-M1 Overview
Below is a in depth comparison of the Olympus PEN-F vs Ricoh WG-M1, former being a Advanced Mirrorless while the other is a Waterproof by rivals Olympus and Ricoh. There is a considerable difference among the image resolutions of the PEN-F (20MP) and WG-M1 (14MP) and the PEN-F (Four Thirds) and WG-M1 (1/2.3") enjoy totally different sensor dimensions.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe PEN-F was introduced 17 months later than the WG-M1 making the cameras a generation apart from each other. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus PEN-F being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Ricoh WG-M1 being a Compact camera.
Before getting through a full comparison, below is a simple synopsis of how the PEN-F matches up vs the WG-M1 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus PEN-F vs Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus PEN-F & Ricoh WG-M1. The whole galleries are available at Olympus PEN-F Gallery & Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus PEN-F over the Ricoh WG-M1
PEN-F | WG-M1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | January 2016 | September 2014 | More recent by 17 months | |
Manual focus | More precise focus | |||
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating display | |
Display sizing | 3" | 1.5" | Larger display (+1.5") | |
Display resolution | 1037k | 115k | Crisper display (+922k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies | |||
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-M1 over the Olympus PEN-F
WG-M1 | PEN-F |
---|
Common features in the Olympus PEN-F and Ricoh WG-M1
PEN-F | WG-M1 |
---|
Olympus PEN-F vs Ricoh WG-M1 Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to lug around your camera regularly, you will have to consider its weight and proportions. The Olympus PEN-F comes with physical dimensions of 125mm x 72mm x 37mm (4.9" x 2.8" x 1.5") having a weight of 427 grams (0.94 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-M1 has measurements of 66mm x 43mm x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") having a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus PEN-F vs Ricoh WG-M1 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you have attached at the time. The following is the front view overall size comparison of the PEN-F vs the WG-M1.
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the PEN-F and WG-M1 is 84 and 91 respectively.
Olympus PEN-F vs Ricoh WG-M1 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it's tough to visualise the gap in sensor measurements just by researching specifications. The graphic here will give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the PEN-F and WG-M1.
To sum up, the two cameras enjoy different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The PEN-F using its larger sensor will make getting shallow depth of field less difficult and the Olympus PEN-F will provide you with greater detail using its extra 6MP. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop photos far more aggressively. The fresher PEN-F will have an advantage when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus PEN-F vs Ricoh WG-M1 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus PEN-F vs Ricoh WG-M1 Specifications
Olympus PEN-F | Ricoh WG-M1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Ricoh |
Model | Olympus PEN-F | Ricoh WG-M1 |
Type | Advanced Mirrorless | Waterproof |
Revealed | 2016-01-27 | 2014-09-12 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic VII | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4320 x 3240 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 800 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Minimum enhanced ISO | 80 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | 81 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | (1×) |
Highest aperture | - | f/2.8 |
Number of lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inch | 1.5 inch |
Screen resolution | 1,037k dots | 115k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 secs | - |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/8000 secs | - |
Fastest silent shutter speed | 1/16000 secs | - |
Continuous shutter rate | 10.0 frames per sec | 10.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
Flash options | Flash Auto, Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync (1st curtain), Slow sync (1st curtain), Slow sync (2nd curtain) | no built-in flash |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264, Motion JPEG | H.264 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 427 grams (0.94 pounds) | 190 grams (0.42 pounds) |
Dimensions | 125 x 72 x 37mm (4.9" x 2.8" x 1.5") | 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 74 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 23.1 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.4 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 894 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 330 shots | 350 shots |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLN-1 | DB-65 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 seconds, custom) | - |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | microSD/microSDHC, internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Launch pricing | $1,000 | $2,000 |