Clicky

Olympus SP-565UZ vs Sony A6300

Portability
72
Imaging
33
Features
32
Overall
32
Olympus SP-565UZ front
 
Sony Alpha a6300 front
Portability
83
Imaging
67
Features
82
Overall
73

Olympus SP-565UZ vs Sony A6300 Key Specs

Olympus SP-565UZ
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Display
  • ISO 64 - 6400
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 26-520mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
  • 413g - 116 x 84 x 81mm
  • Revealed January 2009
Sony A6300
(Full Review)
  • 24MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Display
  • ISO 100 - 25600 (Bump to 51200)
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • Sony E Mount
  • 404g - 120 x 67 x 49mm
  • Revealed February 2016
  • Superseded the Sony A6000
  • Updated by Sony A6500
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Olympus SP-565UZ vs Sony A6300 Overview

The following is a detailed comparison of the Olympus SP-565UZ versus Sony A6300, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by brands Olympus and Sony. There is a sizable difference among the image resolutions of the SP-565UZ (10MP) and A6300 (24MP) and the SP-565UZ (1/2.3") and A6300 (APS-C) enjoy different sensor sizing.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

The SP-565UZ was released 8 years earlier than the A6300 which is a fairly significant difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus SP-565UZ being a Compact camera and the Sony A6300 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.

Before delving through a step-by-step comparison, below is a brief overview of how the SP-565UZ grades versus the A6300 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus SP-565UZ over the Sony A6300

 SP-565UZ A6300 

Reasons to pick Sony A6300 over the Olympus SP-565UZ

 A6300 SP-565UZ 
RevealedFebruary 2016January 2009Newer by 85 months
Display typeTiltingFixed Tilting display
Display dimension3"2.5"Larger display (+0.5")
Display resolution922k230kSharper display (+692k dot)

Common features in the Olympus SP-565UZ and Sony A6300

 SP-565UZ A6300 
Manual focus Very exact focusing
Selfie screen Neither includes selfie screen
Touch friendly display Lacking Touch friendly display

Olympus SP-565UZ vs Sony A6300 Physical Comparison

For anyone who is going to travel with your camera, you are going to need to factor in its weight and volume. The Olympus SP-565UZ features outer measurements of 116mm x 84mm x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") and a weight of 413 grams (0.91 lbs) and the Sony A6300 has sizing of 120mm x 67mm x 49mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 1.9") having a weight of 404 grams (0.89 lbs).

See the Olympus SP-565UZ versus Sony A6300 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are utilising at that moment. The following is the front view overall size comparison of the SP-565UZ and the A6300.

Olympus SP-565UZ vs Sony A6300 size comparison

Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the SP-565UZ and A6300 is 72 and 83 respectively.

Olympus SP-565UZ vs Sony A6300 top view buttons comparison

Olympus SP-565UZ vs Sony A6300 Sensor Comparison

Usually, it can be difficult to picture the difference in sensor dimensions merely by going through specs. The image underneath might offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the SP-565UZ and A6300.

As you can plainly see, each of the cameras have got different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The SP-565UZ featuring a smaller sensor is going to make achieving shallower depth of field more difficult and the Sony A6300 will provide more detail as a result of its extra 14MP. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop images much more aggressively. The more aged SP-565UZ will be disadvantaged in sensor tech.

Olympus SP-565UZ vs Sony A6300 sensor size comparison

Olympus SP-565UZ vs Sony A6300 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus SP-565UZ vs Sony A6300 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus SP-565UZ Portrait photography factors
Sony A6300 Portrait photography factors
39
manual focus
delivers RAW formats
megapixel count low (10MP)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
80
has manual focus
good MP (24 megapixels)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
includes face detect autofocus
saves RAW files
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Street Comparison

Olympus SP-565UZ Street photography info
Sony A6300 Street photography info
56
image stabilization (Optical)
delivers RAW formats
screen does not articulate
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
79
tilting screen
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
saves RAW files
weather sealing
good ISO range (25,600)
lack of image stabilization
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Olympus SP-565UZ
Sports photography with Sony A6300
33
excellent zoom range (26-520mm 20.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Optical)
max frames per second low (1.0 frames/s)
megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect auto focus
75
good MP (24 megapixels)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
includes tracking focus
weather sealing
sensor has phase detect autofocus
lack of image stabilization
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Travel Comparison

Olympus SP-565UZ as a Travel photography camera
Sony A6300 as a Travel photography camera
52
has built in flash
reasonably wide (26mm)
long reach (520mm)
no Timelapse recording
megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
does not contain selfie friendly screen
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
76
weather sealing
good MP (24MP)
has built in flash
display isn't selfie friendly
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Olympus SP-565UZ
Landscape photography with Sony A6300
40
manual focus
reasonably wide (26mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
delivers RAW formats
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
screen is somewhat small (2.5 inches)
megapixel count low (10MP)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
no Timelapse recording
79
has manual focus
interchangeable lenses (Sony E mount)
screen size is good (3")
good MP (24 megapixels)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
good ISO range (25,600)
saves RAW files
weather sealing
lack of image stabilization
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus SP-565UZ Vlogging features
Sony A6300 Vlogging features
24
reasonably wide (26mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
does not contain selfie friendly screen
low quality video (640 x 480 pxls)
no external microphone jack
35
includes face detect autofocus
high res video (3840 x 2160 pixels)
includes mic jack
display isn't selfie friendly
lack of image stabilization
Photography Glossary

Olympus SP-565UZ vs Sony A6300 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus SP-565UZ and Sony A6300
 Olympus SP-565UZSony Alpha a6300
General Information
Manufacturer Olympus Sony
Model Olympus SP-565UZ Sony Alpha a6300
Category Small Sensor Superzoom Advanced Mirrorless
Revealed 2009-01-15 2016-02-03
Body design Compact Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Processor - BIONZ X
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor dimensions 6.08 x 4.56mm 23.5 x 15.6mm
Sensor area 27.7mm² 366.6mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixel 24 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 and 16:9 3:2 and 16:9
Full resolution 3648 x 2736 6000 x 4000
Max native ISO 6400 25600
Max boosted ISO - 51200
Minimum native ISO 64 100
RAW data
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch focus
AF continuous
Single AF
Tracking AF
Selective AF
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Number of focus points 143 425
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens Sony E
Lens focal range 26-520mm (20.0x) -
Largest aperture f/2.8-4.5 -
Macro focus range 1cm -
Available lenses - 121
Crop factor 5.9 1.5
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Tilting
Display sizing 2.5" 3"
Resolution of display 230 thousand dot 922 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic Electronic
Viewfinder resolution - 2,359 thousand dot
Viewfinder coverage - 100%
Viewfinder magnification - 0.7x
Features
Slowest shutter speed 1s 30s
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000s 1/4000s
Continuous shooting speed 1.0 frames/s 11.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 6.40 m (ISO 200) 6.00 m (at ISO 100)
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync Flash off, Autoflash, Fill-flash, Rear Sync., Slow Sync., Red-eye reduction, Hi-speed sync, Wireless
External flash
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 640 x 480 @ 30 fps/15 fps, 320 x 240 @ 30 fps/15 fps 4K (3840 x 2160 @ 30p/24p), 1920 x 1080 (120p, 60p, 60i, 30p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (24p)
Max video resolution 640x480 3840x2160
Video file format - MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S, H.264
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 413 gr (0.91 lb) 404 gr (0.89 lb)
Dimensions 116 x 84 x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") 120 x 67 x 49mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 1.9")
DXO scores
DXO All around score 30 85
DXO Color Depth score 18.7 24.4
DXO Dynamic range score 10.1 13.7
DXO Low light score 68 1437
Other
Battery life - 400 photos
Battery format - Battery Pack
Battery model 4 x AA NP-FW50
Self timer Yes (12 or 2 sec) Yes
Time lapse feature With downloadable app
Storage media xD Picture Card, Internal SD/SDHC/SDXC
Storage slots One One
Retail price $400 $889