Olympus SP-590 UZ vs Olympus VR-320
72 Imaging
34 Features
38 Overall
35
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/49476/49476823376bf1f79d845d8994f5bd8b0081bd2b" alt="Olympus SP-590 UZ front Olympus SP-590 UZ front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b7e98/b7e986b748f8a3574682ef0ffce60a8d7bbbe4e3" alt="Olympus VR-320 front Olympus VR-320 front"
94 Imaging
37 Features
35 Overall
36
Olympus SP-590 UZ vs Olympus VR-320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-676mm (F2.8-5.0) lens
- 413g - 116 x 84 x 81mm
- Introduced January 2009
- Successor is Olympus SP-600 UZ
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Launched July 2011
- Later Model is Olympus VR-330
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus SP-590 UZ vs Olympus VR-320 Overview
In this article, we will be comparing the Olympus SP-590 UZ vs Olympus VR-320, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras and both of them are sold by Olympus. The image resolution of the SP-590 UZ (12MP) and the VR-320 (14MP) is pretty close and they enjoy the same exact sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
The SP-590 UZ was brought out 3 years prior to the VR-320 which is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus SP-590 UZ being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Olympus VR-320 being a Compact camera.
Before delving in to a comprehensive comparison, below is a simple overview of how the SP-590 UZ grades against the VR-320 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus SP-590 UZ vs Olympus VR-320 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus SP-590 UZ & Olympus VR-320. The entire galleries are available at Olympus SP-590 UZ Gallery & Olympus VR-320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-590 UZ over the Olympus VR-320
SP-590 UZ | VR-320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Very accurate focusing |
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the Olympus SP-590 UZ
VR-320 | SP-590 UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | July 2011 | ![]() | January 2009 | Newer by 30 months |
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Common features in the Olympus SP-590 UZ and Olympus VR-320
SP-590 UZ | VR-320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Same screen resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lacking selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Lacking Touch screen |
Olympus SP-590 UZ vs Olympus VR-320 Physical Comparison
If you're intending to travel with your camera frequently, you have to think about its weight and dimensions. The Olympus SP-590 UZ features external measurements of 116mm x 84mm x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") having a weight of 413 grams (0.91 lbs) whilst the Olympus VR-320 has dimensions of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).
Look at the Olympus SP-590 UZ vs Olympus VR-320 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are utilising at that moment. Below is the front view dimension comparison of the SP-590 UZ and the VR-320.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/70df0/70df0ec846a2a82904fd728bce643976a9e583b8" alt="Olympus SP-590 UZ vs Olympus VR-320 size comparison Olympus SP-590 UZ vs Olympus VR-320 size comparison"
Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the SP-590 UZ and VR-320 is 72 and 94 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b2704/b2704f286ab2f4e4682795e1271e89e443d4bc91" alt="Olympus SP-590 UZ vs Olympus VR-320 top view buttons comparison Olympus SP-590 UZ vs Olympus VR-320 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus SP-590 UZ vs Olympus VR-320 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it's tough to envision the gap in sensor dimensions merely by researching specifications. The image below might offer you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the SP-590 UZ and VR-320.
To sum up, both of the cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same megapixels. You can expect the Olympus VR-320 to result in greater detail having its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop pictures a little more aggressively. The more aged SP-590 UZ will be behind with regard to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fb40e/fb40e76dcaf303861942da5b55182747ee8a344f" alt="Olympus SP-590 UZ vs Olympus VR-320 sensor size comparison Olympus SP-590 UZ vs Olympus VR-320 sensor size comparison"
Olympus SP-590 UZ vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8fcdf/8fcdf5a77989de30d9db4c8ac0b2ca60be6a459e" alt="Olympus SP-590 UZ vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus SP-590 UZ vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus SP-590 UZ vs Olympus VR-320 Specifications
Olympus SP-590 UZ | Olympus VR-320 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus SP-590 UZ | Olympus VR-320 |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2009-01-07 | 2011-07-19 |
Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | TruePic III |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 14MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 4:3 |
Maximum resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4288 x 3216 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
Min native ISO | 64 | 80 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 26-676mm (26.0x) | 24-300mm (12.5x) |
Max aperture | f/2.8-5.0 | f/3.0-5.9 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 230k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Display tech | - | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 15s | 4s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 6.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 8.00 m | 4.70 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 413 gr (0.91 lbs) | 158 gr (0.35 lbs) |
Dimensions | 116 x 84 x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | - | LI-42B |
Self timer | Yes (12 or 2 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal | SD/SDHC |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at launch | $249 | $179 |