Olympus SP-565UZ vs Olympus TG-1 iHS
72 Imaging
32 Features
32 Overall
32
91 Imaging
35 Features
40 Overall
37
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-520mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
- 413g - 116 x 84 x 81mm
- Revealed January 2009
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 112 x 67 x 30mm
- Launched May 2012
Photography Glossary Olympus SP-565UZ vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Overview
On this page, we are contrasting the Olympus SP-565UZ versus Olympus TG-1 iHS, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Waterproof and they are both built by Olympus. The image resolution of the SP-565UZ (10MP) and the TG-1 iHS (12MP) is very comparable and both cameras posses the same sensor size (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe SP-565UZ was unveiled 4 years prior to the TG-1 iHS and that is a fairly serious difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before delving right into a complete comparison, here is a brief view of how the SP-565UZ grades versus the TG-1 iHS in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus SP-565UZ vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus SP-565UZ & Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS. The full galleries are provided at Olympus SP-565UZ Gallery & Olympus TG-1 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-565UZ over the Olympus TG-1 iHS
| SP-565UZ | TG-1 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | More accurate focus |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-1 iHS over the Olympus SP-565UZ
| TG-1 iHS | SP-565UZ | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | May 2012 |  | January 2009 | Fresher by 40 months |
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
| Display resolution | 610k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+380k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus SP-565UZ and Olympus TG-1 iHS
| SP-565UZ | TG-1 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither provides Touch friendly display |
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Physical Comparison
When you are planning to carry your camera often, you should consider its weight and size. The Olympus SP-565UZ provides physical measurements of 116mm x 84mm x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") accompanied by a weight of 413 grams (0.91 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-1 iHS has specifications of 112mm x 67mm x 30mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") along with a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus SP-565UZ versus Olympus TG-1 iHS in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are employing at that time. Underneath is a front view measurement comparison of the SP-565UZ compared to the TG-1 iHS.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the SP-565UZ and TG-1 iHS is 72 and 91 respectively.
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is tough to picture the difference in sensor sizing simply by seeing specs. The photograph here should provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the SP-565UZ and TG-1 iHS.
All in all, both cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but different megapixels. You can expect to see the Olympus TG-1 iHS to produce more detail having an extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also help you crop pics more aggressively. The older SP-565UZ will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Specifications
| Olympus SP-565UZ | Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model type | Olympus SP-565UZ | Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Revealed | 2009-01-15 | 2012-05-08 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | - | TruePic VI |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10MP | 12MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Total focus points | 143 | - |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 26-520mm (20.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.8-4.5 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 2.5 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 230k dot | 610k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 1 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 1.0 frames/s | 3.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 6.40 m (ISO 200) | - |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 @ 30 fps/15 fps, 320 x 240 @ 30 fps/15 fps | 1920 x 1080 |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | - | H.264 |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 413 grams (0.91 pounds) | 230 grams (0.51 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 116 x 84 x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") | 112 x 67 x 30mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | 30 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 18.7 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.1 | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | 68 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 350 pictures |
| Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | 4 x AA | LI90B |
| Self timer | Yes (12 or 2 sec) | Yes (2 and 12 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | xD Picture Card, Internal | - |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at release | $400 | $399 |