Olympus SH-50 vs Ricoh CX4
88 Imaging
39 Features
48 Overall
42
92 Imaging
33 Features
34 Overall
33
Olympus SH-50 vs Ricoh CX4 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 269g - 112 x 63 x 42mm
- Launched January 2013
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 205g - 102 x 59 x 29mm
- Introduced August 2010
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus SH-50 vs Ricoh CX4 Overview
Below, we will be looking at the Olympus SH-50 versus Ricoh CX4, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by rivals Olympus and Ricoh. There exists a sizeable gap between the resolutions of the SH-50 (16MP) and CX4 (10MP) but they enjoy the exact same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe SH-50 was announced 2 years later than the CX4 and that is quite a large gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before going straight into a comprehensive comparison, below is a brief view of how the SH-50 scores vs the CX4 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus SH-50 vs Ricoh CX4 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus SH-50 and Ricoh CX4. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus SH-50 Gallery and Ricoh CX4 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SH-50 over the Ricoh CX4
| SH-50 | CX4 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2013 |  | August 2010 | Fresher by 30 months |
| Touch friendly screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX4 over the Olympus SH-50
| CX4 | SH-50 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen resolution | 920k |  | 460k | Clearer screen (+460k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus SH-50 and Ricoh CX4
| SH-50 | CX4 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Dial precise focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical screen measurements |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither includes selfie screen |
Olympus SH-50 vs Ricoh CX4 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to carry your camera often, you will want to think about its weight and measurements. The Olympus SH-50 features exterior dimensions of 112mm x 63mm x 42mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.7") along with a weight of 269 grams (0.59 lbs) and the Ricoh CX4 has proportions of 102mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus SH-50 versus Ricoh CX4 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are utilising at that moment. Below is the front view measurements comparison of the SH-50 against the CX4.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the SH-50 and CX4 is 88 and 92 respectively.
Olympus SH-50 vs Ricoh CX4 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is very hard to envision the difference between sensor sizing purely by reviewing a spec sheet. The photograph below will provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the SH-50 and CX4.
As you can see, both cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same resolution. You should count on the Olympus SH-50 to offer greater detail with its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also let you crop photographs much more aggressively. The fresher SH-50 will have an advantage in sensor tech.
Olympus SH-50 vs Ricoh CX4 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Olympus SH-50 vs Ricoh CX4 Specifications
| Olympus SH-50 | Ricoh CX4 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model type | Olympus SH-50 | Ricoh CX4 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2013-01-08 | 2010-08-19 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TruePic VI | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 10MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 125 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-600mm (24.0x) | 28-300mm (10.7x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.0-6.9 | f/3.5-5.6 |
| Macro focusing range | 5cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3" | 3" |
| Display resolution | 460 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 15 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | 12.0 frames per sec | 5.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.00 m | 4.00 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 480fps (176 x 128), 240fps (384 x 288) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 269g (0.59 lbs) | 205g (0.45 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 112 x 63 x 42mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.7") | 102 x 59 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | SLB-10A | DB-100 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, Pet Auto Shutter) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Price at launch | $300 | $211 |