Olympus SP-565UZ vs Olympus TG-810
72 Imaging
33 Features
32 Overall
32
92 Imaging
37 Features
37 Overall
37
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Olympus TG-810 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-520mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
- 413g - 116 x 84 x 81mm
- Released January 2009
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 215g - 100 x 65 x 26mm
- Launched August 2011
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus SP-565UZ vs Olympus TG-810 Overview
In this write-up, we will be evaluating the Olympus SP-565UZ and Olympus TG-810, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Waterproof and both are designed by Olympus. There is a huge difference between the image resolutions of the SP-565UZ (10MP) and TG-810 (14MP) but they enjoy the same exact sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe SP-565UZ was announced 3 years earlier than the TG-810 and that is quite a significant gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving straight into a thorough comparison, below is a short synopsis of how the SP-565UZ grades versus the TG-810 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus SP-565UZ vs Olympus TG-810 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus SP-565UZ and Olympus TG-810. The whole galleries are available at Olympus SP-565UZ Gallery and Olympus TG-810 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-565UZ over the Olympus TG-810
| SP-565UZ | TG-810 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Dial precise focus |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-810 over the Olympus SP-565UZ
| TG-810 | SP-565UZ | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | August 2011 |  | January 2009 | More recent by 31 months |
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
| Screen resolution | 920k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus SP-565UZ and Olympus TG-810
| SP-565UZ | TG-810 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | No Touch screen |
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Olympus TG-810 Physical Comparison
If you're going to lug around your camera regularly, you will have to factor its weight and measurements. The Olympus SP-565UZ offers outer dimensions of 116mm x 84mm x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") accompanied by a weight of 413 grams (0.91 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-810 has proportions of 100mm x 65mm x 26mm (3.9" x 2.6" x 1.0") and a weight of 215 grams (0.47 lbs).
Compare the Olympus SP-565UZ and Olympus TG-810 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you have attached at that moment. Here is the front view overall size comparison of the SP-565UZ against the TG-810.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the SP-565UZ and TG-810 is 72 and 92 respectively.
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Olympus TG-810 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, its difficult to see the contrast between sensor measurements only by checking specifications. The graphic underneath will help provide you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the SP-565UZ and TG-810.
To sum up, each of the cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same MP. You should count on the Olympus TG-810 to give extra detail with its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop pictures far more aggressively. The older SP-565UZ is going to be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Olympus TG-810 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Olympus TG-810 Specifications
| Olympus SP-565UZ | Olympus TG-810 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model | Olympus SP-565UZ | Olympus TG-810 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Released | 2009-01-15 | 2011-08-16 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | - | TruePic III+ |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10MP | 14MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Number of focus points | 143 | - |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 26-520mm (20.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/2.8-4.5 | f/3.9-5.9 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | 3cm |
| Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 2.5" | 3" |
| Display resolution | 230 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Display technology | - | TFT Hypercrystal III Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 1 secs | 4 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 1.0fps | 1.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 6.40 m (ISO 200) | 4.20 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 @ 30 fps/15 fps, 320 x 240 @ 30 fps/15 fps | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 413 grams (0.91 pounds) | 215 grams (0.47 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 116 x 84 x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") | 100 x 65 x 26mm (3.9" x 2.6" x 1.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | 30 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | 18.7 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 10.1 | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | 68 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 220 photos |
| Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | 4 x AA | LI-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (12 or 2 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | xD Picture Card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Pricing at release | $400 | $428 |
