Olympus SH-50 vs Panasonic FZ300
88 Imaging
39 Features
48 Overall
42
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/88d49/88d491f346db87b2f72053243d7a55b3e85bdf50" alt="Olympus SH-50 front Olympus SH-50 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/eb0e7/eb0e7d68430f7af24efc1c439232dbd28d053d73" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ300 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ300 front"
59 Imaging
37 Features
73 Overall
51
Olympus SH-50 vs Panasonic FZ300 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 269g - 112 x 63 x 42mm
- Announced January 2013
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1/16000s Maximum Shutter
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 25-600mm (F2.8) lens
- 691g - 132 x 92 x 117mm
- Announced July 2015
- Earlier Model is Panasonic FZ200
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus SH-50 vs Panasonic FZ300 Overview
Its time to look much closer at the Olympus SH-50 versus Panasonic FZ300, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by companies Olympus and Panasonic. There is a noticeable difference between the sensor resolutions of the SH-50 (16MP) and FZ300 (12MP) but both cameras boast the same sensor size (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
The SH-50 was launched 3 years earlier than the FZ300 and that is quite a sizable difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus SH-50 being a Compact camera and the Panasonic FZ300 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before diving straight to a in depth comparison, here is a concise view of how the SH-50 grades versus the FZ300 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus SH-50 vs Panasonic FZ300 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus SH-50 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ300. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus SH-50 Gallery & Panasonic FZ300 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SH-50 over the Panasonic FZ300
SH-50 | FZ300 |
---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic FZ300 over the Olympus SH-50
FZ300 | SH-50 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | July 2015 | ![]() | January 2013 | More recent by 30 months |
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
Screen resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 460k | Sharper screen (+580k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies |
Common features in the Olympus SH-50 and Panasonic FZ300
SH-50 | FZ300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial accurate focusing | ||
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal screen size |
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Olympus SH-50 vs Panasonic FZ300 Physical Comparison
If you are intending to lug around your camera, you will want to factor in its weight and size. The Olympus SH-50 features physical measurements of 112mm x 63mm x 42mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.7") along with a weight of 269 grams (0.59 lbs) while the Panasonic FZ300 has specifications of 132mm x 92mm x 117mm (5.2" x 3.6" x 4.6") and a weight of 691 grams (1.52 lbs).
See the Olympus SH-50 versus Panasonic FZ300 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you select at that time. The following is a front view overall size comparison of the SH-50 compared to the FZ300.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4915b/4915b81a3db79c6fff130d142d105a395ea7b38c" alt="Olympus SH-50 vs Panasonic FZ300 size comparison Olympus SH-50 vs Panasonic FZ300 size comparison"
Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the SH-50 and FZ300 is 88 and 59 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/677f9/677f9036f2e5927bb316efda3865f92d260e988b" alt="Olympus SH-50 vs Panasonic FZ300 top view buttons comparison Olympus SH-50 vs Panasonic FZ300 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus SH-50 vs Panasonic FZ300 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is difficult to visualise the contrast between sensor measurements only by reviewing specifications. The photograph here will give you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the SH-50 and FZ300.
Plainly, both of those cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same megapixels. You can count on the Olympus SH-50 to deliver extra detail utilizing its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will enable you to crop pictures more aggressively. The older SH-50 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f4c48/f4c484f07c4a1a404c53428fbbed4ac157718909" alt="Olympus SH-50 vs Panasonic FZ300 sensor size comparison Olympus SH-50 vs Panasonic FZ300 sensor size comparison"
Olympus SH-50 vs Panasonic FZ300 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c75aa/c75aaa021cb29e24d9858edc5d677c0f3a611d2a" alt="Olympus SH-50 vs Panasonic FZ300 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus SH-50 vs Panasonic FZ300 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus SH-50 vs Panasonic FZ300 Specifications
Olympus SH-50 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ300 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus SH-50 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ300 |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2013-01-08 | 2015-07-16 |
Body design | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic VI | Venus Engine |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 125 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | - | 49 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 25-600mm (24.0x) | 25-600mm (24.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.0-6.9 | f/2.8 |
Macro focus distance | 5cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 460 thousand dot | 1,040 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 1,440 thousand dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 15 seconds | 60 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/16000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 12.0 frames per sec | 12.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 4.00 m | 8.80 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync | Auto, auto w/redeye reduction, forced on, forced on w/redeye reduction, slow sync, slow sync w/redeye reduction, forced off |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 480fps (176 x 128), 240fps (384 x 288) | 3840 x 2160 (30p, 24p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 30p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 269 gr (0.59 lb) | 691 gr (1.52 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 112 x 63 x 42mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.7") | 132 x 92 x 117mm (5.2" x 3.6" x 4.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 380 pictures |
Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | SLB-10A | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, Pet Auto Shutter) | Yes |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch cost | $300 | $598 |