Olympus SP-565UZ vs Olympus TG-1 iHS
72 Imaging
32 Features
32 Overall
32
91 Imaging
35 Features
40 Overall
37
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-520mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
- 413g - 116 x 84 x 81mm
- Revealed January 2009
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 112 x 67 x 30mm
- Launched May 2012
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus SP-565UZ vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Overview
On this page, we are contrasting the Olympus SP-565UZ versus Olympus TG-1 iHS, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Waterproof and they are both built by Olympus. The image resolution of the SP-565UZ (10MP) and the TG-1 iHS (12MP) is very comparable and both cameras posses the same sensor size (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe SP-565UZ was unveiled 4 years prior to the TG-1 iHS and that is a fairly serious difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before delving right into a complete comparison, here is a brief view of how the SP-565UZ grades versus the TG-1 iHS in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Olympus SP-565UZ vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus SP-565UZ & Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS. The full galleries are provided at Olympus SP-565UZ Gallery & Olympus TG-1 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-565UZ over the Olympus TG-1 iHS
| SP-565UZ | TG-1 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | More accurate focus |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-1 iHS over the Olympus SP-565UZ
| TG-1 iHS | SP-565UZ | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | May 2012 |  | January 2009 | Fresher by 40 months |
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
| Display resolution | 610k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+380k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus SP-565UZ and Olympus TG-1 iHS
| SP-565UZ | TG-1 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither provides Touch friendly display |
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Physical Comparison
When you are planning to carry your camera often, you should consider its weight and size. The Olympus SP-565UZ provides physical measurements of 116mm x 84mm x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") accompanied by a weight of 413 grams (0.91 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-1 iHS has specifications of 112mm x 67mm x 30mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") along with a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus SP-565UZ versus Olympus TG-1 iHS in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are employing at that time. Underneath is a front view measurement comparison of the SP-565UZ compared to the TG-1 iHS.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the SP-565UZ and TG-1 iHS is 72 and 91 respectively.
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is tough to picture the difference in sensor sizing simply by seeing specs. The photograph here should provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the SP-565UZ and TG-1 iHS.
All in all, both cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but different megapixels. You can expect to see the Olympus TG-1 iHS to produce more detail having an extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also help you crop pics more aggressively. The older SP-565UZ will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Specifications
| Olympus SP-565UZ | Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model type | Olympus SP-565UZ | Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Revealed | 2009-01-15 | 2012-05-08 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | - | TruePic VI |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10MP | 12MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Total focus points | 143 | - |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 26-520mm (20.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.8-4.5 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 2.5 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 230k dot | 610k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 1 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 1.0 frames/s | 3.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 6.40 m (ISO 200) | - |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 @ 30 fps/15 fps, 320 x 240 @ 30 fps/15 fps | 1920 x 1080 |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | - | H.264 |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 413 grams (0.91 pounds) | 230 grams (0.51 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 116 x 84 x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") | 112 x 67 x 30mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | 30 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 18.7 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.1 | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | 68 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 350 pictures |
| Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | 4 x AA | LI90B |
| Self timer | Yes (12 or 2 sec) | Yes (2 and 12 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | xD Picture Card, Internal | - |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at release | $400 | $399 |