Olympus SP-590 UZ vs Olympus TG-860
72 Imaging
34 Features
38 Overall
35
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/49476/49476823376bf1f79d845d8994f5bd8b0081bd2b" alt="Olympus SP-590 UZ front Olympus SP-590 UZ front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/042ab/042ab9bda5359b24c15525e105c8dbb85792e213" alt="Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860 front Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860 front"
91 Imaging
40 Features
42 Overall
40
Olympus SP-590 UZ vs Olympus TG-860 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-676mm (F2.8-5.0) lens
- 413g - 116 x 84 x 81mm
- Revealed January 2009
- Renewed by Olympus SP-600 UZ
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21-105mm (F3.5-5.7) lens
- 224g - 110 x 64 x 28mm
- Announced February 2015
- New Model is Olympus TG-870
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus SP-590 UZ vs Olympus TG-860 Overview
The following is a in-depth assessment of the Olympus SP-590 UZ vs Olympus TG-860, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Waterproof and they are both created by Olympus. There is a noticeable difference among the image resolutions of the SP-590 UZ (12MP) and TG-860 (16MP) but they enjoy the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
The SP-590 UZ was released 7 years prior to the TG-860 which is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras offer different body type with the Olympus SP-590 UZ being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Olympus TG-860 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before delving in to a in-depth comparison, below is a concise summary of how the SP-590 UZ matches up versus the TG-860 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus SP-590 UZ vs Olympus TG-860 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus SP-590 UZ & Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus SP-590 UZ Gallery & Olympus TG-860 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-590 UZ over the Olympus TG-860
SP-590 UZ | TG-860 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial precise focusing |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-860 over the Olympus SP-590 UZ
TG-860 | SP-590 UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | February 2015 | ![]() | January 2009 | Newer by 74 months |
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus SP-590 UZ and Olympus TG-860
SP-590 UZ | TG-860 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | ![]() | No selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | No Touch friendly screen |
Olympus SP-590 UZ vs Olympus TG-860 Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to travel with your camera regularly, you need to factor its weight and measurements. The Olympus SP-590 UZ provides external measurements of 116mm x 84mm x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") with a weight of 413 grams (0.91 lbs) while the Olympus TG-860 has proportions of 110mm x 64mm x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") with a weight of 224 grams (0.49 lbs).
Look at the Olympus SP-590 UZ vs Olympus TG-860 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are employing at that time. Following is the front view physical size comparison of the SP-590 UZ compared to the TG-860.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f6cf6/f6cf6f03b83cabb688f858a287e7d987448358d7" alt="Olympus SP-590 UZ vs Olympus TG-860 size comparison Olympus SP-590 UZ vs Olympus TG-860 size comparison"
Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the SP-590 UZ and TG-860 is 72 and 91 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f4638/f4638a44cf129d39174b8d757e47a8bf8a287f7c" alt="Olympus SP-590 UZ vs Olympus TG-860 top view buttons comparison Olympus SP-590 UZ vs Olympus TG-860 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus SP-590 UZ vs Olympus TG-860 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, its tough to see the gap in sensor dimensions just by seeing a spec sheet. The pic below might offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the SP-590 UZ and TG-860.
As you can see, the 2 cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same MP. You can expect the Olympus TG-860 to provide extra detail as a result of its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also let you crop photographs far more aggressively. The more aged SP-590 UZ will be behind in sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9e7d5/9e7d52e9c9dd45b8832ac5624b6961d09c8793b8" alt="Olympus SP-590 UZ vs Olympus TG-860 sensor size comparison Olympus SP-590 UZ vs Olympus TG-860 sensor size comparison"
Olympus SP-590 UZ vs Olympus TG-860 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7307f/7307f816e86a6ab24b6b215b0bb0fc1a879bccc1" alt="Olympus SP-590 UZ vs Olympus TG-860 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus SP-590 UZ vs Olympus TG-860 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus SP-590 UZ vs Olympus TG-860 Specifications
Olympus SP-590 UZ | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus SP-590 UZ | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860 |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
Revealed | 2009-01-07 | 2015-02-06 |
Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | TruePic VII |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 64 | 125 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 26-676mm (26.0x) | 21-105mm (5.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/2.8-5.0 | f/3.5-5.7 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen diagonal | 2.7" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 15 secs | 4 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 6.0 frames/s | 7.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 8.00 m | 4.00 m (at ISO 1600) |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, off, LED illuminator |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (60p) |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | Yes |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 413g (0.91 lbs) | 224g (0.49 lbs) |
Dimensions | 116 x 84 x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") | 110 x 64 x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 300 photos |
Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | Li-50B |
Self timer | Yes (12 or 2 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch cost | $249 | $279 |