Olympus SP-590 UZ vs Ricoh CX5
72 Imaging
34 Features
38 Overall
35
92 Imaging
33 Features
35 Overall
33
Olympus SP-590 UZ vs Ricoh CX5 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-676mm (F2.8-5.0) lens
- 413g - 116 x 84 x 81mm
- Introduced January 2009
- Refreshed by Olympus SP-600 UZ
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 205g - 102 x 59 x 29mm
- Introduced July 2011
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus SP-590 UZ vs Ricoh CX5 Overview
On this page, we will be reviewing the Olympus SP-590 UZ versus Ricoh CX5, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by rivals Olympus and Ricoh. The sensor resolution of the SP-590 UZ (12MP) and the CX5 (10MP) is pretty well matched and both cameras have the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe SP-590 UZ was revealed 3 years prior to the CX5 and that is quite a big gap as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras have different body design with the Olympus SP-590 UZ being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Ricoh CX5 being a Compact camera.
Before diving right into a full comparison, here is a concise highlight of how the SP-590 UZ scores against the CX5 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Olympus SP-590 UZ vs Ricoh CX5 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus SP-590 UZ and Ricoh CX5. The full galleries are available at Olympus SP-590 UZ Gallery and Ricoh CX5 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-590 UZ over the Ricoh CX5
| SP-590 UZ | CX5 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX5 over the Olympus SP-590 UZ
| CX5 | SP-590 UZ | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | July 2011 |  | January 2009 | Fresher by 30 months |
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 920k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus SP-590 UZ and Ricoh CX5
| SP-590 UZ | CX5 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | More accurate focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither includes Touch friendly screen |
Olympus SP-590 UZ vs Ricoh CX5 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to carry your camera regularly, you will want to take into account its weight and volume. The Olympus SP-590 UZ features external measurements of 116mm x 84mm x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") having a weight of 413 grams (0.91 lbs) while the Ricoh CX5 has sizing of 102mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs).
See the Olympus SP-590 UZ versus Ricoh CX5 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are using at that time. Below is a front view physical size comparison of the SP-590 UZ vs the CX5.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the SP-590 UZ and CX5 is 72 and 92 respectively.
Olympus SP-590 UZ vs Ricoh CX5 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it's difficult to imagine the gap between sensor sizing merely by reading through a spec sheet. The photograph below may offer you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the SP-590 UZ and CX5.
As you can see, both cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit different megapixels. You should expect the Olympus SP-590 UZ to give greater detail because of its extra 2MP. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop photographs a bit more aggressively. The older SP-590 UZ is going to be behind with regard to sensor technology.
Olympus SP-590 UZ vs Ricoh CX5 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Olympus SP-590 UZ vs Ricoh CX5 Specifications
| Olympus SP-590 UZ | Ricoh CX5 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model type | Olympus SP-590 UZ | Ricoh CX5 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2009-01-07 | 2011-07-19 |
| Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | - | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Full resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 26-676mm (26.0x) | 28-300mm (10.7x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.8-5.0 | f/3.5-5.6 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 15s | 8s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 6.0 frames per sec | 5.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 8.00 m | 4.00 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 413 grams (0.91 lb) | 205 grams (0.45 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 116 x 84 x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") | 102 x 59 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | - | DB-100 |
| Self timer | Yes (12 or 2 sec) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Price at launch | $249 | $399 |