Olympus SP-565UZ vs Panasonic ZS30
72 Imaging
33 Features
32 Overall
32
92 Imaging
42 Features
48 Overall
44
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Panasonic ZS30 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-520mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
- 413g - 116 x 84 x 81mm
- Introduced January 2009
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-480mm (F3.3-6.4) lens
- 198g - 105 x 59 x 28mm
- Introduced January 2013
- Additionally referred to as Lumix DMC-TZ40
- Superseded the Panasonic ZS25
- Later Model is Panasonic ZS35
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus SP-565UZ vs Panasonic ZS30 Overview
Lets take a closer look at the Olympus SP-565UZ vs Panasonic ZS30, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by manufacturers Olympus and Panasonic. There is a considerable difference among the resolutions of the SP-565UZ (10MP) and ZS30 (18MP) but they feature the same exact sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe SP-565UZ was unveiled 5 years earlier than the ZS30 which is a fairly large difference as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving through a comprehensive comparison, below is a simple highlight of how the SP-565UZ matches up versus the ZS30 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus SP-565UZ vs Panasonic ZS30 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus SP-565UZ & Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS30. The full galleries are available at Olympus SP-565UZ Gallery & Panasonic ZS30 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-565UZ over the Panasonic ZS30
| SP-565UZ | ZS30 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | More accurate focus |
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS30 over the Olympus SP-565UZ
| ZS30 | SP-565UZ | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2013 |  | January 2009 | More modern by 48 months |
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
| Screen resolution | 920k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+690k dot) |
| Touch friendly screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus SP-565UZ and Panasonic ZS30
| SP-565UZ | ZS30 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen |
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Panasonic ZS30 Physical Comparison
If you are going to carry around your camera regularly, you need to factor its weight and dimensions. The Olympus SP-565UZ enjoys external measurements of 116mm x 84mm x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") with a weight of 413 grams (0.91 lbs) while the Panasonic ZS30 has dimensions of 105mm x 59mm x 28mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 198 grams (0.44 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus SP-565UZ vs Panasonic ZS30 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are utilizing at the time. Below is the front view measurement comparison of the SP-565UZ and the ZS30.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the SP-565UZ and ZS30 is 72 and 92 respectively.
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Panasonic ZS30 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is hard to visualize the gap in sensor sizes simply by going through specs. The image below will help give you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the SP-565UZ and ZS30.
As you can plainly see, both of these cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit different megapixels. You can count on the Panasonic ZS30 to provide more detail having an extra 8MP. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop pictures far more aggressively. The more aged SP-565UZ will be behind when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Panasonic ZS30 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Panasonic ZS30 Specifications
| Olympus SP-565UZ | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS30 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Panasonic |
| Model type | Olympus SP-565UZ | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS30 |
| Alternative name | - | Lumix DMC-TZ40 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2009-01-15 | 2013-01-07 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 18 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4896 x 3672 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Total focus points | 143 | 23 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 26-520mm (20.0x) | 24-480mm (20.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.8-4.5 | f/3.3-6.4 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 3cm |
| Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 2.5 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 230k dots | 920k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 1s | 15s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1200s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 1.0fps | 10.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 6.40 m (ISO 200) | 6.40 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 @ 30 fps/15 fps, 320 x 240 @ 30 fps/15 fps | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (220 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | - | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 413 grams (0.91 lb) | 198 grams (0.44 lb) |
| Dimensions | 116 x 84 x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") | 105 x 59 x 28mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | 30 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 18.7 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.1 | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | 68 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 260 images |
| Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | 4 x AA | - |
| Self timer | Yes (12 or 2 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | xD Picture Card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at release | $400 | $250 |